SEM Summit 2014 Welcome

Introductions & Framing Our Discussions Canadian SEM Summit May 5, 2014 Windsor, Ontario Planning Committee Ray Darlin...

0 downloads 91 Views 733KB Size
Introductions & Framing Our Discussions Canadian SEM Summit May 5, 2014 Windsor, Ontario

Planning Committee Ray Darling, University of Waterloo  Darren Francis, University of the Fraser Valley  Jody Gordon, University of the Fraser Valley  Susan Gottheil, University of Manitoba  Maria Lucido- Bezeley, Sheridan College  Karen McCredie, Capilano University  Clayton Smith, University of Windsor 

Tweet with other SEM Summit participants at:

#SEMCanada2014

Volunteers

Special Thanks...

Facilitators

Our Numbers 83 attending the Summit and 51attended the pre-conference workshop  11 institutions have brought a team of 2 or more  The largest teams are from: 

◦ ◦ ◦ ◦

University of Windsor – 20 University of Manitoba – 4 Humber College – 4 Sheridan College - 4

Roles Represented ◦ Academic Deans /Associate Deans/Faculty Members ◦ Student Affairs/Student Life/Dean of Students ◦ Registrar/Enrolment Services/Recruitment ◦ Institutional Analysis ◦ Teaching & Learning Centres ◦ First Generation Student Programs ◦ Aboriginal Programs ◦ Student Governments/First Generation Students ◦ Pathways Programs/School Boards

We are from... 

Representatives from all provinces ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦



Ontario – 61 British Columbia – 8 Manitoba- 4 Alberta – 2 PEI – 1 Newfoundland – 1 Nova Scotia – 1 Saskatchewan- 1 Quebec – 1 New Brunswick - 1

One representative from the US

Let’s Meet Each Other

Our Style No vendors  Facilitators; not presenters  No silos here  Its all about conversation and learning from each other 

“First Generation”: Is There a Definition? 

Literature reviews show that the definition changes depending on the author and the concept’s usage



What definition should we use for our SEM Summit discussions?



Are there sub-sets within this group – and can their experiences be generalized? 12

Why Should We Focus on First Generation Students?

13

Why Focus on FG Students? 

Parental education is one of the strongest indicators of whether or not youth pursue PSE*

◦ Students with at least one university-educated parent are 40% more likely to attend university than those who have a high school education or less (Zhao, 2012) ◦ Throughout Canada having no family history of college or university is a significantly greater obstacle to higher education than family income (Finnie, Childs & Wismer, 2011; Zhao 2012)

*NOTE: Parental education and Aboriginal identity represent the two largest negative effects on PSE participation (Norrie & Zhao, 2011) 14

Why Focus on FG Students? FG university students have higher leaving rates and lower graduation rates  These patterns are in contrast to FG college leaving rates where no such gaps exist  FG immigrants have higher leaving rates than non-immigrants and much lower graduation rates 

◦ Yet FG immigrants access PSE, especially university, at considerably higher rates than nonimmigrants



Aboriginal students have the highest leaving rates than any group

15

Results from the US-based Baccalaureate & Beyond Longitudinal Study First Generation status is a significant predictor of GPA controlling for an extensive array of background and intervening variables.  Results suggest that first-generation status significantly explains differences in cumulative GPA, accounting for nearly 22% (p < .001) of GPA variance. -Strayhorn (2006) 

16

BUT...

Lumping all FG Students together is a blunt policy tool. - Finnie, Childs & Qiu, 2012

17

Questions & Comments