Pawan Agarwal Neemrana

Next Five Years for Education Challenges & Policy Response Pawan Agarwal 13th Neemrana Conference, 16-18 December 2011 ...

0 downloads 78 Views 1MB Size
Next Five Years for Education Challenges & Policy Response Pawan Agarwal 13th Neemrana Conference, 16-18 December 2011

Outline

2

1.

Progress in Education

2.

Challenges of Schooling

3.

Higher Education Growth

4.

Conceptual Framework for HE Growth

5.

Higher Education – Puzzle

6.

Strategy to Manage Expansion

Enrolments – Various Levels in terms of Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) Growth 2001-2009 120

India Versus China

2001 2009

120

1 1 4 .4

111.4

100

India China

9 6 .3

113.0

100 92.0

7 6 .3

6 0 .2

60

GER – in percent

GER – in percent

80

5 9 .4

5 4 .0 44

40

60

78

76.3

59.8 54.0 48

47.0

40

3 4 .3

3 2 .0

80

34.3

26

25

20

15

20

15

7 .5

0

Pre-primary (- Primary (I-V) Upper Primary I) (VI-VIII)

Secondary (IX-X)

Upper Secondary (XI-XII)

Source: UNESCO Gobal Education Digest 2011 and Other Sources

Higher (XII +)

0

Pre-primary (- I)

Primary (I-V) Upper Primary (VI-VIII)

Secondary (IX-X)

Upper Secondary (XI-XII)

Higher (XII+)

3

Multiple Challenges at School Level Coverage

•Net Enrolment 16-18 % below gross enrolment •Uncovered areas and underserved communities

Attendance

•Attendance almost 12-14% lower than net enrolment •One-fifth of children from 6 to 17 years are out of school

Teachers

•Large vacancies and adverse teacher-pupil ratio •Unqualified teachers and teacher absenteeism

Quality

• Poor learning outcomes - 47% of children in grade 5 unable to read even a grade 2 level text in 2009 in rural India (ASER 2010)

Progression

•High drop outs - Mean year of schooling merely 4.2 years •Sharp decline at upper primary and upper secondary levels

Private growth

•Unfair practices – regulatory challenge •Equity problem – bias against girls and lower castes

Response – Universal coverage with better quality of schooling Sarva Siksha Abhiyan and Madhyamik Siksha Abhiyan 4

Growth of Institutions & Enrolment 40,000

25,000 35,000

35,000

16,000 25,000 13,000 20,000 10,000 15,000 7,000 10,406 10,000 7,073 5,000

4,000 5,932

3,359 605

1,000

1,864

0

-2,000 1950-51

1960-61

1970-71

1980-81

1990-91

2000-01

2010-01

* 1980-81 figures include institutions and enrolment in post-matric courses Source: Statistics of Higher and Technical Education, 2011, Ministry of HRD

Enrolment ('000)

19,000

30,000

Number of Institutions

22,000

Growth (2000-2010) Number of universities and colleges 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 2000 Universities and colleges - Govt Engineering Colleges Pvt Medical colleges - Govt

2010 Universities and Colleges - Pvt Management Institutions - Govt Medical Colleges - Pvt

Engineering Colleges - Govt Managemnt Institutions - Pvt

Growth of Technical Institutions 1137 1114 1081

1228 1198 1021

854

1095

665

1003

Management

1132

2262

2385

1940

Pharmacy MCA

1169

1017

1523

1149 2972

3222

3393

2388

Engineering

1511

2006-07

Source: AICTE

1668

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

India has seen private sector-led growth over the past years This trend is likely to continue.....

• Dramatic expansion both institutions and enrolment over past 10 years

• Growth mostly in private institutions mainly in engineering & management

• Bulk of the enrolment continues to be in General stream

• For further higher education growth, expansion of secondary schooling is needed

8

Enrolment (GER)

Forms and phases of higher education in ‘Modern Societies’ Universal Over 50% Mass 16-50% Elite 0-15%

• Great diversity with no • Comprehensive with more

common standards • Boundaries and sequences break down, distinction between learning and life breaks down

diverse standards • Homogeneous with high and • Modular, flexible and semistructured sequence of common standards • Highly structured in terms of courses academic and professional Changing nature of content and institutions conceptions of knowledge

Purpose

• Shaping the mind and character of ruling class, a preparation for elite roles

Source: Martin Trow, 2006

• Transmission of skills and preparation of a broader range of technical and economic elite roles

• Adaptation of the whole population to rapid social and technological changes

Expanding higher education needs diversity Students are increasingly diverse

Employer demand for skills

Are changing rapidly, diversifying and unpredictable With private sector employers looking for more different skills and competencies

In interest Massification needs diversification differentiation

Not good enough to just have ‘degrees’

Source: .Adpated from Sachi Hatakenaka (CPR Higher Education Dialogue, 2011) 10

In learning style and capacity In socio-economic backgrounds In secondary school preparation

Puzzle - Pieces Not Fitting Together

Rising unemployment of graduates despite skill shortages Level of unemployment / underemployment rises with level of education

>1 million applicants with many graduates and PGs for 4013 peon posts in West Bengal

Huge unmet demand for higher education

11

Very High Graduate Unemployment Rates

Industry not finding skilled people

Raise GER in higher education to 30% by 2020

Graduate Unemploy ment Rate 25%

2.5 million White-collar jobs against 6.8 million graduates every year

Cancel courses with less than 60% graduates failing to find work

Aspiration as ‘Growth Driver’ India

Advanced nations

Differentiated System of Higher Education

Multidisciplinary Research Universities

Teaching focussed institutions

•To help create knowledge relevant for India •To establish research excellence •Wide range of options within •Professional/vocational/academic/cultural •Specialization opportunities after entrance •With energetic career service •Good for inclusiveness

Short-cycle vocational education coupled with remedial academic education

Private sector-led growth But unlikely to be good enough for -

Usually good enough for quantity , so long as the public remains confident about education quality (?) Balance and Manage Private Growth

Quality Fees are usually not enough quality enhancing inputs e.g. research, staff training, curriculum development, laboratories and libraries Diversity Public institutions cannot change and private institutions tend to ‘replicate’ models of success Equity Fee-based expansion is difficult for students from poorer families

Strategic Manage Expansion Robust Higher Education aligned to Aspirations and Economy

Institutional growth Enable ‘quality leading innovating’ institutions to emerge in each of diverse spheres Ensure proper governance structure

Accreditation and Public Information to support student choice to provide better incentives for institutions to improve

Funding key areas •Where private investments is unlikely (like research) •Access for the poor (Vocational/ teacher education) •Student finance – scholarships/loans

Appropriate Institutional Structure Enabling Policy Environment

THANK YOU 16