NEA FY 2013 Funding Request $15.2
$12.3
$600
$775
$200
billion
billion
million
million
million
Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Special Education Grants to States
School Improvement State Grants
Rural Education
(IDEA Part B-611)
(ESEA section 1003(g))
English Language Acquisition State Grants
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
+$650
+$675
+$66
+$43
+$21
+4.5 percent
+5.8 percent
+12.5 percent
+5.9 percent
+11.6 percent
(ESEA Title I, Part A)
million
million
(ESEA Title III, Part A)
million
million
(ESEA VI-B)
million
Enrollment in Public preK-12 1
48.2
47.7 2001
2002
48.5
2003
48.8
2004
(in millions)
49.1
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.4
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
49.6
2012
Enrollment in Postsecondary Degree-Granting Institutions 1
16.6
15.9
2001
2002
16.9
2003
17.3
17.5
17.8
2004
2005
2006
18.2
2007
49.9
2013
(in millions)
20.4
20.6
20.7
20.7
20.9
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
19.1
2008
U.S. Department of Education Discretionary Funding 1,2
(excluding Federal Pell Grants)
Annual Percentage Change, Regular Appropriations (excluding the Recovery Act)
16%
A minimum increase of $1.26 billion is required Obama budget to keep pace with inflation and enrollment growth in 2013
12% 8%
inflation and enrollment growth
4% 0%
appropriation
-4% 2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
1. Hussar, W.J., and Bailey, T.M. (2011). Projections of Education Statistics to 2020 (NCES 2011-026). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 2. U.S. Department of Education Budget Service. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or
[email protected]. February 27, 2012.
2012
2013
NEA FY 2013 Funding Request $15.2
$12.3
$600
$775
$200
billion
billion
million
million
million
Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Special Education Grants to States
School Improvement State Grants
Rural Education
(IDEA Part B-611)
(ESEA section 1003(g))
English Language Acquisition State Grants
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
+$650
+$675
+$66
+$43
+$21
+4.5 percent
+5.8 percent
+12.5 percent
+5.9 percent
+11.6 percent
(ESEA Title I, Part A)
million
million
million
(ESEA VI-B)
(ESEA Title III, Part A)
million
million
Achievement is Improving and Gaps are Narrowing for Title I Students 1 Title I participants have made gains since 2002 in 79 percent or more of the states with sufficient data, according to either mean scores or percentages proficient. In some grade and subject combinations, 90 percent or more of these states showed gains for Title I students.
Gaps between Title I and non-Title I students have narrowed more often than they have widened since 2002, although trends were less encouraging at grade 4 than at grade 8 or high school.
When gaps narrowed, it was most often because achievement improved for both Title I and non-Title I students but at a faster rate for Title I students. This combination accounted for 78 percent of the instances of mean score gaps narrowing and 82 percent of the instances of percentage proficient gaps narrowing.
Gaps between Title I and non-Title I students were generally smaller than the gaps between low-income and non-low-income students, and smaller than African American-white gaps and Latino-white gaps.
Revenue Targeting by Source 2
Title I Funding Gap 3
Revenue per Student by District Poverty Quartile
Current appropriation represents only 38 percent of full funding
$388 $3,973
$721 $4,525
$928 $4,618
$1,449
Federal
$23.6 billion
$5,478
$6,475
Funding Gap
State
$3,556
$3,098 Local
Lowest
Next Lowest
$38.1 billion Full Funding
$4,837
Next Highest
$14.5 billion Appropriation
Highest
1. Nancy Kober, Jennifer McMurrer, Malini R. Silva. 2011. State Test Score Trends Through 2008-09, Part 4: Is Achievement Improving and Are Gaps Narrowing for Title I Students? Center on Education Policy. Washington, DC. 2. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service, State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, Volume VI—Targeting and Uses of Federal Education Funds, Washington, D.C., 2009. 3. NEA calculations based on unpublished data from the Congressional Research Service. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or
[email protected]. February 27, 2012.
NEA FY 2013 Funding Request $15.2
$12.3
$600
$775
$200
billion
billion
million
million
million
Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Special Education Grants to States
School Improvement State Grants
Rural Education
(IDEA Part B-611)
(ESEA section 1003(g))
English Language Acquisition State Grants
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
+$650
+$675
+$66
+$43
+$21
+4.5 percent
+5.8 percent
+12.5 percent
+5.9 percent
+11.6 percent
(ESEA Title I, Part A)
million
million
million
Special Education Funding Gap 1
(ESEA VI-B)
(ESEA Title III, Part A)
million
million
Regular Appropriations (excluding the Recovery Act), Selected Years
NEA's request returns the federal share to 16.7 percent in FY 2013, last reached in FY 2010
40% Full Funding
17 .1
18 .5
17 .1
17 .2
16 .4
16 .3
15 .8
14 .1
2013 Obama Budget
2012
2011
2009
2007
1995
2005
1993
9 .2
2003
7 .8
2001
8 .2
1999
8 .6
1997
8 .2
1991
9 .1
1989
1983
1981
8 .9
1987
9 .5
1985
10 .2
11.1
Actual Federal Share (%)
Cost Shift to States and Local Districts from the Shortfall in Federal Support 1 (not to scale) 1981-2001
1981-1991
$48 billion 1981
1991
$2.5
$6.7
billion
$148 billion 2001
$11.6 billion
billion
1. NEA calculations using data from the U.S. Department of Education Budget Service and Congressional Research Service. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or
[email protected]. February 27, 2012.
1981-2012
$303 billion 2012
$16.7 billion
NEA FY 2013 Funding Request $15.2
$12.3
$600
$775
$200
billion
billion
million
million
million
Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Special Education Grants to States
School Improvement State Grants
Rural Education
(IDEA Part B-611)
(ESEA section 1003(g))
English Language Acquisition State Grants
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
+$650
+$675
+$66
+$43
+$21
+4.5 percent
+5.8 percent
+12.5 percent
+5.9 percent
+11.6 percent
(ESEA Title I, Part A)
million
million
(ESEA VI-B)
(ESEA Title III, Part A)
million
million
million
Eligible Schools vs Schools Funded 1 Eligible Schools
Schools Funded
1,200
14,000
1,000
12,000
Tier I: Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring that are the lowest-achieving five percent; or high schools with graduation rate less than 60 percent over many years.
10,000 800
Tier II: schools eligible for but not receiving Title I funds that are 8,000
the lowest-achieving five percent of secondary schools;
600
or high schools with a graduation rate less than 60 percent
6,000
over many years.
400
4,000
Tier III: Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring
200
0
2,000
Tier I
that are not in Tier I.
0
Tier II
Tier III
Characteristics of Eligible and Funded Schools 1 All Schools
Level
60%
50%
40%
40%
30%
30%
20%
20%
10%
10%
0%
Eligible Schools
Schools Funded
Locale
60%
50%
(percent of schools)
40% 30% 20% 10%
0% Elementary Middle
High
Other
Size
50%
0% Urban
Suburban
Rural
1. Hurlburt, S., Le Floch, K.C., Therriault, S.B., and Cole, S. (2011). Baseline Analyses of SIG Applications and SIG-Eligible and SIG-Awarded Schools (NCEE 2011-4019). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or
[email protected]. February 27, 2012.
200 <
201-400 401-600 (number of students)
601 >
NEA FY 2013 Funding Request $15.2
$12.3
$600
$775
$200
billion
billion
million
million
million
Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Special Education Grants to States
School Improvement State Grants
Rural Education
(IDEA Part B-611)
(ESEA section 1003(g))
English Language Acquisition State Grants
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
+$650
+$675
+$66
+$43
+$21
+4.5 percent
+5.8 percent
+12.5 percent
+5.9 percent
+11.6 percent
(ESEA Title I, Part A)
million
million
(ESEA VI-B)
(ESEA Title III, Part A)
million
million
million
Enrollment in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools by Race/Ethnicity 1 annual percentage change
6.0%
Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander
5.0%
White, Black, and Native American/Alaska Native
4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% -1.0% -2.0% 2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
English Language Learners 2
Hispanic
16 %
Asian
16 %
3% 1%
2011
2012
2013
2014 2015
2016
2018
2019
2020
Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander 30%
25%
Percentage of Enrollment in Public Schools Grades 9-12 Percentage of Public High School Graduates
Pacific Islander
Native American/Alaska Native
2017
Graduation Gap 1
Percentage of school-age children who spoke a language other than English at home and spoke English with difficulty
6%
2010
20%
White
1%
African American
1%
Multi-Racial
15 %
2001
2005
2010
1. Hussar, W.J., and Bailey, T.M. (2011). Projections of Education Statistics to 2020 (NCES 2011-026). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 2. Aud, S., Hussar, W., Kena, G., Bianco, K., Frohlich, L., Kemp, J., Tahan, K. (2011). The Condition of Education 2011 (NCES 2011-033). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or
[email protected]. February 27, 2012.
2015
2020
NEA FY 2013 Funding Request $15.2
$12.3
$600
$775
$200
billion
billion
million
million
million
Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Special Education Grants to States
School Improvement State Grants
Rural Education
(IDEA Part B-611)
(ESEA section 1003(g))
English Language Acquisition State Grants
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
+$650
+$675
+$66
+$43
+$21
+4.5 percent
+5.8 percent
+12.5 percent
+5.9 percent
+11.6 percent
(ESEA Title I, Part A)
million
million
million
Federal Revenue by Locale 1
million
million
Revenue Targeting by Source 1
Federal Revenue as a Percentage of Total Revenue Local
(ESEA VI-B)
(ESEA Title III, Part A)
State
Revenue Percentage by Source & Poverty Quintile RURAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS
Federal 8.0
Town
8.8
Suburban
41%
5%
7%
49%
53%
10% 56%
5.5
58%
State
City
16%
10.2
56%
Percentage of All Federal Revenue
46%
Rural
40%
18.1% 12.5%
Suburban
41.5%
26% City Low
27.9%
Changing Demographics in Rural Schools1,2 Race/Ethnicity 80% 60%
Middle Low
2003-04
Middle
2007-08
Free or Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility
10%
20%
10%
2% 0% White
8% 6%
10%
4%
0%
English Language Learners 12%
15%
Black
Hispanic
Asian
4%
5%
2%
0%
0%
Indian
1. Rural Education in America, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. 2. Provasnik, S., KewalRamani, A., Coleman, M.M., Gilbertson, L., Herring, W., and Xie, Q. (2007). Status of Education in Rural America (NCES 2007-040). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or
[email protected]. February 27, 2012.
High
(percentage distribution)
25%
6%
20%
Middle High
12%
8%
40%
33% Local
Town
Federal
Rural
NEA FY 2013 Funding Request $15.2
$12.3
$600
$775
$200
billion
billion
million
million
million
Grants to Local Educational Agencies
Special Education Grants to States
School Improvement State Grants
Rural Education
(IDEA Part B-611)
(ESEA section 1003(g))
English Language Acquisition State Grants
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
vs. FY 2012
+$650
+$675
+$66
+$43
+$21
+4.5 percent
+5.8 percent
+12.5 percent
+5.9 percent
+11.6 percent
(ESEA Title I, Part A)
million
million
million
(ESEA VI-B)
(ESEA Title III, Part A)
million
Sustained Funding for Other Priority Programs
million
(in millions except Federal Pell Grants)
$5,635 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Federal Pell Grants
(maximum award)
$2,467
Career & Technical Education State Grants Impact Aid Basic Support Payments
Federal Work-Study
$1,154
$1,152
Federal TRIO Programs
$1,123 $977
21st Century Community
$840 $735
Learning Centers Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants
For more information, contact Tom Zembar at 202.822.7109 or
[email protected]. February 27, 2012.
$541 Aid for Institutional Development
$302 GEAR UP
