National Pork Board Position on Antimicrobial Use in Pork Production: July, 2002
Originally published as a National Pork Board Factsheet.
National Pork Board Statements • • • • • • •
To preserve the availability and effectiveness of antimicrobials, a coordinated and appropriate response to the issue of antimicrobial resistance is necessary. Producers and their veterinarians must have the flexibility to responsibly address animal health and production in a timely, cost-effective manner. Producers continue in their science-based commitment to ensure the safety of pork and to maintain consumer confidence. The National Pork Board and the nation’s pork producers are supportive of educational efforts to ensure that antimicrobial use does not compromise food safety. The National Pork Board supports a rigorous U.S. Food and Drug Administration process that reviews the scientific data, that evaluates product safety and efficacy and that approves antimicrobials for use in animals. If, based on sound science, additional oversight of antimicrobial use and distribution is considered necessary, stakeholders should discuss the best implementation strategies to achieve the desired result. The National Pork Board supports the development of effective and affordable alternatives to the use of antimicrobials for enhancing production. It has charged its Non-Antimicrobial Production Enhancement Working Group to review the knowledge with regard to the efficacy and economy of the use of non-antimicrobial alternatives to enhance production, to identify the confounding variables that must be controlled to scientifically evaluate the success of these products and/or management techniques, to recommend a research agenda to address knowledge gaps, and to develop a plan of action to educate pork producers about these products and/or management techniques.
National Pork Board Position It is essential to public health and food safety, animal health and well-being, and the environment to maintain the effectiveness and availability of antimicrobials. All decisions affecting the availability of antimicrobials for animal use need to be transparent and based on sound science. The National Pork Board supports the use of antimicrobials only when they provide demonstrable benefits and urges producers to: • take appropriate steps to decrease the need for their application; • adhere to judicious use guidelines; • assess the benefits and costs of all uses of antimicrobials; and • complete the Pork Quality Assurance Program and fully implement into their daily operations the management practices described for responsible use of animal health products.
PAGE
PIG 12-07-09
Reference to products in this publication is not intended to be an endorsement to the exclusion of others which may be similar. Persons using such products assume responsibility for their use in accordance with current directions of the manufacturer. The information represented herein is believed to be accurate but is in no way guaranteed. The authors, reviewers, and publishers assume no liability in connection with any use for the products discussed and make no warranty, expressed or implied, in that respect, nor can it be assumed that all safety measures are indicated herein or that additional measures may be required. The user therefore, must assume full responsibility, both as to persons and as to property, for the use of these materials including any which might be covered by patent. This material may be available in alternative formats.
PAGE
PIG 12-07-09
Information developed for the Pork Information Gateway, a project of the U.S. Pork Center of Excellence supported fully by USDA/Agricultural Research Service, USDA/Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, Pork Checkoff, NPPC, state pork associations from Iowa, Kentucky, Missouri, Mississippi, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, and Utah, and the Extension Services from several cooperating Land-Grant Institutions including Iowa State University, North Carolina State University, University of Minnesota, University of Illinois, University of Missouri, University of Nebraska, Purdue University, The Ohio State University, South Dakota State University, Kansas State University, Michigan State University, University of Wisconsin, Texas A & M University, Virginia Tech University, University of Tennessee, North Dakota State University, University of Georgia, University of Arkansas, and Colorado State University.
U.S. Pork Center of Excellence
2006
