! & ' () ,! - . ' - . ! 1 ! ! 0 '! - 3 ' % ! !4 ' !5 .
" !
7
% !,! '
() +
'
! !
/
!
6
0
%
2
# 2$ ! !
% %' ' -
!
!
!
'
- 5
'
%
3'
! !
' .
'
-
,! !&
% !
•
0
'
!
%
# 2$
% 6!
!
+
!
!
2
!
0
•
"$ +
0
' '!
! ' '
# ' '
0
-
' ,
!
%
*
" ' *
! !
)9
! '
! ! 8
%
!
' %
!
%
!
•
!
' !!
! •
!
! !
!
• ! 1"
• •
! -
!
% ! % )
!
!
! ! ' ! ! '
'
%
0
0
!
!
: '
2
! '
0 -
!% %
! ! !! '
, ! 4 !
' - . ' 0
' ''! & ! -
! !
! % !
' ' ' %
!"#
$
%
&
/ 0)* ! !+,-!.
#& )* ! !+,-!.
' (
(
1112 13 " &" "1 2 "
, *
+
,!
5
!
! ;
'
!
-
!
! !
! '
*
+ ' %
,! 3 ! !
!
#3 ;$
& !
- 5
! !
5
! % 6 6
* '
'
% % -
+
,!
; '! ! •
2
! ! '!%
! !
-
)
!
! .
! - 5 # 2$
! ! >! >!
!
& !
!'
% ' % 6! 6
- 5 !
1
!
!
?(@
! '
; !! 2
& !
! % '
0
3
; !! !
! ! ! != -
-
! '! -
%
!
6 !
' A +." ?(@ @
! ! '! -
% !
; '!
) # '!
?(@
' !
!
!
% !
!
!
!
'
'!
-
5 ' % - 5 !
•
?(@ $ -
@ •
!
( B
B , '
( '
!
- 5
'
' !
-
!
&
; % ! !
' -
'! '!
!
! ' ! ' % '
; '! -
) ! !
??@
C !
! '!
'!
! !!
'
?)
!
! (- ,!
% )
!
; '!
) ! ,! , '! ,! , ' '!
(@
! % !
' '! ?) ( ?- ,! ! ! !% - D ! ! % ' ! / ! -
(@
'
!
•
! '
!! B?@- C ' ! +%
!
!
%
(@ ' A +." ' (@ @ -
!
'
! '
%
!
'!
•
•
)
' A +." (@ ! @
' ! !
! ! '!
% !
-
'! ! ! ' ?B@ ? @! '
(@ ! ,! -
' !
! -
! !! !
'
! 3 !
' ,! ! ! -
5 ,! +%
!
!
!
% '
' '! .
!
1
,
,! / !
!,!
;
! %! 6 • , ! • • " • / • !
! - 5
!
! 6 D
!
+
!
! ,
3
* '
'
,
' '!
!
*
, +
! ,! + ! ' ! ! % ! !
'
!
! '
!
,!
' '
C '
!
! "
#"
5
A +." 5 % 8
! *
$ % /
+
!
%
$
5 ! - 5
- 3 !
%
% !
'
'
-
7
'(()*(+ ' !
'
'((+*,( $
#
#
%
'((+ '(,(
'
'
' %&
$
!
9F
E-(
9-(
E-B
B-
9-?
E-E
9-B
E-
F-(
9-E
# * + % % 6 ! !! * +
'
!
!
!
' ' ! % % ! ' ' ' '
*
+ !
! '
! '
'
! % ) !
!% % -5
!
! !
!
*
'
*
!
* !
--. ' //. ' ($
+
,
!
6 6
,,0
#
2
'
3
4 1"
)5 ): 0
- 7 % !
'
D
I
2 ! •
#
"
', %
2 !
• •
D
J5
! '!
! !
!
' !
!
' '
-
)
#
) !!
$ J
'
! %
%
'
1
2
' ! '
9
- 5 '
%
!
% !
D
! !
-
-
J '
!
D +' ' 6 ! H ! * #F F$B ?)9B? -
5
! ' 0 ! ! D - ; ' ! ' ! ' !
J 2 ,K
5 ! L 0 '!
F) B$
7 8 7$
! •
' !,
-
6 !
"
+ '; % ! 0 - 5
!
?$
F) B$ B) ?G B
! ' !
1 !
5
5
(! ' ! #?F@ ' ! ' ! #B @
?) ( F? B) ?G B( %! #?FB ?) ( F
5 ! ; ! ' 0 '! ' ' ! " ! %
#7
3' -
%
E '
,1',
9
!!
'
.
'
! %
'E '! ! % !,!
E
? ? D -
Full Annual Education Report
School-Level Student Assessment Data for Ottawa Area ISD, West Ottawa Public School District, Harbor Lights Middle School Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Student Group
School Year
% Students Tested
State % Students Proficient
District % Students Proficient
School % Students Proficient
% Advanced (Level 1)
% % Partially % Not Proficient Proficient Proficient (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 4)
English Language Arts / Reading Grade: 06 All Students All Students Female Female Male Male Black or
2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
80.5% 87.7% 82.9% 90% 78.2% 85.4% 63.5%
80.9% 90.8% 81.5% 94.2% 80.3% 87.4% 64.3%
82.4% 92.4% 81.1% 96.8% 83.5% 87.5% 57.9%
40.8% 33.1% 43.4% 32.3% 38.3% 34% 10.5%
41.6% 59.3% 37.7% 64.6% 45.2% 53.5% 47.4%
11.6% 6.6% 11.4% 2.5% 11.7% 11.1% 21.1%
6.1% 1% 7.4% 0.6% 4.8% 1.4% 21.1%
Student Group African American Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native American Indian or Alaska Native Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or Latino White White
School Year
% Students Tested
State % Students Proficient
District % Students Proficient
School % Students Proficient
% Advanced (Level 1)
% % Partially % Not Proficient Proficient Proficient (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 4)
2009-10
100%
75.8%
85.7%
100%
10%
90%
0%
0%
2008-09
<10
78.2%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2009-10
<10
84.7%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2008-09
100%
89.1%
82.1%
90.2%
34.1%
56.1%
4.9%
4.9%
2009-10
100%
93.8%
89.9%
87.2%
25.6%
61.5%
12.8%
0%
2008-09
100%
68.7%
66.9%
65.4%
19.2%
46.2%
25%
9.6%
2009-10
100%
82.3%
85.2%
87%
10.1%
76.8%
10.1%
2.9%
2008-09 2009-10
100% 100%
85.7% 91.1%
89.6% 95.2%
92.4% 97.7%
58.2% 45.6%
34.2% 52%
4.9% 1.8%
2.7% 0.6%
Student Group
School Year
Multiracial 2008-09 Multiracial 2009-10 Limited 2008-09 English Proficient Limited 2009-10 English Proficient Students 2008-09 with Disabilities Students 2009-10 with Disabilities Economically2008-09 Disadvantaged Economically2009-10 Disadvantaged Migrant 2008-09 Migrant 2009-10
% Students Tested 100% 100% 100%
State % District % School % % % Students Students Students Advanced Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient (Level 1) (Level 2) 79.8% 83.3% 84.6% 38.5% 46.2% 87% 81.5% 58.3% 33.3% 25% 51.2% 57.9% 60.5% 13.2% 47.4%
% Partially Proficient (Level 3) 7.7% 41.7% 23.7%
% Not Proficient (Level 4) 7.7% 0% 15.8%
100%
70%
84.1%
85.7%
11.1%
74.6%
11.1%
3.2%
100%
44.7%
35.4%
40.9%
15.9%
25%
29.5%
29.5%
100%
59.9%
66.2%
68.8%
9.4%
59.4%
28.1%
3.1%
100%
69.2%
70.7%
69.6%
16.5%
53.2%
19%
11.4%
100%
81.1%
87.5%
87.9%
18.4%
69.5%
9.9%
2.1%
100% <10
61.8% 77.4%
58.3% <10
54.5% <10
9.1% <10
45.5% <10
18.2% <10
27.3% <10
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
79.6% 82% 82.8% 84.5% 76.5%
82.7% 83.9% 86.5% 88.4% 79%
82% 83.3% 84% 88% 79.6%
36.4% 47.3% 37.9% 51.4% 34.7%
45.6% 36.1% 46.2% 36.6% 44.9%
12% 11.2% 12.4% 7.1% 11.6%
6% 5.5% 3.6% 4.9% 8.8%
Grade: 07 All Students All Students Female Female Male
2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
Student Group Male Black or African American Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or Latino White White Multiracial
School Year
% Students Tested
2009-10 2008-09
100% 100%
State % District % School % % % % Partially % Not Students Students Students Advanced Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 4) 79.6% 79.4% 78.7% 43.2% 35.5% 15.3% 6% 61.6% 84.2% 78.6% 21.4% 57.1% 21.4% 0%
2009-10
100%
64.4%
60.7%
47.1%
5.9%
41.2%
41.2%
11.8%
2009-10
<10
79.2%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2008-09
100%
89.9%
76%
75%
21.4%
53.6%
10.7%
14.3%
2009-10
100%
89.9%
87.7%
87.5%
45%
42.5%
7.5%
5%
2008-09
100%
69.9%
67.8%
65.5%
17.2%
48.3%
23%
11.5%
2009-10
100%
71.7%
70.6%
67.3%
20.2%
47.1%
21.2%
11.5%
2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
100% 100% 100%
84.7% 87.3% 78.3%
90.8% 92.7% 84.4%
91.4% 94.7% 87.5%
47.2% 66.3% 58.3%
44.2% 28.3% 29.2%
6.7% 3.2% 4.2%
1.8% 2.1% 8.3%
Student Group
School Year
Multiracial 2009-10 Limited 2008-09 English Proficient Limited 2009-10 English Proficient Students 2008-09 with Disabilities Students 2009-10 with Disabilities Economically2008-09 Disadvantaged Economically2009-10 Disadvantaged Migrant 2008-09 Migrant 2009-10
% Students Tested 100% 100%
State % District % School % % % % Partially % Not Students Students Students Advanced Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 4) 77.4% 85% 80% 46.7% 33.3% 20% 0% 52.3% 63.9% 64.7% 14.7% 50% 22.1% 13.2%
100%
54.3%
63%
58.2%
13.9%
44.3%
27.8%
13.9%
100%
42.7%
49.2%
44.7%
10.5%
34.2%
23.7%
31.6%
100%
48%
47.1%
45.7%
21.7%
23.9%
30.4%
23.9%
100%
68.3%
74.2%
75.2%
23.4%
51.7%
16.6%
8.3%
100%
72.4%
74.9%
71.4%
26.4%
45.1%
18.7%
9.9%
100% 100%
65.9% 59.6%
75% 50%
90% 46.2%
20% 7.7%
70% 38.5%
0% 23.1%
10% 30.8%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
75.5% 83.4% 78.6% 87.5% 72.6% 79.4%
82% 86.5% 84.8% 89.9% 79.4% 83.1%
83% 85.4% 86.3% 87.1% 80.1% 83.3%
35% 36.8% 38.6% 42.7% 31.8% 29.9%
48% 48.6% 47.7% 44.4% 48.3% 53.5%
12.8% 13% 9.8% 11.7% 15.3% 14.6%
4.3% 1.6% 3.9% 1.2% 4.5% 2.1%
Grade: 08 All Students All Students Female Female Male Male
2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10
Student Group Black or African American Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or Latino White White Multiracial Multiracial
School Year
% Students Tested
2008-09
100%
State % District % School % % % % Partially % Not Students Students Students Advanced Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 4) 56.5% 66.7% 75% 25% 50% 8.3% 16.7%
2009-10
100%
70.9%
89.5%
84.6%
30.8%
53.8%
7.7%
7.7%
2008-09
<10
72.6%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2008-09
100%
86.1%
80.4%
78%
34.1%
43.9%
19.5%
2.4%
2009-10
100%
91%
78.7%
74.1%
33.3%
40.7%
22.2%
3.7%
2008-09
100%
65.1%
66.7%
65.9%
17.6%
48.4%
23.1%
11%
2009-10
100%
76.5%
77.1%
76.5%
23.5%
52.9%
21.2%
2.4%
2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10
100% 100% 100% 100%
80.9% 86.9% 74.7% 79.1%
92.5% 92.9% 70% 81.4%
95.2% 92.8% 66.7% 78.3%
45.2% 46.1% 33.3% 26.1%
50% 46.7% 33.3% 52.2%
4.2% 6.6% 33.3% 21.7%
0.6% 0.6% 0% 0%
Student Group
School Year
Limited 2008-09 English Proficient Limited 2009-10 English Proficient Students 2008-09 with Disabilities Students 2009-10 with Disabilities Economically2008-09 Disadvantaged Economically2009-10 Disadvantaged Migrant 2008-09 Migrant 2009-10
% Students Tested 100%
State % District % School % % % % Partially % Not Students Students Students Advanced Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 4) 46.4% 58% 56.6% 14.5% 42.1% 30.3% 13.2%
100%
61%
72.2%
71.4%
25.7%
45.7%
24.3%
4.3%
100%
35.1%
36.8%
42.9%
3.6%
39.3%
42.9%
14.3%
100%
48.6%
48.4%
43.9%
9.8%
34.1%
53.7%
2.4%
100%
62.7%
71.3%
72.1%
20.6%
51.5%
19.1%
8.8%
100%
75%
79%
78%
28.6%
49.4%
19.6%
2.4%
100% 100%
54.2% 70%
78.6% 66.7%
76.9% 70%
23.1% 40%
53.8% 30%
7.7% 30%
15.4% 0%
100% 100% 100% 100%
79.9% 82% 80.9% 83%
81.6% 88.8% 82.7% 90.4%
82.4% 87.3% 84.1% 88.7%
56.3% 62.1% 55.7% 65.4%
26.1% 25.2% 28.4% 23.3%
14% 10.8% 13.6% 10.1%
3.6% 2% 2.3% 1.3%
Mathematics Grade: 06 All Students All Students Female Female
2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10
Student Group Male Male Black or African American Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native American Indian or Alaska Native Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or
School Year
% Students Tested
2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
100% 100% 100%
State % District % School % % % Students Students Students Advanced Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient (Level 1) (Level 2) 78.9% 80.6% 80.9% 56.9% 23.9% 81.1% 87.2% 85.7% 58.5% 27.2% 61.2% 58.6% 57.9% 42.1% 15.8%
% Partially Proficient (Level 3) 14.4% 11.6% 26.3%
% Not Proficient (Level 4) 4.8% 2.7% 15.8%
2009-10
100%
62.3%
50%
60%
30%
30%
30%
10%
2008-09
<10
76.6%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2009-10
<10
78.2%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2008-09
100%
93%
85.1%
87.8%
61%
26.8%
7.3%
4.9%
2009-10
100%
93.8%
91.5%
85.4%
48.8%
36.6%
14.6%
0%
2008-09
100%
71.3%
68.9%
68.9%
29.2%
39.6%
27.4%
3.8%
2009-10
100%
75.6%
80.4%
73.6%
33.3%
40.3%
22.2%
4.2%
Student Group
School Year
Latino White 2008-09 White 2009-10 Multiracial 2008-09 Multiracial 2009-10 Limited 2008-09 English Proficient Limited 2009-10 English Proficient Students 2008-09 with Disabilities Students 2009-10 with Disabilities Economically2008-09 Disadvantaged Economically2009-10 Disadvantaged Migrant 2008-09 Migrant 2009-10
% Students Tested
State % Students Proficient
District % Students Proficient
School % Students Proficient
% Advanced (Level 1)
% % Partially % Not Proficient Proficient Proficient (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 4)
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
85.2% 87.5% 79.2% 80% 62.3%
90.3% 94.9% 80% 88.5% 68.5%
91.8% 95.9% 76.9% 72.7% 70.5%
73.8% 78.9% 46.2% 63.6% 29.5%
18% 17% 30.8% 9.1% 41%
6.6% 3.5% 15.4% 18.2% 25.6%
1.6% 0.6% 7.7% 9.1% 3.8%
100%
68.7%
79%
69.1%
30.9%
38.2%
26.5%
4.4%
100%
45.5%
38%
32.6%
11.6%
20.9%
46.5%
20.9%
100%
52.3%
70.6%
61.3%
16.1%
45.2%
29%
9.7%
100%
69%
71.7%
70%
34.4%
35.6%
23.8%
6.3%
100%
72.5%
81.6%
77.4%
44.5%
32.9%
18.5%
4.1%
100% <10
72.5% 68.1%
84.6% <10
83.3% <10
33.3% <10
50% <10
8.3% <10
8.3% <10
100% 100%
82.6% 82.2%
88.5% 85.1%
88.3% 86.2%
64.4% 58.8%
24% 27.4%
11.7% 12.7%
0% 1.1%
Grade: 07 All Students 2008-09 All Students 2009-10
Student Group Female Female Male Male Black or African American Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or Latino
School Year
% Students Tested
2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
State % Students Proficient 84.2% 82.6% 81.1% 81.7% 63.4%
District % Students Proficient 90.1% 86.2% 86.9% 84% 84.2%
School % Students Proficient 89.9% 88% 86.5% 84.3% 78.6%
% Advanced (Level 1) 68% 63% 60.1% 54.6% 42.9%
% Proficient (Level 2) 21.9% 25% 26.4% 29.7% 35.7%
% Partially Proficient (Level 3) 10.1% 11.4% 13.5% 14.1% 21.4%
% Not Proficient (Level 4) 0% 0.5% 0% 1.6% 0%
2009-10
100%
62.6%
75%
64.7%
35.3%
29.4%
35.3%
0%
2009-10
<10
78.5%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2008-09
100%
93.9%
88%
89.3%
60.7%
28.6%
10.7%
0%
2009-10
100%
93.2%
86.2%
87.5%
57.5%
30%
10%
2.5%
2008-09
100%
75.4%
76.7%
74.7%
42.5%
32.2%
25.3%
0%
2009-10
100%
75.3%
74.4%
75.7%
32.7%
43%
22.4%
1.9%
Student Group
School Year
White 2008-09 White 2009-10 Multiracial 2008-09 Multiracial 2009-10 Limited 2008-09 English Proficient Limited 2009-10 English Proficient Students 2008-09 with Disabilities Students 2009-10 with Disabilities Economically2008-09 Disadvantaged Economically2009-10 Disadvantaged Migrant 2008-09 Migrant 2009-10
% Students Tested 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
State % Students Proficient 87.9% 87.6% 79.6% 77% 66%
District % Students Proficient 94.3% 92.3% 91.1% 82.5% 75%
School % Students Proficient 95.1% 94.1% 95.8% 80% 75%
% Advanced (Level 1) 76.8% 77.5% 75% 46.7% 45.6%
% Proficient (Level 2) 18.3% 16.6% 20.8% 33.3% 29.4%
% Partially Proficient (Level 3) 4.9% 5.3% 4.2% 20% 25%
% Not Proficient (Level 4) 0% 0.5% 0% 0% 0%
100%
66%
71%
69.5%
24.4%
45.1%
28%
2.4%
100%
45.7%
56.5%
53.8%
20.5%
33.3%
46.2%
0%
100%
51.2%
56.5%
54.3%
19.6%
34.8%
41.3%
4.3%
100%
71.9%
79.8%
79.5%
48.6%
30.8%
20.5%
0%
100%
72.4%
77.2%
78.3%
39.7%
38.6%
20.7%
1.1%
100% 100%
72.3% 68.5%
75% 68.8%
80% 66.7%
60% 33.3%
20% 33.3%
20% 33.3%
0% 0%
100% 100% 100%
74.5% 70.3% 74.3%
87% 77% 90.6%
87.6% 77.8% 92.2%
59.7% 53.2% 62.1%
27.9% 24.7% 30.1%
9.7% 16.1% 7.2%
2.7% 6% 0.7%
Grade: 08 All Students 2008-09 All Students 2009-10 Female 2008-09
Student Group Female Male Male Black or African American Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or Latino White
School Year
% Students Tested
2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
100% 100% 100% 100%
State % Students Proficient 70.6% 74.8% 70% 51.6%
District % Students Proficient 80% 83.5% 74.1% 66.7%
School % Students Proficient 81.2% 83.6% 74% 58.3%
% Advanced (Level 1) 57.1% 57.6% 48.6% 50%
% Proficient (Level 2) 24.1% 26% 25.3% 8.3%
% Partially Proficient (Level 3) 14.7% 11.9% 17.8% 41.7%
% Not Proficient (Level 4) 4.1% 4.5% 8.2% 0%
2009-10
100%
44.7%
57.9%
61.5%
15.4%
46.2%
30.8%
7.7%
2008-09
<10
71.9%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2008-09
100%
89.4%
92.9%
90.2%
56.1%
34.1%
7.3%
2.4%
2009-10
100%
88.7%
74.5%
70.4%
44.4%
25.9%
22.2%
7.4%
2008-09
100%
64.5%
78.9%
80.4%
38%
42.4%
14.1%
5.4%
2009-10
100%
59.1%
59%
58.8%
34.1%
24.7%
29.4%
11.8%
2008-09
100%
80.8%
93.1%
94.6%
73.8%
20.8%
4.8%
0.6%
Student Group
School Year
White 2009-10 Multiracial 2008-09 Multiracial 2009-10 Limited 2008-09 English Proficient Limited 2009-10 English Proficient Students 2008-09 with Disabilities Students 2009-10 with Disabilities Economically2008-09 Disadvantaged Economically2009-10 Disadvantaged Migrant 2008-09 Migrant 2009-10
% Students Tested 100% 100% 100% 100%
State % Students Proficient 77.1% 70.4% 64.2% 57.1%
District % Students Proficient 86.8% 67.7% 81.4% 81.5%
School % Students Proficient 90.5% 66.7% 73.9% 82.9%
% Advanced (Level 1) 66.7% 46.7% 56.5% 32.9%
% Proficient (Level 2) 23.8% 20% 17.4% 50%
% Partially Proficient (Level 3) 7.1% 20% 17.4% 14.5%
% Not Proficient (Level 4) 2.4% 13.3% 8.7% 2.6%
100%
50.2%
58.6%
57.7%
35.2%
22.5%
26.8%
15.5%
100%
38.6%
50%
44.8%
17.2%
27.6%
41.4%
13.8%
100%
31.6%
41.9%
43.9%
12.2%
31.7%
34.1%
22%
100%
61.6%
80.1%
78.1%
43.8%
34.3%
17.5%
4.4%
100%
56.3%
65.8%
67.3%
36.9%
30.4%
22.6%
10.1%
100% 100%
64% 49.6%
92.9% 58.3%
100% 60%
30.8% 50%
69.2% 10%
0% 30%
0% 10%
100%
76.3%
85.7%
86.9%
49.2%
37.7%
9.4%
3.6%
Science Grade: 08 All Students 2008-09
Student Group All Students Female Female Male Male Black or African American Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or
School Year
% Students Tested
2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
State % Students Proficient 75.9% 77.2% 77% 75.4% 74.9% 50.5%
District % Students Proficient 82.8% 89.9% 84.4% 81.7% 81.1% 73.3%
School % Students Proficient 81.8% 92.2% 83.6% 82.4% 79.6% 75%
% Advanced (Level 1) 38.4% 49% 37.4% 49.4% 39.5% 25%
% Proficient (Level 2) 43.4% 43.1% 46.2% 33% 40.1% 50%
% Partially Proficient (Level 3) 14.5% 5.2% 14% 13.1% 15% 8.3%
% Not Proficient (Level 4) 3.8% 2.6% 2.3% 4.5% 5.4% 16.7%
2009-10
100%
50%
57.9%
53.8%
30.8%
23.1%
30.8%
15.4%
2008-09
<10
74.4%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2008-09
100%
87.3%
85.7%
85.4%
46.3%
39%
12.2%
2.4%
2009-10
100%
86.9%
80.9%
81.5%
29.6%
51.9%
18.5%
0%
2008-09
100%
63.9%
75.8%
76.9%
26.4%
50.5%
15.4%
7.7%
2009-10
100%
65%
73.8%
67.4%
18.6%
48.8%
25.6%
7%
Student Group
School Year
Latino White 2008-09 White 2009-10 Multiracial 2008-09 Multiracial 2009-10 Limited 2008-09 English Proficient Limited 2009-10 English Proficient Students 2008-09 with Disabilities Students 2009-10 with Disabilities Economically2008-09 Disadvantaged Economically2009-10 Disadvantaged Migrant 2008-09 Migrant 2009-10
% Students Tested
State % Students Proficient
District % Students Proficient
School % Students Proficient
% Advanced (Level 1)
% % Partially % Not Proficient Proficient Proficient (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 4)
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
83.5% 83.1% 74.3% 69.6% 48.3%
93.1% 89.2% 71% 81.4% 67.2%
95.2% 91.1% 66.7% 82.6% 67.1%
64.3% 52.1% 40% 26.1% 22.4%
31% 39.1% 26.7% 56.5% 44.7%
3.6% 7.7% 33.3% 8.7% 21.1%
1.2% 1.2% 0% 8.7% 11.8%
100%
48.3%
69%
63.4%
22.5%
40.8%
29.6%
7%
100%
42.5%
50.9%
53.6%
17.9%
35.7%
32.1%
14.3%
100%
42.3%
48.4%
46.5%
16.3%
30.2%
41.9%
11.6%
100%
61.9%
77.1%
77.9%
27.2%
50.7%
16.2%
5.9%
100%
63.1%
72.8%
71.2%
23.5%
47.6%
22.9%
5.9%
100% 100%
55.4% 51.4%
71.4% 66.7%
69.2% 70%
15.4% 30%
53.8% 40%
15.4% 10%
15.4% 20%
Michigan Merit Examination (MME) Student Group
School Year
% Students Tested
State % Students Proficient
District % Students Proficient
School % Students Proficient
% Advanced (Level 1)
% % Partially % Not Proficient Proficient Proficient (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 4)
No records to display.
MI-Access
Functional Independence Student Group
School Year % Students Tested
State % Students Proficient
District % Students Proficient
School % Students Proficient
% Surpassed % Attained % Emerging (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
English Language Arts Grade: 06 All Students 2008-09 All Students 2009-10
<10 <10
87.9% 88.2%
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
Student Group Female Male Male Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or Latino White
School Year % Students Tested 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
<10 <10 <10 <10
State % Students Proficient 90.3% 86.6% 86.5% 84.5%
District % Students Proficient <10 <10 <10 <10
School % Students Proficient <10 <10 <10 <10
% Surpassed % Attained % Emerging (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
2008-09
<10
88.3%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2009-10
<10
87.3%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2008-09
<10
89.4%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
87.7% 88.2% 89% 86.9% 86.9% 92.9%
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
2008-09
<10
87.9%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2009-10
<10
82.9%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
Grade: 07 All Students All Students Female Male Male Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or Latino
Student Group
2008-09 2009-10
<10 <10
State % District % School % % Surpassed % Attained % Emerging Students Students Students (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Proficient Proficient Proficient 89.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 90.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
91.1% 91.4% 91.4% 92.7% 90.9% 90.6% 95.2%
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
2008-09
<10
88.2%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2009-10 2008-09
<10 <10
93.5% 89.3%
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
All Students 2008-09 All Students 2009-10
<10 <10
83.1% 81.2%
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
White White
School Year % Students Tested
Grade: 08 All Students All Students Female Female Male Male Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino White Multiracial Mathematics Grade: 06
Student Group Female Male Male Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or Latino White
School Year % Students Tested 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
<10 <10 <10 <10
State % Students Proficient 81.4% 84.1% 82.3% 77.8%
District % Students Proficient <10 <10 <10 <10
School % Students Proficient <10 <10 <10 <10
% Surpassed % Attained % Emerging (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
2008-09
<10
82.2%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2009-10
<10
85.4%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2008-09
<10
85.6%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
72.7% 70.9% 69.7% 74.5% 72.2% 68%
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
2008-09
<10
76.4%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2009-10
<10
72.4%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
Grade: 07 All Students All Students Female Male Male Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or Latino
Student Group
2008-09 2009-10
<10 <10
State % District % School % % Surpassed % Attained % Emerging Students Students Students (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Proficient Proficient Proficient 76.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 74.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
83.6% 81.1% 80.4% 79.4% 85.4% 82.1% 88.2%
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
2008-09
<10
84%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2009-10
<10
81.7%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2009-10 2008-09
<10 <10
83.9% 75%
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
All Students 2008-09
<10
47.5%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
White White
School Year % Students Tested
Grade: 08 All Students All Students Female Female Male Male Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino Hispanic or Latino White Multiracial Science Grade: 08
Student Group All Students Female Female Male Male Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino White Multiracial
School Year % Students Tested 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
State % Students Proficient 52.2% 42.1% 50% 50.6% 53.5% 44.4%
District % Students Proficient <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
School % Students Proficient <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
% Surpassed % Attained % Emerging (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
2008-09
<10
35.3%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
2009-10 2008-09
<10 <10
60.9% 51.9%
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
Supported Independence Student Group
School Year % Students Tested
State % Students Proficient
District % Students Proficient
School % Students Proficient
% Surpassed % Attained % Emerging (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
English Language Arts Grade: 06 All Students 2008-09
<10
84.3%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
Student Group
2008-09 2008-09 2008-09
<10 <10 <10
State % District % School % % Surpassed % Attained Students Students Students (Level 1) (Level 2) Proficient Proficient Proficient 87% <10 <10 <10 <10 83% <10 <10 <10 <10 82.2% <10 <10 <10 <10
2008-09
<10
85.9%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
All Students 2009-10 Female 2009-10 Black or 2009-10 African American
<10 <10 <10
81.4% 87.4% 82.3%
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
2008-09 2008-09 2008-09 2008-09
<10 <10 <10 <10
87.7% 89.4% 86.8% 85%
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
2008-09
<10
90.5%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
Female Male Black or African American White
School Year % Students Tested
% Emerging (Level 3) <10 <10 <10
Grade: 07
Mathematics Grade: 06 All Students Female Male Black or African American White
Student Group
School Year % Students Tested
State % Students Proficient
District % Students Proficient
School % Students Proficient
% Surpassed % Attained % Emerging (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Grade: 07 All Students 2009-10 Female 2009-10 Black or 2009-10 African American
<10 <10 <10
87.2% 89.2% 86.6%
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
Participation Student Group
School Year % Students Tested
State % Students Proficient
District % Students Proficient
School % Students Proficient
No records to display.
MEAP-Access
% Surpassed % Attained % Emerging (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Student Group
School Year % Students Tested
State % Students Proficient
District % Students Proficient
School % Students Proficient
% Level 1
% Level 2
% Level 3
Reading Grade: 06 All Students 2009-10 Male 2009-10 Hispanic or 2009-10 Latino Limited 2009-10 English Proficient Economically 2009-10 Disadvantaged Migrant 2009-10
<10 <10 <10
48.3% 47.8% 39.1%
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10
42.2%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
44.3%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10 <10 <10
52.1% 56.2% 55.7%
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
Grade: 07 All Students 2009-10 Female 2009-10 White 2009-10 Mathematics Grade: 06
Student Group
School Year % Students Tested
All Students 2009-10 Female 2009-10 Male 2009-10 Hispanic or 2009-10 Latino Multiracial 2009-10 Limited 2009-10 English Proficient Economically 2009-10 Disadvantaged Migrant 2009-10
<10 <10 <10 <10
State % Students Proficient 47.7% 46.4% 48.5% 46.1%
District % Students Proficient <10 <10 <10 <10
School % Students Proficient <10 <10 <10 <10
% Level 1
% Level 2
% Level 3
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10
34.8% 53.4%
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10 <10
<10
48.1%
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10 <10 <10
47.2% 43.5% 50.6%
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
Grade: 07 All Students 2009-10 Female 2009-10 White 2009-10
2009-10 School-Level Accountability (AYP) Detail Reporting for Ottawa Area ISD, West Ottawa Public School District,
Harbor Lights Middle School Subject
% Tested (Goal 95%)
% Proficient for AYP*
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
99.1% 98.9%
93.9% 93.7%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
100.1% 100%
95.8% 96.3%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
100% 100.1%
96% 96.3%
97.7% 97.4%
88.4% 88%
All Students State
District
School
Black or African American State English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
Subject
% Tested (Goal 95%)
% Proficient for AYP*
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
100% 100%
94.8% 91.4%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
100% 100%
93.3% 96.7%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
99.2% 99%
93.2% 92.4%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
<30 <30
<30 <30
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
<30 <30
<30 <30
District
School
American Indian or Alaska Native State
District
School
Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander
Subject
% Tested (Goal 95%)
% Proficient for AYP*
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
99.5% 99.6%
96.8% 97.5%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
100% 99.8%
95.4% 96.6%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
98.2% 99.1%
95.5% 95.5%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
99.3% 98.9%
91.3% 92.4%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
100.7% 100.5%
91.7% 93.9%
State
District
School
Hispanic or Latino State
District
School
Subject English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
% Tested (Goal 95%) 100.8% 100.8%
% Proficient for AYP* 93.5% 92.9%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
99.4% 99.3%
95.3% 95.1%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
99.8% 99.7%
97.9% 97.7%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
100% 100%
97.4% 98%
102.4% 102.3%
93.5% 94.3%
White State
District
School
Multiracial State English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics District
Subject English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
% Tested (Goal 95%) 100.4% 99.6%
% Proficient for AYP* 96.4% 95.5%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
100% 100%
96.9% 96.9%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
123.6% 126.3%
86.9% 92.3%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
119.5% 120%
90.5% 93.7%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
118.6% 122.4%
90.8% 89.3%
School
Limited English Proficient State
District
School
Students with Disabilities State
Subject English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
% Tested (Goal 95%) 102.6% 102.2%
% Proficient for AYP* 73.1% 76.5%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
112.3% 112.1%
81.7% 85.3%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
115.9% 115.9%
83.9% 86%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
102.6% 102.5%
90.6% 91.1%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
103.5% 103.8%
93.7% 94.7%
English Language Arts / Reading Mathematics
107.5% 108.8%
93.3% 94.5%
District
School
Economically Disadvantaged State
District
School
Note: 467 Recently arrived LEP students took part in the State’s ELPA instead of the MEAP/MME/MI-Access. * AYP Targets (Annual Measurable Objectives) Graduation Rate (High Schools only) (Goal 80%) All Students State 75.39% District 77.39% Black or African American State 56.59% District 56% American Indian or Alaska Native State
Graduation Rate (High Schools only) (Goal 80%) 65% District <10 Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander State 84.47% District 69.84% Hispanic or Latino State 59.94% District 66.94% White
Graduation Rate (High Schools only) (Goal 80%) State 81.85% District 84.23% Multiracial State 71.12% District <10 Limited English Proficient State 65.51% District 58.89%
Graduation Rate (High Schools only) (Goal 80%) Students with Disabilities State 57.61% District 58.67% Economically Disadvantaged State 59.8% District 55.47% Attendance Rate (Goal 90%) All Students State
Attendance Rate (Goal 90%) 94.7% District 96.1% School 96.3% Black or African American State 91% District 94.6% School 94.4% American Indian or Alaska Native State
Attendance Rate (Goal 90%) 93.7% District 93.9% School 94.5% Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander State 96.5% District 97.1% School 98.1% Hispanic or Latino State
Attendance Rate (Goal 90%) 94.1% District 95.4% School 95.6% White State 95.7% District 96.4% School 96.6% Multiracial State
Attendance Rate (Goal 90%) 94.8% District 95.5% School 95.2% Limited English Proficient State 94.6% District 95.8% School 96.3% Students with Disabilities State
Attendance Rate (Goal 90%) 93.5% District 95.5% School 95.7% Economically Disadvantaged State 94.8% District 96% School 96.4% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. ** More information regarding AYP can be found at the following link: http://www.michigan.gov/mde/0,1607,7-140-22709_22875---,00.html
Michigan Annual AYP Objectives
Michigan Annual AYP Objectives for Reading/ELA School Year 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Grade 3
50% 50% 60% 60% 70% 78% 86% 93% 100%
Grade 4 38% 38% 38% 48% 48% 48% 59% 59% 69% 77% 85% 92% 100%
Grade 5
46% 46% 57% 57% 68% 76% 84% 92% 100%
Grade 6
45% 45% 56% 56% 67% 75% 83% 91% 100%
Grade 7 31% 31% 31% 43% 43% 43% 54% 54% 66% 74% 82% 91% 100%
Grade 8
41% 41% 53% 53% 65% 73% 82% 91% 100%
Grade 11 42% 42% 42% 52% 52% 52% 61% 61% 71% 79% 86% 93% 100%
Grade 8 31% 31% 31% 43% 43% 43% 54%
Grade 11 33% 33% 33% 44% 44% 44% 55%
Michigan Annual AYP Objectives for Mathematics School Year Grade 3 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 59% 2006-07 59% 2007-08 67%
Grade 4 47% 47% 47% 56% 56% 56% 65%
Grade 5
53% 53% 62%
Grade 6
50% 50% 60%
Grade 7
46% 46% 57%
School Year 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Grade 3 67% 67% 75% 83% 91% 100%
Grade 4 65% 65% 74% 82% 91% 100%
Grade 5 62% 62% 71% 81% 90% 100%
Grade 6 60% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Grade 7 57% 57% 67% 78% 89% 100%
Grade 8 54% 54% 66% 77% 89% 100%
Grade 11 55% 55% 67% 78% 89% 100%
2009-10 School-Level Accountability (AYP) Status Reporting for Ottawa Area ISD, West Ottawa Public School District, Harbor Lights Middle School School AYP Status Title 1 Status
No
AYP ELA/Reading Status Met
AYP Mathematics Status Met
AYP Overall Status Met
Education Yes School Report Card Improvement Grade Status A N/A
Years in Improvement 0
December, 2009 School-Level Teacher Quality Reporting for Ottawa Area ISD, West Ottawa Public School District, Harbor
Lights Middle School Other
B.A.
M.A.
Ph.D
Professional 0 34 37 0 Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School Professional Qualifications are defined by the State and may include information such as the degrees of public school teachers (e.g., percentage of teachers with Bachelors Degrees or Masters Degrees) or the percentage of fully certified teachers Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers 0% in the School with Emergency Certification School Aggregate Percentage of Core Academic Subject Elementary and Secondary 0% School Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
Michigan Report Card for the National Assessment of Educational Progress NAEP 2009 Grade 4 Mathematics Results Reporting Group Percent of Students All Students 100 Male 50 Female 50 National Lunch
Percent below Basic Percent Basic 22 43 22 41 22 45
Percent Proficient Percent Advanced 30 5 30 7 29 4
Reporting Group Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced Program Eligility 43 36 47 16 1 Eligible 56 11 40 40 9 Not Eligible ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Info not available Race Ethnicity White 71 14 43 37 6 Black 20 52 39 9 0 Hispanic 5 29 51 19 1 Asian Amer/Pacif Isl 3 13 32 36 19 American Indian 1 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Unclassified 1 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Student classified as having a disability 12 42 39 17 2 SD 88 19 44 31 6 Not SD Student is an English Language Learner 3 48 40 11 1 ELL 97 21 43 31 5 Not ELL ‡ Reporting Standards not met. Note: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 2009 Mathematics Achievement.
NAEP 2009 Grade 8 Mathematics Results Reporting Group Percent of Students All Students 100 Male 51 Female 49 National Lunch
Percent below Basic Percent Basic 32 37 31 37 33 38
Percent Proficient Percent Advanced 24 7 24 8 24 5
Reporting Group Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced Program Eligility 38 50 37 12 1 Eligible 62 21 38 31 10 Not Eligible ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Info not available Race Ethnicity White 74 23 40 29 8 Black 18 68 27 4 1 Hispanic 4 38 45 15 2 Asian Amer/Pacif Isl 2 11 30 31 28 American Indian 1 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Unclassified ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Student classified as having a disability 10 75 22 2 1 SD 90 27 39 27 7 Not SD Student is an English Language Learner 2 58 32 10 0 ELL 98 32 37 24 7 Not ELL ‡ Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 2009 Mathematics Achievement.
NAEP 2009 Grade 4 Reading Results Reporting Group Percent of Students All Students 100 Male 50 Female 50 National Lunch
Percent below Basic Percent Basic 36 34 39 35 32 34
Percent Proficient Percent Advanced 23 6 21 5 26 8
Reporting Group Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced Program Eligility 43 52 33 13 2 Eligible 57 24 36 31 10 Not Eligible # ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Info not available Race Ethnicity White 71 28 36 28 8 Black 19 65 26 7 1 Hispanic 5 49 34 15 2 Asian Amer/Pacif Isl 3 21 37 25 17 American Indian 1 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Unclassified 1 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Student classified as having a disability 10 66 24 8 3 SD 90 32 36 25 7 Not SD Student is an English Language Learner 3 65 26 9 1 ELL 97 35 35 24 7 Not ELL # Rounds to zero ‡ Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2009 Reading Assessment.
NAEP 2009 Grade 8 Reading Results Reporting Group Percent of Students All Students 100 Male 51 Female 49
Percent below Basic Percent Basic 28 41 33 42 23 41
Percent Proficient Percent Advanced 28 3 23 2 32 4
Reporting Group Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced National Lunch Program Eligility 37 44 41 14 1 Eligible 62 18 42 36 4 Not Eligible ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Info not available Race Ethnicity White 74 21 32 32 3 Black 18 54 37 9 # Hispanic 4 40 34 24 2 Asian Amer/Pacif Isl 2 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ American Indian 1 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Unclassified 1 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Student classified as having a disability 9 73 22 4 # SD 91 23 43 30 3 Not SD Student is an English Language Learner 2 60 33 8 # ELL 98 27 42 28 3 Not ELL # Rounds to zero ‡ Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2009 Reading Assessment.
Grade
4 8
Subject
Math Reading Math Reading
Participation Rate for Students with Disabilities
82.08 72.05 76.39 70.72
Standard Error
2.771 2.592 2.561 3.239
Participation Rate for IEP Students
81.98 72.01 76.21 70.46
Standard Error
2.786 2.63 2.578 3.298
Participation Rate for Limited English Proficient Students 91.89 81.16 93.13 85.15
Standard Error
3.063 3.53 4.12 4.505
