IHEHGBDGB LDJC G JK E H @E ,
. ,
:
O
,
O ,
,
DA@JDF@ C IBDGB O
.
*
*
, * M
* , * *
*
,
, N
,
* ,
Outline • Introduction
• Nonlinear superposition • New problem in wireless charging
• Algorithm design
• Related works • Weight-Greedy Picking
• Experiments • Conclusion and future works
Nonlinear Superposition • Radio interference occurs • Two chargers may strengthen or weaken each other
Nonlinear superposition • Charging model • !"# = '(*
%& cos(3# 4 +, ⁄-.&
:
+ 6# − 29;?|A = ? ∫[D# (4)]F G. = > ∑I+∈A : K L + > ∑I+∈A ∑IM ∈AIM NI+ * +,
:+, P:M, O cos(29 ) ; +, *M,
The difference between these two charging model
Our problem in wireless charging • Variable: scheme chargers on/off state in every charging period. • Objective: minimize charging periods. • Constraint: charge each sensor with energy no less than E.
Related work • Computation ahead Have to calculate the charging utility of each charger set at every sensor node in advance. As a result, the complexity of this step grows exponentially with the number of chargers, making it much more complex than previously thought.
Weight-Greedy Picking First find a MCS: pick charger with the maximum weight, and the remove chargers and repeat; Add new chargers: add the charger which has the most effective
A simple Example S1
S2
S3
C1
3
0
0
C2
2
3
2
C3
0
3
3
C4
0
0
2
C2,C3
2
0
1
C3,C4
0
3
5
C1,C2
4
3
2
C2,C4
4
3
0
C2,C3,C4
2
0
2
An example of a MCS
Experiments
Conclusion and Future Work • Nonlinear superposition • Adjustable initial phases • Different duration of each charging period
!
[email protected]
