Pavement Management System Update FINAL REPORT (ELECTRONIC COPY)
County of San Benito PROJECT NO. 160122 August 2016
Pavement Engineering Inc. You can ride on our reputation
County of San Benito 2016 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS Section
Description
I.
Executive Summary (PDF Page 3) Introduction Work Performed Findings Budget Analysis Conclusions and Recommendations
II.
Background (PDF Page 13) Pavement Design Basics Pavement Deterioration Typical Pavement Defects Pavement Maintenance Procedures Pavement Rehabilitation Procedures
III.
Pavement Management System Specifics (PDF Page 25) Background (StreetSaver) System Assumptions System Inventory Pavement Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) Units Costs Annual Pavement Maintenance Rehabilitation Program Visual Evaluations System Reports System Updates
IV.
(PDF Page 32) Reference Reports Street Name Alphabetical Listing Street Name PCI
V.
GIS Toolbox (PDF Page 71)
Appendix A
Summarized System Information (PDF Page 74) Network Summary Statistics Network Replacement Cost Decision Tree
Appendix B
Budget Scenarios (5 & 10 Year) (PDF Page 92) Needs / Zero Budget Current Budget Maintain Current PCI Increase PCI by 5 Points
Appendix C
Definitions (PDF Page 131)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The County of San Benito currently maintains approximately 337.63 centerline miles of roads representing 39,315,883 square feet of pavement asset with a replacement value of approximately $389,002,000 as calculated by StreetSaver. Pavement Engineering Inc. (PEI) updated the County’s Pavement Management System using the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's (MTC) StreetSaver program. The purpose of a Pavement Management System is to track inventory, store work history and furnish budget estimates to optimize funding for improving the county’s pavement system. INTRODUCTION A Pavement Management System has several distinctive uses: • As a budgeting tool, a Pavement Management System uses treatment costs that are based on recently bid projects, by the participating agency, so that budgets reflect historical costs for the area. • As an inventory tool, a Pavement Management System provides a quick and easy reference for pavement areas and use. • As a pavement condition record, a Pavement Management System provides age, load-related, non-load related and climate-related pavement condition and deterioration information. The Pavement Management System uses pavement deterioration curves, based on nationwide research, which allow the program to predict a pavement’s future condition. A Pavement Management System is not capable of providing detailed engineering designs for a street. The Pavement Management System instead helps the user identify candidate streets for potential repair and maintenance. Project level pavement analysis and engineering is an essential feature of future pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects. Additional investigation, or project level analysis, can optimize the County’s pavement management dollars. Project level engineering examines the pavements in significantly more detail than the visual evaluation required for the Pavement Management System Update and optimizes designs for all of the peculiar constraints of a set of project streets. When updating the Pavement Management System for the County of San Benito, PEI had three primary goals: 1. Provide an accurate and complete inventory of the County’s pavements and their condition. 2. Identify and quantify maintenance and rehabilitation needs and costs for the street system. 3. Provide on-going training and assistance
Page |1
WORK PERFORMED Pavement Distress Survey and Database Update For this update, PEI performed inspections on all County-maintained streets. inspections were completed in June 2016.
Field
PEI measured the following distress types as part of our review: alligator cracking (fatigue), block cracking, distortions, longitudinal & transverse cracking, patching & utility cut patching, rutting / depressions, weathering, and raveling. All the collected data were entered into the County’s StreetSaver® database. As part of our field review, all the streets were measured to confirm lengths and widths. Lengths were measured using a vehicle-mounted electronic measuring device and widths were measured using a hand-held measuring wheel. Measurement discrepancies were tabulated and reviewed with the County to determine if corrections were needed. PEI performed a quality control (QC) check on our work. PEI’s QC check usually consists of performing a field review of any street segment where the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) showed a decrease of 10 or more points or an increase of 5 or more PCI points when compared to the last inspection for the same road segment. PEI reviewed the 10 percent of the system. Each segment was visually reviewed to determine if the StreetSaver® calculated PCI was representative of the observed overall pavement condition for that road segment. Variations found were re-inspected and the street’s PCI was recalculated. FINDINGS The updated Pavement Management System showed that the County's overall average PCI is 37. The breakdown by functional classification is as follows: Functional Class Centerline Miles
Area Percent of System Average PCI (Square Feet)
Arterial
42.87
6,719,299
17.1%
46
Collector
230.06
25,769,240
65.5%
33
Local
64.71
6,827,344
17.4%
33
Total
337.63
39,315,883
100%
37
Page |2
The pie chart below shows the percentage of each functional classification and the bar chart on the following page shows function classification by PCI ranges.
Residentials 17.4% 6,827,344
Arterials 17.1% 6,719,299
Collectors 65.54% 25,769,240
Page |3
The breakdown by PCI point range is shown below.
Total System by Functional Class by PCI 13,500,000
12,225,427 31.10%
12,000,000
Arterials
9,600,877 24.42%
10,500,000
Collectors
Area (SqFt)
9,000,000
Local 7,500,000 6,000,000 4,500,000 3,000,000 1,500,000
5,587,511 14.21%
5,366,036 13.65% 3,352,320 8.53% 1,400,000 603,138 1.53% 872,654 3.56% 116,545 2.22% 0.30%
191,375 0.49%
0 100-91
90-81
80-71
70-61
60-51
50-41
40-31
30-21
20-11
10-0
PCI Range
CONDITION
PCI RANGE
% OF TOTAL
SQUARE FEET
EXCELLENT
100-91
0.30%
116,545
GOOD
90-71
3.75%
1,475,792
FAIR
70-51
12.09%
4,752,320
POOR
50-31
38.07%
14,966,913
FAILED
30-0
45.79%
18,004,313
The analysis shows that 83.86% of the County's pavement is in Poor to Failed condition. Details of each street segment are provided in the Reference Reports.
Page |4
BUDGET ANALYSIS StreetSaver® uses a decision tree to model the decision-making process that agencies follow to select a maintenance or rehabilitation strategy. The decision tree contains "branches" for each functional classification, surface type and condition category. Jurisdictions can outline their maintenance and rehabilitation strategy by choosing a treatment for each branch. Decision Tree Unit Prices As a minimum, recent bid tabulations should be used to determine the appropriate unit costs. Further, the unit costs include other costs such as design, construction management, contingencies or other related construction costs (ADA ramps, curb & gutters, striping etc.) to form a more comprehensive unit cost for the selected treatments. For the County of San Benito the unit costs, on the following table, were used:
TREATMENT
ARTERIAL
COLLECTOR
LOCAL
(COST/ SQYD)
(COST/ SQYD)
(COST/ SQYD)
CRACK SEAL (LF)
$1.32
$1.32
$1.32
$3.96
$2.97
$2.97
$13.66
$13.66
$13.66
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
$31.42
$31.42
HEAVY REHAB
$61.48
$47.82
$47.82
RECONSTRUCT
$124.02
$81.84
$81.84
LIGHT MAINTENANCE HEAVY MAINTENANCE
StreetSaver assigns a treatment action and estimated cost to each street segment based on the pavement's current PCI. For this update, PEI analyzed several scenarios, which are summarized below. Unconstrained or Needs Budget As an initial starting point, it is always helpful to calculate the overall needs of the entire system. For the “Needs” analysis, the PMS computes the next recommended treatment for each street segment, the year the treatment would be applied and the estimated cost of the treatment. The total “Needs” cost for 5 years is $312,016,065. Spending this amount of money would bring the total system to a PCI of 88 over the next 5 years. We have found that this level of funding is typically far beyond available resources
Page |5
To gain a more realistic analysis of the impact on various levels of funding, PEI prepared additional budget scenarios. These include: • • • • •
Unconstrained needs Amount of funds needed to maintain current PCI Impact of the current funding amount Budget needed to increase the overall PCI level by 5 points What happens if zero dollars are spent on the City’s street system?
Page |6
For each of these scenarios, PEI performed Five-year projections, represented graphically below.
5 YEAR PROJECTION 88
85
Needs Budget (S1) AVG $62.4M/Yr
75
Increase PCI by 5 (S4) AVG $20.2M/Yr
PCI Range
65
Maintain PCI (S2) AVG $16M/Yr
55 45
42 35
37
37
25
20
Projected Budget (S3) $500K/Yr Zero Budget (S5)
15 -
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Year
A brief summary of the Five-year scenarios are as follows: Scenario 1 (S1):
Represents the budget required based on the “Needs” of the system. Assumes all pavements are treated at their optimum timing. (Approximately - $62.4M/yr; increases the PCI from 37 to 88.
Scenario 2 (S2):
Amount of funding to maintain current PCI of 37 – 16M/yr
Scenario 3 (S3):
Impact of the projected funding amount (averaging around $500K/yr) - Using 7% of the money for preventative maintenance, the current PCI would decline from 37 to 20, a 17 point overall drop.
Scenario 4 (S4):
Budget to increase overall PCI level by 5 points - $20.2M/yr (raises the PCI from 37 to 42).
Scenario 5 (S5):
Represents the impact to the PCI if Zero dollars are spent.
The full report for various budget scenarios can be found in Appendix B.
Page |7
For each of these scenarios, PEI performed Ten-year projections, represented graphically below.
10 YEAR PROJECTION 87
85
Needs Budget (S1) AVG $34.6M/Yr
75
Increase PCI by 5 (S4) AVG $14.5M/Yr
PCI Range
65
55
45
42 35
37 37
25
Maintain PCI (S2) AVG $12.2M/Yr Projected Budget (S3) $500K/Yr Zero Budget (S5)
15
7
5 -
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Year
A brief summary of the 10-year scenarios are as follows: Scenario 1 (S1):
Represents the budget required based on the “Needs” of the system. Assumes all pavements are treated at their optimum timing. (Approximately - $34.6M/yr; increases the PCI from 37 to 87).
Scenario 2 (S2):
Amount of funding to maintain current PCI of 37 - $12.2M/yr
Scenario 3 (S3):
Impact of the current funding amount (averaging around $500K/yr) - Using 7% of the money for preventative maintenance, the current PCI would decline from 37 to 8, a 29 point overall drop.
Scenario 4 (S4):
Budget to increase overall PCI level by 5 points - $14.5M/yr (raises the PCI from 37 to 42).
Scenario 5 (S5):
Represents the impact to the PCI if Zero dollars are spent.
The full report for various budget scenarios can be found in Appendix B. Page |8
The following graphs illustrates the consequences of the County’s overall weighted PCI based on the projected funding.
10 Year Current Budget Consequences $500K/ year Budget $500.0 37
33
Deferred Maintenance
$400.0
$400M
35
$416M
$373M
29
30
$339.5M
$350.0
24
$307M
$256M
20
$300.0 $250.0
$222M
$200.0
25 20
17 14
$172M
11 $120M
PCI
$450.0
$150.0
40
$444M
15
10 8
10
$100.0 5
$50.0 $-
0 2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Year Deferred Maintenance (Millions fo Dollars)
2022
2023
2024
2025
Pavement Condition Index
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This Executive Summary provides a review of the 2016 Pavement Management System Update performed by PEI. PEI inspected all of the County maintained roads and performed QC on 10 percent of the road segments in the County. The average overall PCI for the County is 37. 84% of the County's pavement is in Poor to Failed condition. To maintain the system at its current overall PCI of 37, the County will need to spend an average of $12.2M annually over the next ten years. Maintaining the projected funding level of approximately $500K annually will result in a PCI loss of 29 points in ten years to a PCI of 8. A review of the County’s street system, by functional classification, shows that the Arterial streets have the highest average PCI of 46, the Collector streets follow with an average PCI of 33, and the Local streets have an average PCI of 33. As a general rule, agencies typically try to keep their arterials in the best condition because they carry the bulk of the traffic and loading, followed by collectors, then the local streets. Moving forward, PEI recommends the County carefully evaluate the overall annual budget to determine the amount it wants to commit to pavement maintenance and rehabilitation Page |9
projects. We recommend the County set priorities for each functional classification and perhaps certain streets within each classification. This Pavement Management System will assist the County in its efforts to monitor treatments and track their effectiveness and help the County in setting future priorities and treatment policies. PEI suggests the County update it’s Pavement Management System on a regular basis and review entire system every two to three years. As the County maintains and updates its Pavement Management System, the program will become a valuable tool in its efforts to maximize performance and minimize the spending for pavements. In addition, the County will find the Pavement Management System is a great tool to communicate to the public and decision makers the condition of the pavement and the impact that the allocated funding is or will have on the County’s pavement in the future.
P a g e | 10
BACKGROUND This section is intended to introduce important pavement design definitions and calculations as a background for understanding the Pavement Management System (PMS) assumptions.
PAVEMENT DESIGN BASICS Pavements are a structural support system generally considered to act like a beam. But unlike beams in buildings, which generally have static loads, the pavement structure is flexed many times from traffic loading. Cars and light trucks have little impact on the pavement structure. Larger/Heavier trucks have very significant impacts on the pavement due to the high axle weights. The impact of trucks is measured in equivalent single 18,000-pound axle loads (EALs). The total EALs are converted into a design Traffic Index (TI). As an example, a design TI of 5 is equal to 7,160 EALs. A Design TI of 8 is equal to 372,000 EALs. Therefore, the design TI is the total number of EALs that the pavement will support before it begins to fail, regardless of the passage of time. Normally for a new pavement, the EALs over a 20-year period are used. For rehabilitation procedures such as overlays, 10 years is generally used. The other element of pavement design is the support of the beam. The support is provided by the sub-grade soils. The support value is designated by the R-value test. Using the design TI and R-value, the pavement designer chooses various materials to construct the structural section. The most common pavement section is a thin layer of asphalt concrete over aggregate base(s). Many options are available depending on specific project requirements and conditions. The design methods used in California is based on a 50 percent reliability. This means that the average pavement life of all pavements constructed using the design procedure will last the design life. It also means that about half will not last that long and the other half will last longer. To express this concept, a design life is often expressed in a span of years, such as 17 to 23 years for 20-year design life.
PAVEMENT DETERIORATION Pavement deteriorates from two processes. There are fatigue and aging. The processes occur simultaneously. In a well-designed and constructed pavement, the two processes result in the need to rehabilitate the pavement at approximately the same time. This is called the design life. The design life for most new pavements is 20 years. Each aging process has its own set of pavement defects, which are related to the process. Fatigue The first deterioration process is fatigue from heavy axle loads. As the pavement structure flexes or bends from heavy wheel loads, the asphalt concrete layer’s ability to flex is 1
consumed. With sufficient bending, the asphalt concrete layer begins to break at the bottom. This cracking progresses upward until it reaches the surface and appears as alligator cracking. These areas are repaired by removal and replacement of the asphalt concrete in the affected areas. These repairs are commonly called digouts. As the pavement structure, its supporting soils, and the precise loading from wheel loads vary, so does the time it takes for alligator cracking to appear. As alligator cracking appears, the pavement is repaired with digouts. Generally, when total cumulative quantity of digouts reaches approximately 10 percent of the total area, the pavement is considered to have reached its design life and requires major rehabilitation. Aging The major element of the pavement structure that ages is the asphalt concrete layer. To a minor extent, aggregate bases can age if contaminated by fine soil particles, which are transported from the subsoil into the aggregate base. Asphalt concrete is composed of aggregates and asphalt cement. The aggregates used are generally of fair quality and do experience some breakdown over time. Aggregate aging problems need to be addressed in maintenance procedures. The asphalt concrete binder ages as well. As the asphalt binder ages, it loses volume through loss of volatile components in the asphalt. As the volume decreases, the pavement will progressively crack from the resulting tensile strain in the layer. Normally, these cracks first show up as transverse cracks. They also show up as weak areas such as paving joints. These cracks widen and increase over time until the pavement has a checkerboard appearance. The aging process also causes the pavement to become more brittle. The increased stiffness results in additional cracking from loaded vehicles. This load induced cracking from the brittleness of the asphalt concrete is very similar to fatigue cracking in appearance. The major agent for deterioration of the asphalt concrete binder is oxygen. The carrier of the oxygen is water. Water enters the pavement either from the surface or as water vapor from underneath.
2
TYPICAL PAVEMENT DEFECTS StreetSaver identifies eight different Asphalt Concrete distress types. These are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Alligator Cracking (Fatigue) Block Cracking Distortions Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking Patching and Utility Cut Patching Rutting and Depression Raveling Weathering
These defects are common to virtually the entire pavement as aging progresses. Age cracking begins with longitudinal and transverse cracking and progresses to block shrinkage cracking. For purposes of understanding the levels of these distresses, the condition level descriptions from the rating manual are included herein:
Alligator Cracking (Fatigue) Description: Alligator or fatigue cracking is a series of interconnecting cracks caused by fatigue failure of the asphalt concrete surface under repeated traffic loading. Cracking begins at the bottom of the asphalt surface (or stabilized base) where tensile stress and strain are highest under wheel load. The cracks propagate to the surface initially as a series of parallel longitudinal cracks. After repeated traffic loading, the cracks connect, forming many sided, sharp-angled pieces that develop a pattern resembling chicken wire or the skin of an alligator. The pieces are generally less than 0.6 m (2 ft) on the longest side. Alligator cracking occurs only in areas subjected to repeated traffic loading, such as wheel paths. Therefore, it would not occur over an entire area unless the entire area were subject to traffic loading (pattern-type cracking that occurs over an entire area not subjected to loading is called “block cracking,” which is not a loadassociated distress). Severity Levels: L
Fine, longitudinal hairline cracks running parallel to each other with no, or only a few interconnecting cracks. The cracks are not spalled.
M
Further development of light alligator cracks into a pattern or network of cracks that may be lightly spalled.
3
H
Network or pattern cracking has progressed so that the pieces are well defined and spalled at the edges. Some of the pieces may rock under traffic.
Block Cracking Description: Block cracks are interconnected cracks that divide the pavement into approximately rectangular pieces. The blocks may range in size from approximately 0.3 by 0.3 m (1 by 1 ft) to 3 by 3 m (10 by 10 ft). Block cracking is caused mainly by shrinkage of the asphalt concrete and daily temperature cycling (which results in daily stress/strain cycling). It is not load-associated. Block cracking usually indicates that the asphalt has hardened significantly. Block cracking normally occurs over a large portion of the pavement area, but sometimes will occur only in non-traffic areas. This type of distress differs from alligator cracking in that alligator cracks form smaller, many-sided pieces with sharp angles. Also, unlike block cracks, alligator cracks are caused by repeated traffic loadings and therefore found only in traffic areas (i.e., wheel paths).
Severity Levels: L
Blocks are defined by low-severity* cracks.
M
Blocks are defined by medium-severity* cracks.
H
Blocks are defined by high-severity* cracks.
*See definitions of longitudinal transverse cracking.
Distortions Description: Distortions are usually caused by corrugations, bumps, sags and shoving. They are localized abrupt upward or downward displacements in the pavement surface, a series of closely spaced ridges and valley or localized longitudinal displacements of the pavement surface. Distortions affect ride quality. Severity Levels: L
Distortion produces vehicle vibrations, which are noticeable, but no reduction in speed is necessary for comfort or safety and/or individual distortions cause the vehicle to bounce slightly, but create little discomfort.
4
M
Distortion produces vehicle vibrations, which are significant, and some reduction in speed is necessary for safety and comfort.
H
Distortion produces vehicle vibrations, which are so excessive that speed must be reduced considerably for safety and comfort.
Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking (Non-PCC Slab Joint Reflective) Description: Longitudinal cracks are parallel to the pavement’s centerline or laydown direction. They may be caused by: 1. 2.
A poorly constructed paving lane joint. Shrinkage of the AC surface due to low temperature or hardening of the asphalt and/or daily temperature cycling.
3.
A reflective crack caused by cracking beneath the surface course, including crack in PCC slabs.
4.
Decreased support or thickness near the edge of the pavement.
Transverse cracks extend across the pavement at approximately right angles to the pavement centerline or direction of laydown. These may be caused by conditions (2) and (3) above. These types of cracks are not usually load-associated. Severity Levels: L
One of the following conditions exists: (1) non-filling crack width is less than 10 mm (3/8 in.) or (2) filled crack of any width (filler in satisfactory condition).
M
One of the following conditions exists: (1) non-filled crack width is greater than or equal to 10 mm and less than 75 mm (3/8 to 3 in.) (2) non-filled crack is less than or equal to 75 mm (3 in.) surrounded by light and random cracking, or (3) filled crack is of any width surrounded by light random cracking.
H
One of the following conditions exists: (1) any crack filled or non-filled surrounded by medium or high severity random cracking, (2) non-filled crack greater than 75 mm (3 in.) or 5
(3)
A crack of any width where approximately 100 mm (4 in.) of pavement around the crack is severely broken.
Patching and Utility Cut Patching Description: A patch is an area of pavement that has been replaced with new material to repair the existing pavement. A patch is considered a defect no matter how well it is performed (a patched area or adjacent area usually does not perform as well as an original pavement section). Generally, some roughness is associated with this distress. Severity Levels: L
Patch is in good condition and satisfactory. Ride quality* is rated as low severity or better.
M
Patch is moderately deteriorated and/or ride quality* is rated as medium severity.
H
Patch is badly deteriorated and/or ride quality* is rated as high severity. Needs replacement soon.
*Ride quality is defined in the severity levels of distortions.
Rutting and Depressions Description: A rut is a surface depression in the wheel paths. Pavement uplift may occur along the sides of the rut, but in many instances, ruts are noticeable only after a rainfall when the paths are filled with water. Rutting stems from a permanent deformation in any of the pavement layers or sub-grades, usually caused by consolidated or lateral movement of the materials due to traffic load. Significant rutting can lead to major structural failure of the pavement. Depressions are localized areas where the pavement structure is lower than the surrounding area but the transition is not abrupt enough to be considered a distortion. They are often referred to as “bird baths”.
Severity Levels: Mean Rut or Depression Depth; L
1/2" to less than 1” (13 to 25mm). 6
M
1” to less than 2” (25 to 50mm).
H
equal to or greater than 2” (over 50mm).
Raveling Description: Raveling is the dislodging of coarse aggregate particles. Raveling may be caused by insufficient asphalt binder, poor mixture quality, insufficient compaction, segregation, or stripping. Coarse aggregate refers to the predominant coarse aggregate size of the asphalt mix, and aggregate clusters refers to when more than one adjoining coarse aggregate piece is missing. If in doubt about a severity level, three representative areas of one square yard each (square meter) should be examined and the number of missing aggregate particles/clusters is counted. Severity Levels: M
Considerable loss of coarse aggregate greater than 20 per square yard (square meter), and/ or clusters of missing coarse aggregate are present.
H
Surface is rough and pitted, and it may be completely removed in places.
Weathering Description: Weathering is the wearing away of the asphalt binder and fine aggregate matrix. Coarse aggregate refers to predominant coarse aggregate size of the asphalt mix. Loss or dislodging of coarse aggregate is covered under Raveling. Surface wear is normally caused by oxidation, inadequate compaction, insufficient asphalt content, excessive natural sand, surface water erosion, and traffic. Weathering occurs faster in areas with high solar radiation. Severity Levels: L
Asphalt surface beginning to show signs of aging which may be accelerated by climatic conditions loss of fine aggregate mix is noticeable and may be accompanied by fading of the asphalt color. Edges of the aggregates are beginning to be exposed (less than 0.05 inches or 1 mm).
7
M
Loss of the fine aggregate matrix is noticeable and the edges of the coarse aggregate have been exposed up to 1/4th of the width (of the longest side) of the coarse aggregate due to the loss of fine aggregate matrix.
H
Edges of the coarse aggregate have been exposed greater than 1/4th of the width (of the longest side) of the coarse aggregate. There is considerable loss of fine aggregate matrix leading to potential or some loss of coarse aggregate.
8
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES Pavement maintenance procedures are designed to slow the pavement aging process. Mainly, the procedures are designed to protect the pavement from the adverse effects of water and to some extent vehicle traffic. Maintenance procedures, which protect the pavement from aging, are crack sealing, digouts, slurry seals, and cape seals. When pavements have extensive cracking and are beyond their design life, interim holding measures including skin patches and thin overlays are used as a stop gap prior to major rehabilitation. The following outlines some of the more common types of maintenance procedures: Crack Sealing Crack sealing prevents surface water from getting beneath the asphalt concrete layer into the aggregate bases. Crack sealing is generally performed using hot rubberized crack sealing material. The procedure includes routing small cracks, cleaning and sealing. Digouts Digouts are small areas of deteriorated pavements, which are removed and replaced with new asphalt concrete. Pavement removal is accomplished by cold planning or saw cutting and excavation. New asphalt is installed in at least two lifts. The digout depth is determined depending on the street type and construction. Slurry Seals Slurry seals consist of a combination of fine aggregate and emulsified oil. A new type of slurry seal called Rubberized Asphalt Slurry (RAS) is in the development stage. Currently, the cost of RAS is 2 to 3 times as much as a conventional slurry seal, which makes the product economically unattractive. Slurry seals are used when the existing pavement surface is severely raveled. Cape Seals Cape seals consist of a chip seal over coated with a slurry seal. A chip seal is an application of small angular rock (chips) approximately 1/4" to 3/8” in a maximum size embedded into a thick application of asphalt emulsion. Most chip seals incorporate polymer modified binders. Cape seals are used on residential and collector streets to maintain a pavement, which may need an overlay, but there are not sufficient funds available. Chip seals are placed over low to moderate alligator cracks and block shrinkage cracking. Due to the distress covered by the chip seal, small areas of disbanding or failure may occur and will require patching. Cape sealed surfaces are fairly coarse compared to new paving. Due to this characteristic, they may not be acceptable to some segments of the public. 9
Interim Holding Measures or “Stop Gap” in StreetSaver® Terms Interim holding measures or stop gap treatments are used to “hold” the pavement together until funds become available for major rehabilitation. The common holding measures used by City include skin patches and thin overlays. Skin patches are thin lifts of fine asphalt concrete placed over deteriorated areas. Thin maintenance overlays are placed to hold the surface together. The asphalt concrete layer is generally 3/4 to 1 inch think and 3/8 inch aggregate is used.
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROCEDURES Pavement rehabilitation consists of procedures used to restore the existing pavement quality or to add additional structural support to the pavement. Rehabilitation procedures include conventional overlays; pulverization and resurfacing; ARHM (asphalt rubber hot mix) overlays; AC removal and replacement (Mill and Fill); and reconstruction. The following outlines some of the more common types of rehabilitation procedures: Conventional Overlays Conventional overlays generally consist of surface preparation, pavement fabric and varying thicknesses of asphalt concrete. Surface preparation can consist of crack filling, pavement repairs of base failures and leveling courses. Pavement fabric is often used as a water inhibiting membrane and to retard reflective cracking. Care must be used with fabric to avoid intersections with heavy truck breaking, steep grades (generally over 8 percent), and areas where subsurface water might be trapped. The overlay thickness is determined by the structural requirement of the deflection analysis and reflective cracking criteria. The reflective cracking criteria requires the thickness of the overlay to be a minimum 1/2 the thickness of the existing bonded layers. Pavement fabric can account for 0.10 ft of asphalt for reflective cracking criteria if the structural requirements from the deflection analysis are met. Conventional overlays have an expected service life of 7 to 13 years if they are designed to meet structural and reflective cracking criteria and are well constructed.
10
Pulverization and Resurfacing Pulverization and resurfacing is an alternative to conventional overlays for streets that are structurally adequate but exhibit sufficient cracking to warrant improvement to the asphalt surface. Pulverization and resurfacing are an intermediate step between overlays and reconstruction. The existing asphalt concrete is recycled into aggregate base and the recycled base increases the total structural section. The surface is re-graded to conform to flush facilities similar to the way the pavement is keycut for overlays. The re-grading allows for some improvement to the cross section and profile. This method eliminates the stress history and cracking of the old asphalt concrete pavement, thus eliminating negative impacts on the new asphalt concrete surface. Some instability can be encountered when the pulverization method is used. PEI typically recommends budgeting 5 to 10 percent of the pulverized sub-grade area for stabilization. Stabilization can be performed using 6-inch deep lift asphalt concrete. Pulverization and resurfacing has a life expectancy of 13 to 18 years. The life expectancy is slightly less than full reconstruction because some residual deficiencies in thickness or quality of the unaffected layers may still exist. Additional testing is necessary to determine if pulverization is a viable alternative. This testing includes measuring the existing structural section and testing the native soil for bearing capacity (R-value). RHMA Overlays RHMA is the shortened reference for Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt. This new material uses crumb rubber mixed with traditional asphalt binders to produce a more flexible paving material than conventional dense graded hot mix asphalt (HMA). Caltrans has developed design criteria for use of this material based on accelerated performance testing using its dual wheel accelerated pavement testing equipment. The Caltrans criteria allows RHMA to be used in a one to two ratio to conventional hot mix asphalt. Thus 1 inch of RHMA is equal to two inches of conventional hot mix asphalt. This is true for both structural and reflective cracking criteria. RHMA costs approximately 1-3/4 times as much as conventional asphalt and provides a similar service life to that of conventional hot mix asphalt, 7 to 13 years. RHMA is generally only feasible when vertical constraints such as curb and gutter restrict the thickness of the overlay. RHMA typically has more open surface than conventional hot mix asphalt and is more difficult to obtain a high quality finished product.
11
AC Removal and Replacement (Mill and Fill) On some thick asphalt concrete pavements, the most economical approach to rehabilitating the pavement is to remove some of the existing asphalt concrete surface, which matches the existing profile. The replacement material can be either conventional hot mix asphalt (HMA) or RHMA, depending on the design criteria. In other cases, due to drainage or other physical constraints, additional thickness cannot be placed. If the underlying base is sufficient to support anticipated loading, the asphalt layer can be removed and replaced. Depending on existing conditions, this method should have a life of 15 to 20 years. Reconstruction When the pavement has severe cross section deficiencies or requires significant structural strengthening, reconstruction may be the only alternative. Generally, existing pavement materials are recycled and incorporated into the new pavement structure. Structural section material alternatives include treated soils, full depth asphalt concrete, recycled materials and Portland cement concrete.
12
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SPECIFICS This section discusses the characteristics of the Pavement Management System and its application for the County of San Benito. BACKGROUND (STREETSAVER) During the early years of Pavement Management software development, many companies developed private software packages focused on management of municipal street systems. Though these programs were versatile and sophisticated, the user was also dependent upon the software vendor for training, program updates, and software servicing. Many of the vendors had difficulty maintaining their software, leaving agencies stranded after making a substantial investment. In 1982, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) completed a study of local road and street maintenance needs and revenue short falls in the San Francisco Bay Area. The results of the study indicated that local jurisdictions were spending only 60 percent of funds required to maintain roads in a condition considered adequate. This indicated a need to improve pavement maintenance and rehabilitation techniques and practices. A committee was formed to evaluate pavement management efforts. At approximately the same time, six public works directors reviewed a proposal to develop a prototype Pavement Management System (PMS); however, it was felt that the proposed system was too complex. This group strongly emphasized that simplicity was the most important objective to be developed in a PMS if it was to be adopted and used by cities and counties. In 1983, a consultant was retained to assist MTC in determining PMS needs, PMS resources, and problems. In addition, they were to develop three basic elements of a standardized prototype PMS: a pavement condition index (PCI), effective maintenance treatments for the Bay Area, and a network level assignment procedure. The result was the first version of the MTC PMS. Since that time the program has evolved into StreetSaver. Today, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for California's San Francisco Bay Area uses StreetSaver to help local cities and counties better allocate resources, predict the future condition of their pavements at different levels of funding, and demonstrate the effects of underfunded road programs. The Bay Area was one of the first regions in the country to implement a pavement management system that is used by nearly all of its localities. Using StreetSaver, cities and counties can plan and manage road improvement projects, document budget needs and shortfalls, and use the collected data to build support for additional transportation funding. (FHWD) StreetSaver manages a collection of related data organized for easy storage and retrieval. The StreetSaver program includes a database comprised of several sets of related data ("tables") that contain information about the street network in the 1
jurisdiction. This information includes pavement condition, the available maintenance/rehabilitation treatments and their costs, and the history of the network. Based on this information, budget analyses are performed. A budget analysis allows the user to project network maintenance and rehabilitation needs, and costs to evaluate the consequences of various budget allocation alternatives. Alternatives can be evaluated in terms of maintenance and rehabilitation that can actually be performed, future pavement condition, and deferred costs. For some agencies, use of the StreetSaver program is cyclical. For others, pavement management is integrated into an ongoing effort to manage their street networks. Implementation There are a number of steps involved in implementing an effective Pavement Management System. These tasks should be completed on a periodic basis. These tasks include: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Collect pavement condition and maintenance/rehabilitation data. Enter re-inspection data and/or applied maintenance and rehabilitation information. Check/update maintenance treatment definitions and pavement category definitions. Calculate Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Evaluate system and current Maintenance/Rehabilitation strategies. Determine Budget needs and if necessary develop alternate Budget Summaries. Present analysis outputs to funding bodies. Acquire funds and apply maintenance/rehabilitation treatments.
SYSTEM ASSUMPTIONS The goal of the Pavement Management System is to furnish budgetary amounts in order to achieve system wide improvements in the overall pavement condition. The goal of project engineering is to obtain the maximum economical affect for a given subset of the system to be maintained. Using the Pavement Management System, management is able to realistically budget for economically maintaining the City’s pavement system. Annually updating maintenance activity and costs keeps the system current.
2
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION (M&R) UNIT COSTS The reliability and accuracy of any PMS is based on the information contained in its Decision Tree. The Decision Trees contain treatments used by the City and the costs incurred to put that treatment down. This cost is not just what is paid to the contractor but should include all the “Soft Costs” incurred by the City. Soft Costs can include the surface preparation, engineering cost, soils testing and inspection. Even if these tasks are done “in-house”, the inclusion in combination with the construction costs will tend to show the “true picture” of the cost of a specific project. Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Unit Costs The following costs were used to develop the indicated budget numbers for each street segment PEI reviewed. The costs include miscellaneous work such as transitions, striping, dig outs, etc. The costs are averages. Small programs will have higher unit costs and large programs will have lower unit costs. The larger the annual program size, the better the economies of scale. Timing is also important. Bidding the work in early spring will result in significantly lower prices than bids solicited in the late summer or fall. If small packages are used, costs could be 25 to 50 percent higher. The unit costs include a 15% allowance to account for engineering design fees and inspection and a 10% contingency. These prices are in today’s dollars (2016) and do not account for inflation. PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION UNIT COSTS
TREATMENT CRACK SEAL (LF)
ARTERIAL
COLLECTOR
LOCAL
(COST/ SQYD)
(COST/ SQYD)
(COST/ SQYD)
$1.32
$1.32
$1.32
$3.96
$2.97
$2.97
$13.66
$13.66
$13.66
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
$31.42
$31.42
HEAVY REHAB
$61.48
$47.82
$47.82
RECONSTRUCT
$124.02
$81.84
$81.84
LIGHT MAINTENANCE HEAVY MAINTENANCE
*All Costs Include Surface Preparation, Design and Inspection 3
Decision Trees / Treatment Strategies The Decision Trees are broken down into two main areas; Preventive Maintenance (PM) and Rehabilitation. StreetSaver® makes preventive maintenance a top priority. The longer a segment can be kept in good condition the lower the overall cost of its treatments. Preventive Maintenance addresses the sections that have a PCI of 71 and greater. This area is further broken down to specific treatments that could be better termed as Crack Sealing, Surface Treating and Restoration Treatments. The Decision Tree allows the user to program these treatments on a cyclical basis. As part of this cyclical process, once a road has reached the point where it can no longer be maintained by a crack seal or a surface seal the program will shift to a Restoration Treatment. The program uses this treatment to restore the pavement in long term budgeting scenarios to the Very Good category. The Decision Tree for Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation was reviewed with the County of San Benito and updated by PEI. The decision tree customizes the logic for how and what maintenance and rehabilitation treatments StreetSaver® selects. Five general pavement treatment categories were used to account for the various treatments in the decision tree: reconstruction, heavy overlays, light overlays, heavy maintenance, light maintenance and no action. Specifying a general treatment category allows the user to stay focused on a budget level analysis rather than moving to a project level analysis. The PMS software assumes average construction and material quality. Pavement life is very sensitive to materials and workmanship quality. Poor quality new construction may result in up to a 50 percent loss in the pavement life. In other words, poor quality new construction may last 10 to 15 years, whereas excellent quality construction may last 20 to 30 years. Investing in quality, both in design and construction, provides significant returns in extended pavement life resulting in lowered annual maintenance costs. The Decision Tree for the County of San Benito can be found in Appendix A of this report.
4
ANNUAL PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE / REHABILITATION PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT The PCI range of 0 to 100 is broken down into five categories for budget calculation purposes. StreetSaver default PCI breakpoints were used in the development of the County of San Benito Pavement Management System. These breakpoints are as follows:
Maintenance Treatment Type
PCI Category
PCI Ranges
Preventive Maintenance Rehabilitation
I II
Rehabilitation
III
Rehabilitation Rehabilitation
IV V
100 – 70 70> - 50 (Non-load related distresses) 70> - 50 (Non-load related distresses) 50> - 25 25> - 0
When a pavement section is identified for maintenance or rehabilitation, a user defined network-level cost category for a pavement of that functional class, type and condition is used to determine the needed funds for that section. For sections falling within the preventive maintenance category (PCI 100 - 70), a time sequence is used to identify the appropriate treatment and cost. For those sections falling into rehabilitation (PCI <70), the PCI is used to determine the repair category for a pavement section. The repair category is combined with functional classification (as a surrogate for traffic) and surface type (as a surrogate for structural adequacy) to identify the appropriate treatment and cost. The treatment and cost identified for the section is a network-level budget planning treatment and is generally considered as a cost category for budgeting purposes rather than an actual treatment. Some sections will require more money than estimated, some will require less. A project-level analysis is used to determine the actual treatment to be used for a given section based on condition, structural capacity and other factors. The funding needs are summed for all sections needing work for each year of the analysis period to determine the annual budget needs. The needs analysis provides a list of sections needing work over the selected analysis period and an estimate of the 5
funds needed. In StreetSaver, this analysis period is 5 years. It identifies maintenance and rehabilitation needs without considering funding constraints, i.e. the Needs Analysis is unconstrained by the available budget. StreetSaver identifies candidate sections and funds needed to provide the level of service to meet agencydefined goals. When an agency has a considerable backlog of maintenance and repair needs, the first year needs will include the bulk of sections needing work. From a funding standpoint, this may appear unrealistic; however, the needs analysis is only the first step in planning and programming. The information from the needs analysis is generally best presented to management as the total 5 year needs or the average needs per year of the 5 year period. Few agencies will be able to meet the first year needs as developed by the program. The StreetSaver Needs Analysis provides information on the condition of the network over the analysis period with and without application of the treatments. Since the application of treatments assume no limit on funds, this can be considered the upper limit of condition that could be reached by the agency and the condition without treatment can be considered the lower limit. StreetSaver uses a ranking process based on cost-effectiveness concepts. Basically, the longer a pavement is in good condition, the more benefit the user gets from the pavement. This can be approximated by the area under the PCI-time curve. The larger that area, the longer the pavement provides the desired level of service. That area is divided by annualized costs per unit area. This ratio is weighted for different usage so that arterial streets are selected for repair before collectors in the same condition, which are selected for repair before residential/locals in the same condition. Sections of pavements that provide the best service for the least money are then selected as those that should be repaired first. StreetSaver provides a ranked listing based on this cost-effectiveness analysis. StreetSaver also shows the condition with and without treatment, the estimated costs for each section, the calculations used to determine the ranking, and a listing of sections not recommended for treatment. VISUAL EVALUATIONS Jacob Seely, and David Tran of PEI’s technical staff evaluated all of the pavements. The streets were rated based on the StreetSaver system described in the Background. Once the data was entered into the program, Ted Moranda completed a quality assurance review of the system and verified the results in the field. The street inventory was based on visual evaluations. SYSTEM UPDATES 6
The Pavement Management System is a dynamic program. It is expected that the City will continue to visually rate the street network and update the database at least every three years. In addition to the visual review, the City should update the database by adding new streets incorporated into the City as well as new maintenance and rehabilitation work performed to a particular street segment.
7
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
ACQUISTAPACE RD
58-010
FAIRVIEW RD
END
9
2750
RMiC
ANZAR RD
5-010
CARR AVE
COLE RD
40
1960
RMaC
ANZAR RD
5-020
COLE AVE
FOREST RD
39
3550
RMaC
ANZAR RD
5-030
FOREST RD
CANNON RD
47
6625
RMaC
ANZAR RD
5-040
CANNON RD
SERLE RD
28
5280
RMaC
ANZAR RD
5-050
SERLE RD
SAN JUAN HWY
33
4890
RMaC
AROMITAS RD
18-010
QUARRY RD
COP
39
3115
RMiC
AROMITAS RD
18-020
COP
ANZAR RD
0
3650
RMiC
ARROYO SECO DR
59A-010
COMSTOCK
END
20
2128
RL
BARNES LN
161-010
SANTA ANA RD
END
36
1299
RL
BARNHEISEL RD
143-010
SHWY 156
END
11
3818
RL
BENITO RD
65-010
MCMAHON
SPRING GROVE RD
16
1695
RMiC
BEST RD
79-010
SHWY 25
0.109 N/SHWY 25
2
576
RMiC
BEST RD
79-020
0.109 N/SHWY 25
HARBERN WAY
21
3400
RMiC
BEST RD
79-030
HARBERN WAY
JOHN SMITH RD
19
3668
RMiC
BETABEL RD
163-010
NORTH END
HWY 101
39
4940
RL
BETABEL RD
163-020
HWY 101
SOUTH END
54
4055
RL
BEVERLY DR
77B-010
SUNNYSLOPE RD
SOUTH END
60
270
RL
BIXBY RD
30-010
SHWY 156
FREITAS RD
23
2660
RMaC
BIXBY RD
30-020
FREITAS RD
DUNCAN AVE
52
2700
RMaC
BLOSSOM LN
89-010
END
SOUTHSIDE RD
21
2534
RL
BOLADO RD
91-010
SOUTHSIDE RD
QUIEN SABE RD
31
3045
RMiC
BOLADO RD
91-020
QUIEN SABE RD
SHWY 25
39
2500
RMiC
BONNIEVIEW RD
128-010
SUNNYSLOPE RD
END
27
1764
RL
1
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
BREEN RD
38-010
SHWY 156
END
21
4425
RL
BRIGGS RD
141-010
N HWY 25
SHWY 25
17
2769
RL
BRIGGS RD
141-020
S HWY 25
WRIGHT RD
14
1048
RL
BROWN RD
7-010
CANNON RD
MERRIL RD
51
4250
RL
BROWNS VALLEY RD
99-010
PANOCHE RD
END OF PAVEMENT
47
500
RMiC
BUENA VISTA RD
34-010
WEST END
HWY 156 W/S
23
3290
RMaC
BUENA VISTA RD
34-020
HWY 156 E/S
4535 E/O HWY 156
46
4535
RMaC
BUENA VISTA RD (1/2 CITY)
34-030
4535' E/O HWY 156
MILLER RD
77
3565
RMaC
BUENA VISTA RD (1/2 CITY)
34-040
MILLER RD
LOCUST AVE
3275
RMaC
CAGNEY RD
39-010
BREEN RD
NORTH END
34
2825
RL
CANNON RD
8-010
HWY 101
CHATEAU DR
42
2500
RMiC
CANNON RD
8-020
CHATEAU DR
BROWN ROAD
37
3325
RMiC
CANNON RD
8-030
BROWN RD
ANZAR RD
28
4320
RMiC
CARPENTER DR
162-010
FALLON RD
MCMAHON RD
17
4578
RMiC
CARR AVE
14-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
ARRIBA DR
24
4175
RMaC
CARR AVE
14-020
ARRIBA DR
ANZAR RD
39
4325
RMaC
CHAPPELL RD
72-010
75' N/O MAPLE ST
PRIMAVERA DR
66
590
RMiC
CHAPPELL RD
72-030
PACIFIC WAY
END
13
710
RMiC
CHAPPELL RD - (1/2 CITY)
72-020
PRIMAVERA DR
PACIFIC WAY
65
910
RMiC
CHURCHILL RD
57-010
END
FAIRVIEW RD
21
3125
RMiC
CIENEGA RD
83-010
UNION RD
COP 1475' S/O UNION RD
50
1460
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-020
COP 1475' S/O UNION RD
CIENEGA RD EXTENSION
95
550
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-030
CIENEGA RD EXTENSION
MONTE BELLO CT
37
2525
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-040
MONTE BELLO CT
HOSPITAL RD
40
2900
RMaC
2
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
CIENEGA RD
83-050
HOSPITAL RD
HIDDEN VALLEY RD
60
3915
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-060
HIDDEN VALLEY RD
1 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
21
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-070
1 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
2 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
42
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-080
2 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
3 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
38
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-090
3 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
4 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
49
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-100
4 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
5 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
32
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-110
5 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
6 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
49
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-120
6 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
7 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
35
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-130
7 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
8 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
39
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-140
8 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
9 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
49
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-150
9 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
10 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
48
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-160
10 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
E/S PCC BRIDGE
42
4015
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-170
E/S PCC BRIDGE
THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
54
4850
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-180
THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
1 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
46
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-190
1 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
2 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
32
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-200
2 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
3 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
44
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-210
3 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
4 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
36
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-220
4 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
AIRLINE HWY
22
1400
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-400
NEVADA ST
PROMISE WAY
42
1350
RMaC
CIENEGA RD EXTENSION
83-300
0.4M S/ UNION ROAD
HOSPITAL RD
92
3115
RMaC
COALINGA RD
109-010
SHWY 25
1 MILE
23
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-020
1 MILE
2 MILE
26
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-030
2 MILE
3 MILE
27
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-040
3 MILE
4 MILE
40
5280
RMiC
3
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
COALINGA RD
109-050
4 MILE
5 MILE
22
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-060
5 MILE
6 MILE
28
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-070
6 MILE
7 MILE
27
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-080
7 MILE
8 MILE
28
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-090
8 MILE
9 MILE
20
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-100
9 MILE
10 MILE
30
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-110
10 MILE
11 MILE
16
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-120
11 MILE
12 MILE
22
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-130
12 MILE
13 MILE
22
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-140
13 MILE
14 MILE
18
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-150
14 MILE
15 MILE
14
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-160
15 MILE
16 MILE
31
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-170
16 MILE
17 MILE
22
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-180
17 MILE
18 MILE
23
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-190
18 MILE
19 MILE
22
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-200
19 MILE
20 MILE
17
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-210
20 MILE
21 MILE
19
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-220
21 MILE
22 MILE
16
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-230
22 MILE
23 MILE
21
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-240
23 MILE
24 MILE
21
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-250
24 MILE
FRESNO COUNTY LINE
28
4870
RMiC
COLE RD
11-010
ANZAR RD
1 MI S/O ANZAR RD
51
5280
RMiC
COLE RD
11-020
1 MI S/O ANZAR RD
RICARDO DR
32
5600
RMiC
COLE RD
11-030
RICARDO DR
SAN JUAN RD
85
3750
RMiC
4
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
COMSTOCK RD
59-010
FAIRVIEW RD
ASUYMAS CT
32
3875
RMiC
COMSTOCK RD
59-020
ASUYMAS CT
CANYON DR
54
4300
RMiC
COMSTOCK RD
59-030
CANYON DR
1 MI E/O CANYON DR
19
5280
RMiC
COMSTOCK RD
59-040
1 MI E/O CANYON DR
2 MI E/O CANYON DR
20
5280
RMiC
COMSTOCK RD
59-050
2 MI E/O CANYON DR
END
15
5716
RMiC
COTTONWOOD RD
100-010
PANOCHE RD
1 MI E/O PANOCHE
46
5280
RL
COTTONWOOD RD
100-020
1 MI E/O PANOCHE RD
2 MI E/O PANOCHE RD
78
5280
RL
COUNTY LABOR CAMP RD
41-010
SOUTHSIDE RD
650' S/O SOUTHSIDE RD
50
650
RL
COWDEN RD
90-010
HOSPITAL RD
END
47
3880
RL
CRESTVIEW LN
146-010
VALLEY VIEW RD
END
78
1056
RL
D STREET - TP
129A-010 FIFTH ST
FOURTH ST
22
350
RL
DOOLING RD
68A-010
ROSA MORADA RD
FALLON RD
18
4552
RMiC
DUNCAN AVE
26-010
LUCY BROWN LN
BIXBY RD
52
5280
RMiC
EL CAMINO PARAISO
156-010
HILLCREST RD
END
71
1300
RL
EL TORO DR
42-010
CL N / HILLCREST
N / POPPYLANE
38
1759
RL
ENTERPRISE RD
85-010
SOUTHSIDE RD
HWY 25
31
5245
RMiC
F STREET - TP
129F-010 3RD STREET
NORTH END
18
1352
RL
F STREET - TP
129F-020 END
QUIEN SABE RD
20
626
RL
FAIRVIEW RD
53-010
SAN FELIPE RD
LUDIS LN
66
5190
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-020
LUDIS LN
HWY 156
50
1960
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-030
HWY 156
LOS VIBORAS
38
4098
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-040
LOS VIBORAS
ACQUISTAPACE RD
44
2510
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-050
ACQUISTAPACE RD
SPRING GROVE RD
27
3507
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-060
SPRING GROVE RD
FALLON RD
39
3545
RPA
5
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
FAIRVIEW RD
53-070
FALLON RD
ROSA MORADA RD
48
3070
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-080
ROSA MORADA RD
DIXIE DR
36
5700
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-090
DIXIE DR
MCCLOSKY RD
33
3450
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-100
MCCLOSKY RD
SANTA ANA RD
25
4775
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-110
SANTA ANA RD
HILLCREST RD
24
3115
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-120
HILLCREST RD
SUNNYSLOPE RD
54
2668
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-130
SUNNYSLOPE RD
JOHN SMITH RD
34
2334
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-140
JOHN SMITH RD
OLD RANCH RD
27
3417
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-150
OLD RANCH RD
HWY 25
58
2539
RPA
FALLON RD
60-010
HOLLISTER CITY LIMIT
SCAGLIOTTI RD
36
2920
RMaC
FALLON RD
60-020
SCAGLIOTTI RD
GRANT RD
52
3613
RMaC
FALLON RD
60-030
GRANT RD
FAIRVIEW RD
43
3255
RMaC
FALLON RD
60-040
FAIRVIEW RD
CARPENTER DR
31
4530
RMiC
FALLON RD
60-050
CARPENTER DR
SPRING GROVE RD
37
2900
RMiC
FIFTH STREET - TP
129C-010 SHWY 25
D STREET - TP
39
450
RL
FIFTH STREET - TP
129D-010 F STREET
SOUTHSIDE RD
20
227
RL
FIRST STREET - TP
129G-010 END
SHWY 25
40
375
RL
FLINT RD
32-010
HWY 156
FREITAS RD
40
2675
RL
FLINT RD
32-020
FREITAS RD
NORTH END
33
1338
RL
FLYNN RD
44-010
HWY 25
COUNTY LINE
52
830
RMiC
FOOTHILL RD
55-010
ORCHARD RD
END
15
5725
RL
FOREST RD
19-010
ANZAR RD
SCHOOL RD
55
2400
RMiC
FOURTH ST
160-010
SAN JUAN HOLLISTER RD
SBT RIVER
36
4050
RPA
SHWY 25
32
360
RL
FOURTH STREET
129B-010 D STREET - TP
6
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
FRAZIER LAKE RD
47-010
SHORE RD
1 MI N/O SHORE RD
41
5280
RMaC
FRAZIER LAKE RD
47-020
1 MI N/O SHORE RD
2 MI N/O SHORE RD
61
5280
RMaC
FRAZIER LAKE RD
47-030
2 MI N/O SHORE RD
3 MI N/O SHORE RD
59
5280
RMaC
FRAZIER LAKE RD
47-040
3 MI N/O SHORE RD
SCL CO LN
56
2102
RMaC
FREITAS RD
31-010
BIXBY RD
FLINT RD
49
5280
RMaC
FREITAS RD
31-020
FLINT RD
MITCHELL RD
33
4700
RMaC
FRYE LANE
51-010
SHORE RD
SOUTH END
21
3180
RMiC
GARDEN AVE
16-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
END
33
480
RL
GARDENIA LN
73B-010
SANTA ANA RD
SOUTH END
54
740
RL
GRANT RD
62-010
FALLON RD
NORTH END
21
4784
RL
GRASS VALLEY RD
87-010
CIENEGA RD
1 MI W/O CIENEGA RD
20
5280
RL
GRASS VALLEY RD
87-020
1 MI W/O CIENEGA RD
END
19
4150
RL
HARBERN WAY
79A-010
END
BEST RD
18
2398
RL
HIGHLAND DR
124-010
FARRAGOT DR
SUNNYSLOPE RD
17
1200
RL
HILL TOP RD
135-010
VALLEY VIEW RD
EAST END
13
507
RL
HILLCREST RD
76-010
CL .04 E/BUSBY CT
CL 0.3M W/FAIRVIEW RD
84
3532
RPA
HILLSIDE RD
140-010
SAN JUAN CYN RD NORTH
SAN JUAN CYN RD SOUTH
39
4340
RL
HOSPITAL RD
84-010
CIENEGA RD
EAST END
28
2331
RMiC
HOSPITAL RD
84-020
WEST END
SOUTHSIDE RD
78
1445
RMiC
HUDNER LN
46-010
HWY 25
RR TRACKS
31
4550
RL
HUDNER LN
46-020
RR TRACKS
END COUNTY LINE
25
830
RL
JOHN SMITH RD
78-010
FAIRVIEW RD
COP
48
2450
RMaC
JOHN SMITH RD
78-020
COP
BEST RD
89
5230
RMaC
JOHN SMITH RD
78-030
BEST RD
COP E/O LANDFILL ENTRANCE
87
4240
RMaC
7
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
JOHN SMITH RD
78-040
COP E/O LANDFILL ENTRANCE
1 MI E/LANDFILL ENT.
24
5280
RMaC
JOHN SMITH RD
78-050
1 MI E/LANDFILL ENT.
2 MI E/LANDFILL ENT.
26
5280
RMaC
JOHN SMITH RD
78-060
2 MI E/LANDFILL ENT.
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
43
3620
RMaC
KING CITY RD
113-010
MONTEREY CO LINE
1 MI E MO CO LN
31
5280
RMiA
KING CITY RD
113-020
1 MI E MO CO LN
2 MI E MO CO LN
29
5280
RMiA
KING CITY RD
113-030
2 MI E MO CO LN
3 MI E MO CO LN
37
5280
RMiA
KING CITY RD
113-040
3 MI E MO CO LN
4 MI E MO CO LN
29
5280
RMiA
KING CITY RD
113-050
4 MI E MO CO LN
5 MI E MO CO LN
40
5280
RMiA
KING CITY RD
113-060
5 MI E MO CO LN
HWY 25
41
3240
RMiA
KT ROAD
139-010
THOMAS RD
SOUTH END
37
2900
RL
LADD LANE
136-010
SOUTHSIDE RD
SOUTH END
78
680
RL
LAKE ROAD
48-010
SHORE RD
NORTH END
10
4901
RL
LEWIS CREEK RD
133-010
SHWY 25
1 MI E/O HWY 25
44
5280
RL
LEWIS CREEK RD
133-020
1 MI E/O HWY 25
2 MI E/O HWY 25
36
5280
RL
LEWIS CREEK RD
133-030
2 MI E/O HWY 25
3 MI E/O HWY 25
29
5280
RL
LEWIS CREEK RD
133-040
3 MI E/O HWY 25
4 MI E/O HWY 25
37
5280
RL
LEWIS CREEK RD
133-050
4 MI E/O HWY 25
5 MI E/O HWY 25
45
5280
RL
LEWIS CREEK RD
133-060
5 MI E/O HWY 25
END CO RD
34
1723
RL
LIMEKILN RD
95-010
CIENEGA RD
1 MI S/ CIENEGA RD
34
5280
RL
LIMEKILN RD
95-020
1 MI S/ CIENEGA RD
SOUTH END
31
2400
RL
LITTLE MERRILL RD
10-010
ROCKS RD
NORTH END
23
1730
RL
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-010
PANOCHE RD
1 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
22
5280
RMaC
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-020
1 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
2 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
11
5280
RMaC
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-030
2 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
3 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
17
5280
RMaC
8
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-040
3 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
4 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
17
5280
RMaC
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-050
4 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
5 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
27
5280
RMaC
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-060
5 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
6 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
23
5280
RMaC
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-070
6 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
FRESNO CO LN
23
1033
RMaC
LIVE OAK RD
137-010
HWY 25
WEST END
29
1483
RL
LOMA VISTA AVE
145-010
VALLEY VIEW RD
END
18
1051
RL
LONE TREE RD
69-010
FAIRVIEW RD
MAGLADRY RD
35
2650
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-020
MAGLADRY RD
1 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
46
5280
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-030
1 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
2 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
34
5280
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-040
2 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
3 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
17
5280
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-050
3 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
4 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
18
5280
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-060
4 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
5 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
19
5280
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-070
5 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
6 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
17
5280
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-080
6 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
7 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
19
5280
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-090
7 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
8 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
12
5280
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-100
8 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
9 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
14
5280
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-110
9 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
10 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
20
5280
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-120
10 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
11 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
8
820
RMiC
LONOAK/KING CITY RD
152-010
MON CO LN WEST
1 MI E/O MON CO LN
21
5280
RMiA
LONOAK/KING CITY RD
152-020
1 MI E/O MON CO LN
2 MI E/O MON CO LN
20
5280
RMiA
LONOAK/KING CITY RD
152-030
2 MI E/O MON CO LN
3 MI E/O MON CO LN
26
5280
RMiA
LONOAK/KING CITY RD
152-040
3 MI E/O MON CO LN
4 MI E/O MON CO LN
23
5280
RMiA
LONOAK/KING CITY RD
152-050
4 MI E/O MON CO LN
MON CO LN EAST
17
3240
RMiA
LOS VIBORAS RD
56-010
FAIRVIEW RD
JENNY LN
35
2850
RMiC
9
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
LOS VIBORAS RD
56-020
FAIRVIEW RD
END
35
2907
RMiC
LOVERS LANE RD
50-010
SHORE RD
1 MI N/O SHORE RD
31
5280
RMiC
LOVERS LANE RD
50-020
1 MI N/O SHORE RD
2 MI N/O SHORE RD
33
5280
RMiC
LOVERS LANE RD
50-030
2 MI N/O SHORE RD
SANTA CLARA CO LINE
35
1485
RMiC
LUCY BROWN LN
25-010
HWY 156
OLYMPIA AVE
37
3905
RMaC
LUCY BROWN LN
25-020
OLYMPIA AVE
SAN JUSTO RD
49
1725
RMaC
LUCY BROWN LN
25-030
SAN JUSTO RD
END
13
975
RL
MAGLADRY RD
70-010
RODRIQUEZ CT
LONE TREE RD
63
3650
RL
MAGLADRY RD
70-020
LONE TREE RD
SOUTH END
33
2639
RL
MANSFIELD RD
75-010
FAIRVIEW RD
END
22
2662
RL
MCCLOSKEY RD
71-010
1000' E/O SAN FELIPE RD
1 MILE FROM START
26
5280
RMaC
MCCLOSKEY RD
71-020
1 MILE FROM START
FAIRVIEW RD
33
4525
RMaC
MCCONNELL RD
45-010
HWY 25
HWY 156
3
300
RL
MCMAHON RD
64-010
FALLON RD
END
30
4315
RL
MERIDIAN ST
53A-010
END
FAIRVIEW RD
70
1500
RL
MERRILL RD
6-010
SEARLE RD
BROWN RD
40
4475
RL
MERRILL RD
6-020
BROWN RD
HWY 156
41
4000
RL
MILLER RD
35-010
BUENA VISTA RD
WEST SIDE RD
11
1188
RMiC
MISSION VINEYARD RD
28-010
THE ALAMEDA
SAN JUAN HOLLISTER
38
5650
RMiC
MITCHELL RD
33-010
HWY 156
FREITAS RD
45
2556
RMaC
MITCHELL RD
33-020
FREITAS RD
END
47
740
RL
MONTEREY ST
29-010
HWY 156
CL @ MUCKLEMI ST
74
212
RMiA
DOOLING RD
END
16
2400
RL
SHWY 25
1 MI E/O HWY 25
27
5280
RL
MORADA LN
68B-010
MURPHY RD
93-010
10
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
13
3580
RL
MURPHY RD
93-020
1 MI E/O HWY 25
WEST END
NASH RD
82-010
RIVERSIDE RD
PCC BRIDGE
2150
RMiC
NASH RD
82-020
S/PCC BRIDGE
N/PCC BRIDGE
310
RMiC
NASH RD
82-030
PCC BRIDGE
CITY LIMIT
380
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-010
PANOCHE RD
1 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
23
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-020
1 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
2 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
20
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-030
2 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
3 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
25
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-040
3 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
4 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
15
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-050
4 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
5 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
25
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-060
5 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
6 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
14
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-070
6 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
7 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
17
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-080
7 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
8 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
14
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-090
8 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
9 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
15
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-100
9 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
10 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
16
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-110
10 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
11 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
14
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-120
11 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
12 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
14
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-130
12 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
13 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
12
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-140
13 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
14 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
8
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-150
14 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
15 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
45
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-160
15 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
16 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
68
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-170
16 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
17 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
11
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-180
17 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
18 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
18
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-190
18 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
19 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
17
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-200
19 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
20 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
20
5280
RMiC
11
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
NEW IDRIA RD
107-210
20 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
END AT CATTLE GUARD
23
2950
RMiC
NORTH CHAPPELL RD - (1/2 CITY)
72-040
0.04M E/KIRKPATRICK DR
END
13
725
RMiC
NORTH FORK RD
67-010
END OF PAVEMENT
W/S BRIDGE (MON CO LN)
21
5500
RL
NORTH FORK RD
67-020
W/S BRIDGE (MON CO LN)
1 MI E/O BRIDGE
20
5280
RL
NORTH FORK RD
67-030
1 MI E/O BRIDGE
HWY 198
14
4715
RL
OLD AIRLINE HWY
150-010
CIENEGA RD
1 MI S/O CIENEGA RD
22
5280
RMiC
OLD AIRLINE HWY
150-020
1 MI S/O CIENEGA RD
2 MI S/O CIENEGA RD
24
5280
RMiC
OLD AIRLINE HWY
150-030
2 MI S/O CIENEGA RD
SHWY 25
24
1368
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-010
WILLOW CREEK RD
1 MI E/O WILL CREEK RD
26
5280
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-020
1 MI E/O WILLOW CREEK RD
2 MI E/O WILLOW CREEK RD
25
5280
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-030
2 MI E/O WILLOW CREEK RD
3 MI E/O WILLOW CREEK RD
31
5280
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-040
3 MI E/O WILLOW CREEK RD
END OF PAVEMENT
24
2080
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-210
START OF PAVEMENT
1 MI S/ PAVEMENT
24
5070
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-220
1 MI S/ PAVEMENT
2 MI S/ PAVEMENT
21
5280
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-230
2 MI S/ PAVEMENT
3 MI S/ PAVEMENT
23
5280
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-240
3 MI S/ PAVEMENT
4 MI S/ PAVEMENT
30
5280
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-250
4 MI S/ PAVEMENT
COALINGA RD
24
5425
RMiC
OLYMPIA RD
27-010
LUCY BROWN LN
BIXBY RD
52
5280
RMiC
ORCHARD RD
54-010
FAIRVIEW RD
1 MI N/ FAIRVIEW RD
53
5280
RMiC
ORCHARD RD
54-020
1 MI N/ FAIRVIEW RD
FOOTHILL RD
32
3450
RMiC
ORCHARD RD
54-030
FOOTHILL RD
PRIVATE ROAD
12
3117
RMiC
PACHECO HWY
159-010
PAVEMENT END NORTH
FAIRVIEW RD
27
3739
RL
PACHECO HWY
159-020
FAIRVIEW RD
1 MI S FAIRVIEW RD
36
5280
RL
PACHECO HWY
159-030
1 MI S FAIRVIEW RD
ROAD Q
33
1670
RL
12
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
PAJARO RD
142-010
HWY 129
END
52
415
RL
PAN TEMPO WAY
69A-010
LONE TREE RD
SOUTH END
17
2308
RL
PANOCHE RD
98-010
SHWY RTE 25
1 MI E/SHWY 25
28
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-020
1 MI E/SHWY 25
2 MI E/SHWY 25
27
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-030
2 MI E/SHWY 25
3 MI E/SHWY 25
31
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-040
3 MI E/SHWY 25
4 MI E/SHWY 25
41
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-050
4 MI E/SHWY 25
5 MI E/SHWY 25
28
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-060
5 MI E/SHWY 25
6 MI E/SHWY 25
33
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-070
6 MI E/SHWY 25
7 MI E/SHWY 25
38
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-080
7 MI E/SHWY 25
8 MI E/SHWY 25
37
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-090
8 MI E/SHWY 25
9 MI E/SHWY 25
29
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-100
9 MI E/SHWY 25
10 MI E/SHWY 25
36
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-110
10 MI E/SHWY 25
11 MI E/SHWY 25
51
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-120
11 MI E/SHWY 25
12 MI E/SHWY 25
59
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-130
12 MI E/SHWY 25
13 MI E/SHWY 25
60
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-140
13 MI E/SHWY 25
14 MI E/SHWY 25
26
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-150
14 MI E/SHWY 25
15 MI E/SHWY 25
32
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-160
15 MI E/SHWY 25
16 MI E/SHWY 25
23
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-170
16 MI E/SHWY 25
17 MI E/SHWY 25
18
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-180
17 MI E/SHWY 25
18 MI E/SHWY 25
20
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-190
18 MI E/SHWY 25
19 MI E/SHWY 25
17
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-200
19 MI E/SHWY 25
20 MI E/SHWY 25
23
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-210
20 MI E/SHWY 25
21 MI E/SHWY 25
32
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-220
21 MI E/SHWY 25
22 MI E/SHWY 25
28
5280
RMaC
13
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
PANOCHE RD
98-230
22 MI E/SHWY 25
23 MI E/SHWY 25
23
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-240
23 MI E/SHWY 25
24 MI E/SHWY 25
24
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-250
24 MI E/SHWY 25
25 MI E/SHWY 25
20
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-260
25 MI E/SHWY 25
26 MI E/SHWY 25
19
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-270
26 MI E/SHWY 25
27 MI E/SHWY 25
19
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-280
27 MI E/SHWY 25
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
19
4850
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-290
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
NORTON RD
21
5240
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-300
NORTON RD
1 MI E/ NORTON RD
13
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-310
1 MI E/ NORTON RD
NEW IDRIA RD
22
5496
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-320
NEW IDRIA RD
1 MI E/ NEW IDRIA RD
35
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-330
1 MI E/ NEW IDRIA RD
2 MI E/ NEW IDRIA RD
19
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-340
2 MI E/ NEW IDRIA RD
END OF PAVEMENT
31
3425
RMaC
PAYNE RD
21-010
SCHOOL RD
END
27
1700
RL
PINE TREE AVE
117-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
END
27
550
RL
PRESCOTT RD
24-010
SAN JUAN HWY
SAN JUSTO RD
54
2545
RMiC
QUARRY RD
17-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
END CO ROAD
43
3375
RMaC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-010
BOLADO RD
SHWY 25
34
1405
RMiC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-020
SHWY 25
1 MI E/ HWY 25
33
5280
RMiC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-030
1 MI E/ HWY 25
2 MI E/ HWY 25
29
5280
RMiC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-040
2 MI E/ HWY 25
3 MI E/ HWY 25
20
5280
RMiC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-050
3 MI E/ HWY 25
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
19
2164
RMiC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-060
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
1 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
24
5280
RMiC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-070
1 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
2 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
36
5280
RMiC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-080
2 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
3 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
29
5280
RMiC
14
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
QUIEN SABE RD
92-090
3 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
4 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
21
5280
RMiC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-100
4 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
5 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
23
5280
RMiC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-110
5 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
QUIEN SABE RANCH RD
28
1200
RMiC
QUIEN SABE RD
92L-010
FIRST STREET
HWY 25
45
383
RL
RIVEROAKS RD
158-010
HWY 129
HWY 129
35
597
RL
RIVERSIDE RD
81-010
NORTH END
NASH ROAD
35
3140
RMiC
RIVERSIDE RD
81-020
NASH ROAD
UNION RD
26
3375
RMiC
ROCKS ROAD
9-010
HWY 101
LITTLE MERRILL RD
36
4400
RMiC
ROCKS ROAD
9-020
LITTLE MERRILL RD
1 MI E/ LITTLE MERRILL RD
36
5280
RMiC
ROCKS ROAD
9-030
1 MI E/ LITTLE MERRILL RD
END OF PAVEMENT
44
2340
RMiC
ROSA MORADA RD
68-010
FAIRVIEW RD
DOOLING RD
21
2655
RMiC
ROSA MORADA RD
68-020
DOOLING RD
END
28
2700
RMiC
ROSE AVE
15-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
END
34
950
RL
SALINAS RD
3-010
CL @ SAN JUAN-HOLLISTER RD
MISSION VINEYARD
26
1225
RMaC
SALINAS RD
3-020
SAN JUAN CYN RD
1 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
38
5280
RMaC
SALINAS RD
3-030
1 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
2 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
22
5280
RMaC
SALINAS RD
3-040
2 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
3 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
22
5280
RMaC
SALINAS RD
3-050
3 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
4 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
28
5280
RMaC
SALINAS RD
3-060
4 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
MON CO LN
18
1162
RMaC
SAN BENITO LATERAL
111-010
SHWY 25
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
29
3428
RL
SAN BENITO ST.
122-010
CL S/ NASH
SOUTHSIDE RD
43
3575
RPA
SAN BENITO ST.
122-020
SOUTHSIDE RD
UNION RD
51
775
RPA
SAN FELIPE RD (NB)
52N-010
0.9 N/FALLON RD
HWY 156
62
3170
RPA
SAN FELIPE RD (NB)
52N-020
HWY 156
1 MI N/ HWY 156
62
5280
RMaC
15
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
SAN FELIPE RD (NB)
52N-030
1 MI N/ HWY 156
2 MI N/ HWY 156
59
5280
RMaC
SAN FELIPE RD (NB)
52N-040
2 MI N/ HWY 156
FAIRVIEW RD
43
1575
RMaC
SAN FELIPE RD (NB)
52N-050
FAIRVIEW RD
1 MI N/ FAIRVIEW RD
38
5280
RMaC
SAN FELIPE RD (NB)
52N-060
1 MI N/ FAIRVIEW RD
SANTA CLARA CO LINE
37
1910
RMaC
SAN FELIPE RD (SB)
52S-010
HWY 156
3160' S/ HWY 156
54
3160
RPA
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-010
SALINAS RD
END PCC
50
1800
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-020
END PCC
1 MI S/O PCC
23
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-030
1 MI S/O PCC
2 MI S/O PCC
25
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-040
2 MI S/O PCC
3 MI S/O PCC
30
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-050
3 MI S/O PCC
4 MI S/O PCC
25
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-060
4 MI S/O PCC
5 MI S/O PCC
28
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-070
5 MI S/O PCC
6 MI S/O PCC
38
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-080
6 MI S/O PCC
7 MI S/O PCC
27
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-090
7 MI S/O PCC
8 MI S/O PCC
40
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-100
8 MI S/O PCC
9 MI S/O PCC
38
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-110
9 MI S PCC
STATE PARK GATE
40
3245
RMaC
SAN JUAN HWY
4-010
CL 0.3M S/PRESCOTT R
1 MI N/ CL
59
5280
RPA
SAN JUAN HWY
4-020
1 MI N/ CL
ANZAR RD
63
4250
RPA
SAN JUAN HWY
4-030
ANZAR RD
HWY 101
55
4175
RPA
SAN JUSTO RD
23-010
SAN JUAN HWY
1 MI S/ SAN JUAN HWY
59
5280
RMaC
SAN JUSTO RD
23-020
1 MI S/ SAN JUAN HWY
PRESCOTT RD
62
1870
RMaC
SAN JUSTO RD
23-030
PRESCOTT RD
1 MI S/ PRESCOTT RD
49
5280
RMaC
SAN JUSTO RD
23-040
1 MI S/ PRESCOTT RD
LUCY BROWN LN
25
4190
RMaC
SANTA ANA RD
73-010
CL E/ SCHOOL
W/C W/ CAREY WAY
32
4530
RMaC
16
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
SANTA ANA RD
73-020
W/C W/ CAREY WAY
FAIRVIEW RD
39
1458
RMaC
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
130-010
FAIRVIEW RD
RODEO DR
27
5375
RMiC
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
130-020
RODEO DR
1 MI S/ RODEO DR
18
5280
RMiC
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
130-030
1 MI S/ RODEO DR
2 MI S/ RODEO DR
18
5280
RMiC
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
130-040
2 MI S/ RODEO DR
3 MI S/ RODEO DR
22
5280
RMiC
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
130-050
3 MI S/ RODEO DR
4 MI S/ RODEO DR
21
5280
RMiC
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
130-060
4 MI S/ RODEO DR
JOHN SMITH RD
20
3550
RMiC
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
130-070
JOHN SMITH RD
1 MI S/ JOHN SMITH RD
26
5280
RMiC
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
130-080
1 MI S/ JOHN SMITH RD
QUIEN SABE RD
19
4100
RMiC
SANTA ANITA RD
74-010
QUIEN SABE RD
1 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
23
5280
RL
SANTA ANITA RD
74-020
1 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
2 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
29
5280
RL
SANTA ANITA RD
74-030
2 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
3 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
24
5280
RL
SANTA ANITA RD
74-040
3 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
4 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
25
5280
RL
SANTA ANITA RD
74-050
4 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
5 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
30
5280
RL
SANTA ANITA RD
74-060
5 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
6 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
34
5280
RL
SANTA ROSA DR
157-010
FALLON RD
END
84
825
RL
SCAGLIOTTI RD
61-010
END
FALLON RD
10
4930
RL
SCHOOL RD
20-010
HWY 129
FOREST RD
34
4305
RL
SCHOOL RD
20-020
FOREST RD
1 MI S/ FOREST RD
19
5280
RL
SCHOOL RD
20-030
1 MI S/ FOREST RD
2 MI S/ FOREST RD
35
5280
RL
SCHOOL RD
20-040
2 MI S/ FOREST RD
ANZAR RD
36
2760
RL
SEARLE RD
154-010
HWY 129
ANZAR RD
11
3830
RMiC
SEARLE RD
154-020
ANZAR RD
1 MI S/ ANZAR RD
42
5280
RMiC
SEARLE RD
154-030
1 MI S/ ANZAR RD
HWY 156
53
1000
RMiC
17
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
SEELY AVE
13-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
END
34
3625
RL
SHORE RD
49-010
HWY 25
1 MI E/ HWY 25
59
5280
RMiA
SHORE RD
49-020
1 MI E/ HWY 25
2 MI E/ HWY 25
46
5280
RMiA
SHORE RD
49-030
2 MI E/ HWY 25
3 MI E/ HWY 25
34
5280
RMiA
SHORE RD
49-040
3 MI E/ HWY 25
SAN FELIPE RD
53
4250
RMiA
SJ/HOLL (JUNKYD - PONDS)
151-010
FOURTH ST W
FOURTH ST E
38
3460
RL
SJ/HOLL (SJ CYN RD - 156)
151C-010 THE ALAMEDA
MISSION VINEYARD
26
3975
RL
SJ/HOLL (UNION-4TH ST.)
151B-010 UNION RD
HWY 156
44
5590
RL
SNYDER AVE
12-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
END
35
3596
RL
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-010
CAROUSEL DR
UNION RD
63
1150
RMiA
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-020
UNION RD
ENTERPRISE RD
50
1180
RMiA
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-030
ENTERPRISE RD
CO LABOR CAMP RD
44
2350
RMiA
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-040
CO LABOR CAMP RD
BLOSSOM LN NORTH
66
3625
RMiA
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-050
BLOSSOM LN NORTH
BLOSSOM RD SOUTH
71
5540
RMiA
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-060
BLOSSOM RD SOUTH
1 MI S/ BLOSSOM RD SOUTH
77
5280
RMiA
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-070
1 MI S/ BLOSSOM RD SOUTH
W/S PCC BRIDGE
84
2425
RMiA
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-080
W/S PCC BRIDGE
E/S PCC BRIDGE
89
350
RMiA
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-090
E/S PCC BRIDGE
1 MI E/ PCC BRIDGE
37
5280
RMiA
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-100
1 MI E/ PCC BRIDGE
W/S PCC BRIDGE
27
3640
RMiA
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-110
W/S PCC BRIDGE
E/S PCC BRIDGE
77
620
RMiA
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-120
E/S PCC BRIDGE
SHWY 25
56
1775
RMiA
SPRING GROVE RD
63-010
FAIRVIEW RD
FALLON RD
44
3850
RL
SPRING GROVE RD
63-020
FALLON RD
BENITO RD
28
4115
RL
SPRING GROVE RD
63-030
BENITO RD
END
19
1775
RL
18
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name SUNNYSLOPE RD THIRD STREET - TP
Section ID 77-010
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
FAIRVIEW RD
79
1701
RPA
END
22
390
RL
From
To
CITY LIMIT
129 E-010 F STREET
THOMAS RD
88-010
SOUTHSIDE RD
1 MI S/ SOUTHSIDE RD
22
5280
RL
THOMAS RD
88-020
1 MI S/ SOUTHSIDE RD
2 MI S/ SOUTHSIDE RD
26
5280
RL
THOMAS RD
88-030
2 MI S/ SOUTHSIDE RD
SOUTHSIDE RD
24
3850
RL
UNION RD
80-010
SHWY 156
1 MI S/ SHWY 156
37
5280
RPA
UNION RD
80-020
1 MI S/ SHWY 156
UNION HEIGHTS
42
5030
RPA
UNION RD
80-030
UNION HEIGHTS
1 MI S/ UNION HEIGHTS
47
5280
RPA
UNION RD
80-040
1 MI S/ UNION HEIGHTS
W/S PCC BRIDGE
48
3700
RPA
UNION RD
80-050
W/S PCC BRIDGE
E/S PCC BRIDGE
81
630
RPA
UNION RD
80-060
E/S PCC BRIDGE
SOUTHSIDE RD
59
3915
RPA
UNION RD
80-070
SOUTHSIDE RD
SHWY 25
51
1625
RPA
VALLEY VIEW RD
96-010
CL 530' S/ CRESCENT LN
CRESTVIEW LN
9
856
RMiC
WESTSIDE RD
66-010
MILLER RD
BUENA VISTA RD
46
2970
RL
WILLOW CREEK RD
112-010
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
1 MI N OLD HERNANDEZ RD
26
5280
RL
WILLOW CREEK RD
112-020
1 MI N OLD HERNANDEZ RD
2 MI N OLD HERNANDEZ RD
22
5280
RL
WILLOW CREEK RD
112-030
2 MI N OLD HERNANDEZ RD
3 MI N OLD HERNANDEZ RD
28
5280
RL
WILLOW CREEK RD
112-040
3 MI N OLD HERNANDEZ RD
END CO RD
30
2625
RL
WILLOW GROVE SCHOOL RD
94-010
SHWY 25
END
25
724
RL
WRIGHT RD
37-010
BUENA VISTA RD
1 MI E/ BUENA VISTA
39
5280
RMaC
WRIGHT RD
37-020
1 MI E/ BUENA VISTA
2 MI E/ BUENA VISTA
49
5280
RMaC
WRIGHT RD
37-030
2 MI E/ BUENA VISTA
HWY 25
34
1515
RMaC
Y ROAD
40-010
SOUTH END
END PCC
53
1250
RMiA
Y ROAD
40-020
END PCC / START AC
5560 N/O PCC (STOP SIGN)
39
5560
RMiA
19
San Benito County Street List Alphabetical Street Name Y ROAD
Section ID 40-030
From
To
STOP SIGN
GATE
20
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
41
995
RMiA
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
CIENEGA RD
83-020
COP 1475' S/O UNION RD
CIENEGA RD EXTENSION
95
550
RMaC
CIENEGA RD EXTENSION
83-300
0.4M S/ UNION ROAD
HOSPITAL RD
92
3115
RMaC
JOHN SMITH RD
78-020
COP
BEST RD
89
5230
RMaC
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-080
W/S PCC BRIDGE
E/S PCC BRIDGE
89
350
RMiA
JOHN SMITH RD
78-030
BEST RD
COP E/O LANDFILL ENTRANCE
87
4240
RMaC
COLE RD
11-030
RICARDO DR
SAN JUAN RD
85
3750
RMiC
HILLCREST RD
76-010
CL .04 E/BUSBY CT
CL 0.3M W/FAIRVIEW RD
84
3532
RPA
SANTA ROSA DR
157-010
FALLON RD
END
84
825
RL
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-070
1 MI S/ BLOSSOM RD SOUTH
W/S PCC BRIDGE
84
2425
RMiA
UNION RD
80-050
W/S PCC BRIDGE
E/S PCC BRIDGE
81
630
RPA
SUNNYSLOPE RD
77-010
CITY LIMIT
FAIRVIEW RD
79
1701
RPA
COTTONWOOD RD
100-020
1 MI E/O PANOCHE RD
2 MI E/O PANOCHE RD
78
5280
RL
CRESTVIEW LN
146-010
VALLEY VIEW RD
END
78
1056
RL
HOSPITAL RD
84-020
WEST END
SOUTHSIDE RD
78
1445
RMiC
LADD LANE
136-010
SOUTHSIDE RD
SOUTH END
78
680
RL
BUENA VISTA RD (1/2 CITY)
34-030
4535' E/O HWY 156
MILLER RD
77
3565
RMaC
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-060
BLOSSOM RD SOUTH
1 MI S/ BLOSSOM RD SOUTH
77
5280
RMiA
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-110
W/S PCC BRIDGE
E/S PCC BRIDGE
77
620
RMiA
MONTEREY ST
29-010
HWY 156
CL @ MUCKLEMI ST
74
212
RMiA
EL CAMINO PARAISO
156-010
HILLCREST RD
END
71
1300
RL
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-050
BLOSSOM LN NORTH
BLOSSOM RD SOUTH
71
5540
RMiA
MERIDIAN ST
53A-010
END
FAIRVIEW RD
70
1500
RL
NEW IDRIA RD
107-160
15 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
16 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
68
5280
RMiC
CHAPPELL RD
72-010
75' N/O MAPLE ST
PRIMAVERA DR
66
590
RMiC
FAIRVIEW RD
53-010
SAN FELIPE RD
LUDIS LN
66
5190
RPA
1
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-040
CO LABOR CAMP RD
BLOSSOM LN NORTH
66
3625
RMiA
CHAPPELL RD - (1/2 CITY)
72-020
PRIMAVERA DR
PACIFIC WAY
65
910
RMiC
MAGLADRY RD
70-010
RODRIQUEZ CT
LONE TREE RD
63
3650
RL
SAN JUAN HWY
4-020
1 MI N/ CL
ANZAR RD
63
4250
RPA
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-010
CAROUSEL DR
UNION RD
63
1150
RMiA
SAN FELIPE RD (NB)
52N-010
0.9 N/FALLON RD
HWY 156
62
3170
RPA
SAN FELIPE RD (NB)
52N-020
HWY 156
1 MI N/ HWY 156
62
5280
RMaC
SAN JUSTO RD
23-020
1 MI S/ SAN JUAN HWY
PRESCOTT RD
62
1870
RMaC
FRAZIER LAKE RD
47-020
1 MI N/O SHORE RD
2 MI N/O SHORE RD
61
5280
RMaC
SUNNYSLOPE RD
SOUTH END
60
270
RL
BEVERLY DR
77B-010
CIENEGA RD
83-050
HOSPITAL RD
HIDDEN VALLEY RD
60
3915
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-130
12 MI E/SHWY 25
13 MI E/SHWY 25
60
5280
RMaC
FRAZIER LAKE RD
47-030
2 MI N/O SHORE RD
3 MI N/O SHORE RD
59
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-120
11 MI E/SHWY 25
12 MI E/SHWY 25
59
5280
RMaC
52N-030
1 MI N/ HWY 156
2 MI N/ HWY 156
59
5280
RMaC
SAN FELIPE RD (NB) SAN JUAN HWY
4-010
CL 0.3M S/PRESCOTT R
1 MI N/ CL
59
5280
RPA
SAN JUSTO RD
23-010
SAN JUAN HWY
1 MI S/ SAN JUAN HWY
59
5280
RMaC
SHORE RD
49-010
HWY 25
1 MI E/ HWY 25
59
5280
RMiA
UNION RD
80-060
E/S PCC BRIDGE
SOUTHSIDE RD
59
3915
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-150
OLD RANCH RD
HWY 25
58
2539
RPA
FRAZIER LAKE RD
47-040
3 MI N/O SHORE RD
SCL CO LN
56
2102
RMaC
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-120
E/S PCC BRIDGE
SHWY 25
56
1775
RMiA
FOREST RD
19-010
ANZAR RD
SCHOOL RD
55
2400
RMiC
SAN JUAN HWY
4-030
ANZAR RD
HWY 101
55
4175
RPA
HWY 101
SOUTH END
54
4055
RL
BETABEL RD
163-020
2
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
CIENEGA RD
83-170
E/S PCC BRIDGE
THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
54
4850
RMaC
COMSTOCK RD
59-020
ASUYMAS CT
CANYON DR
54
4300
RMiC
FAIRVIEW RD
53-120
HILLCREST RD
SUNNYSLOPE RD
54
2668
RPA
GARDENIA LN
73B-010
SANTA ANA RD
SOUTH END
54
740
RL
PRESCOTT RD
24-010
SAN JUAN HWY
SAN JUSTO RD
54
2545
RMiC
HWY 156
3160' S/ HWY 156
54
3160
RPA
SAN FELIPE RD (SB)
52S-010
ORCHARD RD
54-010
FAIRVIEW RD
1 MI N/ FAIRVIEW RD
53
5280
RMiC
SEARLE RD
154-030
1 MI S/ ANZAR RD
HWY 156
53
1000
RMiC
SHORE RD
49-040
3 MI E/ HWY 25
SAN FELIPE RD
53
4250
RMiA
Y ROAD
40-010
SOUTH END
END PCC
53
1250
RMiA
BIXBY RD
30-020
FREITAS RD
DUNCAN AVE
52
2700
RMaC
DUNCAN AVE
26-010
LUCY BROWN LN
BIXBY RD
52
5280
RMiC
FALLON RD
60-020
SCAGLIOTTI RD
GRANT RD
52
3613
RMaC
FLYNN RD
44-010
HWY 25
COUNTY LINE
52
830
RMiC
OLYMPIA RD
27-010
LUCY BROWN LN
BIXBY RD
52
5280
RMiC
PAJARO RD
142-010
HWY 129
END
52
415
RL
BROWN RD
7-010
CANNON RD
MERRIL RD
51
4250
RL
COLE RD
11-010
ANZAR RD
1 MI S/O ANZAR RD
51
5280
RMiC
PANOCHE RD
98-110
10 MI E/SHWY 25
11 MI E/SHWY 25
51
5280
RMaC
SAN BENITO ST.
122-020
SOUTHSIDE RD
UNION RD
51
775
RPA
UNION RD
80-070
SOUTHSIDE RD
SHWY 25
51
1625
RPA
CIENEGA RD
83-010
UNION RD
COP 1475' S/O UNION RD
50
1460
RMaC
COUNTY LABOR CAMP RD
41-010
SOUTHSIDE RD
650' S/O SOUTHSIDE RD
50
650
RL
FAIRVIEW RD
53-020
LUDIS LN
HWY 156
50
1960
RPA
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-010
SALINAS RD
END PCC
50
1800
RMaC
3
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-020
UNION RD
ENTERPRISE RD
50
1180
RMiA
CIENEGA RD
83-090
3 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
4 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
49
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-110
5 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
6 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
49
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-140
8 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
9 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
49
5280
RMaC
FREITAS RD
31-010
BIXBY RD
FLINT RD
49
5280
RMaC
LUCY BROWN LN
25-020
OLYMPIA AVE
SAN JUSTO RD
49
1725
RMaC
SAN JUSTO RD
23-030
PRESCOTT RD
1 MI S/ PRESCOTT RD
49
5280
RMaC
WRIGHT RD
37-020
1 MI E/ BUENA VISTA
2 MI E/ BUENA VISTA
49
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-150
9 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
10 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
48
5280
RMaC
FAIRVIEW RD
53-070
FALLON RD
ROSA MORADA RD
48
3070
RPA
JOHN SMITH RD
78-010
FAIRVIEW RD
COP
48
2450
RMaC
UNION RD
80-040
1 MI S/ UNION HEIGHTS
W/S PCC BRIDGE
48
3700
RPA
ANZAR RD
5-030
FOREST RD
CANNON RD
47
6625
RMaC
BROWNS VALLEY RD
99-010
PANOCHE RD
END OF PAVEMENT
47
500
RMiC
COWDEN RD
90-010
HOSPITAL RD
END
47
3880
RL
MITCHELL RD
33-020
FREITAS RD
END
47
740
RL
UNION RD
80-030
UNION HEIGHTS
1 MI S/ UNION HEIGHTS
47
5280
RPA
BUENA VISTA RD
34-020
HWY 156 E/S
4535 E/O HWY 156
46
4535
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-180
THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
1 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
46
5280
RMaC
COTTONWOOD RD
100-010
PANOCHE RD
1 MI E/O PANOCHE
46
5280
RL
LONE TREE RD
69-020
MAGLADRY RD
1 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
46
5280
RMiC
SHORE RD
49-020
1 MI E/ HWY 25
2 MI E/ HWY 25
46
5280
RMiA
WESTSIDE RD
66-010
MILLER RD
BUENA VISTA RD
46
2970
RL
LEWIS CREEK RD
133-050
4 MI E/O HWY 25
5 MI E/O HWY 25
45
5280
RL
MITCHELL RD
33-010
HWY 156
FREITAS RD
45
2556
RMaC
4
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
NEW IDRIA RD
107-150
14 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
15 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
45
5280
RMiC
QUIEN SABE RD
92L-010
FIRST STREET
HWY 25
45
383
RL
CIENEGA RD
83-200
2 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
3 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
44
5280
RMaC
FAIRVIEW RD
53-040
LOS VIBORAS
ACQUISTAPACE RD
44
2510
RPA
LEWIS CREEK RD
133-010
SHWY 25
1 MI E/O HWY 25
44
5280
RL
1 MI E/ LITTLE MERRILL RD
END OF PAVEMENT
44
2340
RMiC
HWY 156
44
5590
RL
ROCKS ROAD SJ/HOLL (UNION-4TH ST.)
9-030
151B-010 UNION RD
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-030
ENTERPRISE RD
CO LABOR CAMP RD
44
2350
RMiA
SPRING GROVE RD
63-010
FAIRVIEW RD
FALLON RD
44
3850
RL
FALLON RD
60-030
GRANT RD
FAIRVIEW RD
43
3255
RMaC
JOHN SMITH RD
78-060
2 MI E/LANDFILL ENT.
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
43
3620
RMaC
QUARRY RD
17-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
END CO ROAD
43
3375
RMaC
SAN BENITO ST.
122-010
CL S/ NASH
SOUTHSIDE RD
43
3575
RPA
SAN FELIPE RD (NB)
52N-040
2 MI N/ HWY 156
FAIRVIEW RD
43
1575
RMaC
CANNON RD
8-010
HWY 101
CHATEAU DR
42
2500
RMiC
CIENEGA RD
83-070
1 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
2 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
42
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-160
10 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
E/S PCC BRIDGE
42
4015
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-400
NEVADA ST
PROMISE WAY
42
1350
RMaC
SEARLE RD
154-020
ANZAR RD
1 MI S/ ANZAR RD
42
5280
RMiC
UNION RD
80-020
1 MI S/ SHWY 156
UNION HEIGHTS
42
5030
RPA
FRAZIER LAKE RD
47-010
SHORE RD
1 MI N/O SHORE RD
41
5280
RMaC
KING CITY RD
113-060
5 MI E MO CO LN
HWY 25
41
3240
RMiA
MERRILL RD
6-020
BROWN RD
HWY 156
41
4000
RL
PANOCHE RD
98-040
3 MI E/SHWY 25
4 MI E/SHWY 25
41
5280
RMaC
Y ROAD
40-030
STOP SIGN
GATE
41
995
RMiA
5
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
ANZAR RD
5-010
CARR AVE
COLE RD
40
1960
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-040
MONTE BELLO CT
HOSPITAL RD
40
2900
RMaC
COALINGA RD
109-040
3 MILE
4 MILE
40
5280
RMiC
SHWY 25
40
375
RL
FIRST STREET - TP
129G-010 END
FLINT RD
32-010
HWY 156
FREITAS RD
40
2675
RL
KING CITY RD
113-050
4 MI E MO CO LN
5 MI E MO CO LN
40
5280
RMiA
MERRILL RD
6-010
SEARLE RD
BROWN RD
40
4475
RL
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-090
7 MI S/O PCC
8 MI S/O PCC
40
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-110
9 MI S PCC
STATE PARK GATE
40
3245
RMaC
ANZAR RD
5-020
COLE AVE
FOREST RD
39
3550
RMaC
AROMITAS RD
18-010
QUARRY RD
COP
39
3115
RMiC
BETABEL RD
163-010
NORTH END
HWY 101
39
4940
RL
BOLADO RD
91-020
QUIEN SABE RD
SHWY 25
39
2500
RMiC
CARR AVE
14-020
ARRIBA DR
ANZAR RD
39
4325
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-130
7 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
8 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
39
5280
RMaC
FAIRVIEW RD
53-060
SPRING GROVE RD
FALLON RD
39
3545
RPA
D STREET - TP
39
450
RL
FIFTH STREET - TP
129C-010 SHWY 25
HILLSIDE RD
140-010
SAN JUAN CYN RD NORTH
SAN JUAN CYN RD SOUTH
39
4340
RL
SANTA ANA RD
73-020
W/C W/ CAREY WAY
FAIRVIEW RD
39
1458
RMaC
WRIGHT RD
37-010
BUENA VISTA RD
1 MI E/ BUENA VISTA
39
5280
RMaC
Y ROAD
40-020
END PCC / START AC
5560 N/O PCC (STOP SIGN)
39
5560
RMiA
CIENEGA RD
83-080
2 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
3 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
38
5280
RMaC
EL TORO DR
42-010
CL N / HILLCREST
N / POPPYLANE
38
1759
RL
FAIRVIEW RD
53-030
HWY 156
LOS VIBORAS
38
4098
RPA
MISSION VINEYARD RD
28-010
THE ALAMEDA
SAN JUAN HOLLISTER
38
5650
RMiC
6
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
PANOCHE RD
98-070
6 MI E/SHWY 25
7 MI E/SHWY 25
38
5280
RMaC
SALINAS RD
3-020
SAN JUAN CYN RD
1 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
38
5280
RMaC
52N-050
FAIRVIEW RD
1 MI N/ FAIRVIEW RD
38
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-070
5 MI S/O PCC
6 MI S/O PCC
38
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-100
8 MI S/O PCC
9 MI S/O PCC
38
5280
RMaC
151-010
FOURTH ST W
FOURTH ST E
38
3460
RL
CANNON RD
8-020
CHATEAU DR
BROWN ROAD
37
3325
RMiC
CIENEGA RD
83-030
CIENEGA RD EXTENSION
MONTE BELLO CT
37
2525
RMaC
FALLON RD
60-050
CARPENTER DR
SPRING GROVE RD
37
2900
RMiC
KING CITY RD
113-030
2 MI E MO CO LN
3 MI E MO CO LN
37
5280
RMiA
KT ROAD
139-010
THOMAS RD
SOUTH END
37
2900
RL
LEWIS CREEK RD
133-040
3 MI E/O HWY 25
4 MI E/O HWY 25
37
5280
RL
LUCY BROWN LN
25-010
HWY 156
OLYMPIA AVE
37
3905
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-080
7 MI E/SHWY 25
8 MI E/SHWY 25
37
5280
RMaC
1 MI N/ FAIRVIEW RD
SANTA CLARA CO LINE
37
1910
RMaC
SAN FELIPE RD (NB)
SJ/HOLL (JUNKYD - PONDS)
SAN FELIPE RD (NB)
52N-060
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-090
E/S PCC BRIDGE
1 MI E/ PCC BRIDGE
37
5280
RMiA
UNION RD
80-010
SHWY 156
1 MI S/ SHWY 156
37
5280
RPA
BARNES LN
161-010
SANTA ANA RD
END
36
1299
RL
CIENEGA RD
83-210
3 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
4 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
36
5280
RMaC
FAIRVIEW RD
53-080
ROSA MORADA RD
DIXIE DR
36
5700
RPA
FALLON RD
60-010
HOLLISTER CITY LIMIT
SCAGLIOTTI RD
36
2920
RMaC
FOURTH ST
160-010
SAN JUAN HOLLISTER RD
SBT RIVER
36
4050
RPA
LEWIS CREEK RD
133-020
1 MI E/O HWY 25
2 MI E/O HWY 25
36
5280
RL
PACHECO HWY
159-020
FAIRVIEW RD
1 MI S FAIRVIEW RD
36
5280
RL
PANOCHE RD
98-100
9 MI E/SHWY 25
10 MI E/SHWY 25
36
5280
RMaC
7
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
QUIEN SABE RD
92-070
1 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
2 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
36
5280
RMiC
ROCKS ROAD
9-010
HWY 101
LITTLE MERRILL RD
36
4400
RMiC
ROCKS ROAD
9-020
LITTLE MERRILL RD
1 MI E/ LITTLE MERRILL RD
36
5280
RMiC
SCHOOL RD
20-040
2 MI S/ FOREST RD
ANZAR RD
36
2760
RL
CIENEGA RD
83-120
6 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
7 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
35
5280
RMaC
LONE TREE RD
69-010
FAIRVIEW RD
MAGLADRY RD
35
2650
RMiC
LOS VIBORAS RD
56-010
FAIRVIEW RD
JENNY LN
35
2850
RMiC
LOS VIBORAS RD
56-020
FAIRVIEW RD
END
35
2907
RMiC
LOVERS LANE RD
50-030
2 MI N/O SHORE RD
SANTA CLARA CO LINE
35
1485
RMiC
PANOCHE RD
98-320
NEW IDRIA RD
1 MI E/ NEW IDRIA RD
35
5280
RMaC
RIVEROAKS RD
158-010
HWY 129
HWY 129
35
597
RL
RIVERSIDE RD
81-010
NORTH END
NASH ROAD
35
3140
RMiC
SCHOOL RD
20-030
1 MI S/ FOREST RD
2 MI S/ FOREST RD
35
5280
RL
SNYDER AVE
12-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
END
35
3596
RL
CAGNEY RD
39-010
BREEN RD
NORTH END
34
2825
RL
FAIRVIEW RD
53-130
SUNNYSLOPE RD
JOHN SMITH RD
34
2334
RPA
LEWIS CREEK RD
133-060
5 MI E/O HWY 25
END CO RD
34
1723
RL
LIMEKILN RD
95-010
CIENEGA RD
1 MI S/ CIENEGA RD
34
5280
RL
LONE TREE RD
69-030
1 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
2 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
34
5280
RMiC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-010
BOLADO RD
SHWY 25
34
1405
RMiC
ROSE AVE
15-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
END
34
950
RL
SANTA ANITA RD
74-060
5 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
6 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
34
5280
RL
SCHOOL RD
20-010
HWY 129
FOREST RD
34
4305
RL
SEELY AVE
13-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
END
34
3625
RL
SHORE RD
49-030
2 MI E/ HWY 25
3 MI E/ HWY 25
34
5280
RMiA
8
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
WRIGHT RD
37-030
2 MI E/ BUENA VISTA
HWY 25
34
1515
RMaC
ANZAR RD
5-050
SERLE RD
SAN JUAN HWY
33
4890
RMaC
FAIRVIEW RD
53-090
DIXIE DR
MCCLOSKY RD
33
3450
RPA
FLINT RD
32-020
FREITAS RD
NORTH END
33
1338
RL
FREITAS RD
31-020
FLINT RD
MITCHELL RD
33
4700
RMaC
GARDEN AVE
16-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
END
33
480
RL
LOVERS LANE RD
50-020
1 MI N/O SHORE RD
2 MI N/O SHORE RD
33
5280
RMiC
MAGLADRY RD
70-020
LONE TREE RD
SOUTH END
33
2639
RL
MCCLOSKEY RD
71-020
1 MILE FROM START
FAIRVIEW RD
33
4525
RMaC
PACHECO HWY
159-030
1 MI S FAIRVIEW RD
ROAD Q
33
1670
RL
PANOCHE RD
98-060
5 MI E/SHWY 25
6 MI E/SHWY 25
33
5280
RMaC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-020
SHWY 25
1 MI E/ HWY 25
33
5280
RMiC
CIENEGA RD
83-100
4 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
5 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
32
5280
RMaC
CIENEGA RD
83-190
1 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
2 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
32
5280
RMaC
COLE RD
11-020
1 MI S/O ANZAR RD
RICARDO DR
32
5600
RMiC
COMSTOCK RD
59-010
FAIRVIEW RD
ASUYMAS CT
32
3875
RMiC
SHWY 25
32
360
RL
FOURTH STREET
129B-010 D STREET - TP
ORCHARD RD
54-020
1 MI N/ FAIRVIEW RD
FOOTHILL RD
32
3450
RMiC
PANOCHE RD
98-150
14 MI E/SHWY 25
15 MI E/SHWY 25
32
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-210
20 MI E/SHWY 25
21 MI E/SHWY 25
32
5280
RMaC
SANTA ANA RD
73-010
CL E/ SCHOOL
W/C W/ CAREY WAY
32
4530
RMaC
BOLADO RD
91-010
SOUTHSIDE RD
QUIEN SABE RD
31
3045
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-160
15 MILE
16 MILE
31
5280
RMiC
ENTERPRISE RD
85-010
SOUTHSIDE RD
HWY 25
31
5245
RMiC
FALLON RD
60-040
FAIRVIEW RD
CARPENTER DR
31
4530
RMiC
9
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
HUDNER LN
46-010
HWY 25
RR TRACKS
31
4550
RL
KING CITY RD
113-010
MONTEREY CO LINE
1 MI E MO CO LN
31
5280
RMiA
LIMEKILN RD
95-020
1 MI S/ CIENEGA RD
SOUTH END
31
2400
RL
LOVERS LANE RD
50-010
SHORE RD
1 MI N/O SHORE RD
31
5280
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-030
2 MI E/O WILLOW CREEK RD
3 MI E/O WILLOW CREEK RD
31
5280
RMiC
PANOCHE RD
98-030
2 MI E/SHWY 25
3 MI E/SHWY 25
31
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-340
2 MI E/ NEW IDRIA RD
END OF PAVEMENT
31
3425
RMaC
COALINGA RD
109-100
9 MILE
10 MILE
30
5280
RMiC
MCMAHON RD
64-010
FALLON RD
END
30
4315
RL
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-240
3 MI S/ PAVEMENT
4 MI S/ PAVEMENT
30
5280
RMiC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-040
2 MI S/O PCC
3 MI S/O PCC
30
5280
RMaC
SANTA ANITA RD
74-050
4 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
5 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
30
5280
RL
WILLOW CREEK RD
112-040
3 MI N OLD HERNANDEZ RD
END CO RD
30
2625
RL
KING CITY RD
113-020
1 MI E MO CO LN
2 MI E MO CO LN
29
5280
RMiA
KING CITY RD
113-040
3 MI E MO CO LN
4 MI E MO CO LN
29
5280
RMiA
LEWIS CREEK RD
133-030
2 MI E/O HWY 25
3 MI E/O HWY 25
29
5280
RL
LIVE OAK RD
137-010
HWY 25
WEST END
29
1483
RL
PANOCHE RD
98-090
8 MI E/SHWY 25
9 MI E/SHWY 25
29
5280
RMaC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-030
1 MI E/ HWY 25
2 MI E/ HWY 25
29
5280
RMiC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-080
2 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
3 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
29
5280
RMiC
SAN BENITO LATERAL
111-010
SHWY 25
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
29
3428
RL
SANTA ANITA RD
74-020
1 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
2 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
29
5280
RL
ANZAR RD
5-040
CANNON RD
SERLE RD
28
5280
RMaC
CANNON RD
8-030
BROWN RD
ANZAR RD
28
4320
RMiC
5 MILE
6 MILE
28
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-060
10
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
COALINGA RD
109-080
7 MILE
8 MILE
28
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-250
24 MILE
FRESNO COUNTY LINE
28
4870
RMiC
HOSPITAL RD
84-010
CIENEGA RD
EAST END
28
2331
RMiC
PANOCHE RD
98-010
SHWY RTE 25
1 MI E/SHWY 25
28
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-050
4 MI E/SHWY 25
5 MI E/SHWY 25
28
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-220
21 MI E/SHWY 25
22 MI E/SHWY 25
28
5280
RMaC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-110
5 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
QUIEN SABE RANCH RD
28
1200
RMiC
ROSA MORADA RD
68-020
DOOLING RD
END
28
2700
RMiC
SALINAS RD
3-050
3 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
4 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
28
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-060
4 MI S/O PCC
5 MI S/O PCC
28
5280
RMaC
SPRING GROVE RD
63-020
FALLON RD
BENITO RD
28
4115
RL
WILLOW CREEK RD
112-030
2 MI N OLD HERNANDEZ RD
3 MI N OLD HERNANDEZ RD
28
5280
RL
BONNIEVIEW RD
128-010
SUNNYSLOPE RD
END
27
1764
RL
COALINGA RD
109-030
2 MILE
3 MILE
27
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-070
6 MILE
7 MILE
27
5280
RMiC
FAIRVIEW RD
53-050
ACQUISTAPACE RD
SPRING GROVE RD
27
3507
RPA
FAIRVIEW RD
53-140
JOHN SMITH RD
OLD RANCH RD
27
3417
RPA
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-050
4 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
5 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
27
5280
RMaC
MURPHY RD
93-010
SHWY 25
1 MI E/O HWY 25
27
5280
RL
PACHECO HWY
159-010
PAVEMENT END NORTH
FAIRVIEW RD
27
3739
RL
PANOCHE RD
98-020
1 MI E/SHWY 25
2 MI E/SHWY 25
27
5280
RMaC
PAYNE RD
21-010
SCHOOL RD
END
27
1700
RL
PINE TREE AVE
117-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
END
27
550
RL
2-080
6 MI S/O PCC
7 MI S/O PCC
27
5280
RMaC
130-010
FAIRVIEW RD
RODEO DR
27
5375
RMiC
SAN JUAN CYN RD SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
11
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
SOUTHSIDE RD
86-100
1 MI E/ PCC BRIDGE
W/S PCC BRIDGE
27
3640
RMiA
COALINGA RD
109-020
1 MILE
2 MILE
26
5280
RMiC
JOHN SMITH RD
78-050
1 MI E/LANDFILL ENT.
2 MI E/LANDFILL ENT.
26
5280
RMaC
LONOAK/KING CITY RD
152-030
2 MI E/O MON CO LN
3 MI E/O MON CO LN
26
5280
RMiA
MCCLOSKEY RD
71-010
1000' E/O SAN FELIPE RD
1 MILE FROM START
26
5280
RMaC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-010
WILLOW CREEK RD
1 MI E/O WILL CREEK RD
26
5280
RMiC
PANOCHE RD
98-140
13 MI E/SHWY 25
14 MI E/SHWY 25
26
5280
RMaC
RIVERSIDE RD
81-020
NASH ROAD
UNION RD
26
3375
RMiC
SALINAS RD
3-010
CL @ SAN JUAN-HOLLISTER RD
MISSION VINEYARD
26
1225
RMaC
JOHN SMITH RD
1 MI S/ JOHN SMITH RD
26
5280
RMiC
MISSION VINEYARD
26
3975
RL
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD SJ/HOLL (SJ CYN RD - 156)
130-070
151C-010 THE ALAMEDA
THOMAS RD
88-020
1 MI S/ SOUTHSIDE RD
2 MI S/ SOUTHSIDE RD
26
5280
RL
WILLOW CREEK RD
112-010
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
1 MI N OLD HERNANDEZ RD
26
5280
RL
FAIRVIEW RD
53-100
MCCLOSKY RD
SANTA ANA RD
25
4775
RPA
HUDNER LN
46-020
RR TRACKS
END COUNTY LINE
25
830
RL
NEW IDRIA RD
107-030
2 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
3 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
25
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-050
4 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
5 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
25
5280
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-020
1 MI E/O WILLOW CREEK RD
2 MI E/O WILLOW CREEK RD
25
5280
RMiC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-030
1 MI S/O PCC
2 MI S/O PCC
25
5280
RMaC
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-050
3 MI S/O PCC
4 MI S/O PCC
25
5280
RMaC
SAN JUSTO RD
23-040
1 MI S/ PRESCOTT RD
LUCY BROWN LN
25
4190
RMaC
SANTA ANITA RD
74-040
3 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
4 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
25
5280
RL
WILLOW GROVE SCHOOL RD
94-010
SHWY 25
END
25
724
RL
CARR AVE
14-010
CARPENTERIA AVE
ARRIBA DR
24
4175
RMaC
FAIRVIEW RD
53-110
SANTA ANA RD
HILLCREST RD
24
3115
RPA
12
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
JOHN SMITH RD
78-040
COP E/O LANDFILL ENTRANCE
1 MI E/LANDFILL ENT.
24
5280
RMaC
OLD AIRLINE HWY
150-020
1 MI S/O CIENEGA RD
2 MI S/O CIENEGA RD
24
5280
RMiC
OLD AIRLINE HWY
150-030
2 MI S/O CIENEGA RD
SHWY 25
24
1368
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-040
3 MI E/O WILLOW CREEK RD
END OF PAVEMENT
24
2080
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-210
START OF PAVEMENT
1 MI S/ PAVEMENT
24
5070
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-250
4 MI S/ PAVEMENT
COALINGA RD
24
5425
RMiC
PANOCHE RD
98-240
23 MI E/SHWY 25
24 MI E/SHWY 25
24
5280
RMaC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-060
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
1 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
24
5280
RMiC
SANTA ANITA RD
74-030
2 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
3 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
24
5280
RL
THOMAS RD
88-030
2 MI S/ SOUTHSIDE RD
SOUTHSIDE RD
24
3850
RL
BIXBY RD
30-010
SHWY 156
FREITAS RD
23
2660
RMaC
BUENA VISTA RD
34-010
WEST END
HWY 156 W/S
23
3290
RMaC
COALINGA RD
109-010
SHWY 25
1 MILE
23
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-180
17 MILE
18 MILE
23
5280
RMiC
LITTLE MERRILL RD
10-010
ROCKS RD
NORTH END
23
1730
RL
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-060
5 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
6 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
23
5280
RMaC
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-070
6 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
FRESNO CO LN
23
1033
RMaC
LONOAK/KING CITY RD
152-040
3 MI E/O MON CO LN
4 MI E/O MON CO LN
23
5280
RMiA
NEW IDRIA RD
107-010
PANOCHE RD
1 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
23
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-210
20 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
END AT CATTLE GUARD
23
2950
RMiC
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-230
2 MI S/ PAVEMENT
3 MI S/ PAVEMENT
23
5280
RMiC
PANOCHE RD
98-160
15 MI E/SHWY 25
16 MI E/SHWY 25
23
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-200
19 MI E/SHWY 25
20 MI E/SHWY 25
23
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-230
22 MI E/SHWY 25
23 MI E/SHWY 25
23
5280
RMaC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-100
4 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
5 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
23
5280
RMiC
13
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
SAN JUAN CYN RD
2-020
END PCC
1 MI S/O PCC
23
5280
RMaC
SANTA ANITA RD
74-010
QUIEN SABE RD
1 MI S/ QUIEN SABE RD
23
5280
RL
CIENEGA RD
83-220
4 MI S/O THOUSAND TRAIL ENTRANCE
AIRLINE HWY
22
1400
RMaC
COALINGA RD
109-050
4 MILE
5 MILE
22
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-120
11 MILE
12 MILE
22
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-130
12 MILE
13 MILE
22
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-170
16 MILE
17 MILE
22
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-190
18 MILE
19 MILE
22
5280
RMiC
FOURTH ST
22
350
RL
D STREET - TP
129A-010 FIFTH ST
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-010
PANOCHE RD
1 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
22
5280
RMaC
MANSFIELD RD
75-010
FAIRVIEW RD
END
22
2662
RL
OLD AIRLINE HWY
150-010
CIENEGA RD
1 MI S/O CIENEGA RD
22
5280
RMiC
PANOCHE RD
98-310
1 MI E/ NORTON RD
NEW IDRIA RD
22
5496
RMaC
SALINAS RD
3-030
1 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
2 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
22
5280
RMaC
SALINAS RD
3-040
2 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
3 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
22
5280
RMaC
2 MI S/ RODEO DR
3 MI S/ RODEO DR
22
5280
RMiC
END
22
390
RL
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD THIRD STREET - TP
130-040
129 E-010 F STREET
THOMAS RD
88-010
SOUTHSIDE RD
1 MI S/ SOUTHSIDE RD
22
5280
RL
WILLOW CREEK RD
112-020
1 MI N OLD HERNANDEZ RD
2 MI N OLD HERNANDEZ RD
22
5280
RL
BEST RD
79-020
0.109 N/SHWY 25
HARBERN WAY
21
3400
RMiC
BLOSSOM LN
89-010
END
SOUTHSIDE RD
21
2534
RL
BREEN RD
38-010
SHWY 156
END
21
4425
RL
CHURCHILL RD
57-010
END
FAIRVIEW RD
21
3125
RMiC
CIENEGA RD
83-060
HIDDEN VALLEY RD
1 MI S/O HIDDEN VALLEY RD
21
5280
RMaC
COALINGA RD
109-230
22 MILE
23 MILE
21
5280
RMiC
14
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
COALINGA RD
109-240
23 MILE
24 MILE
21
5280
RMiC
FRYE LANE
51-010
SHORE RD
SOUTH END
21
3180
RMiC
GRANT RD
62-010
FALLON RD
NORTH END
21
4784
RL
LONOAK/KING CITY RD
152-010
MON CO LN WEST
1 MI E/O MON CO LN
21
5280
RMiA
NORTH FORK RD
67-010
END OF PAVEMENT
W/S BRIDGE (MON CO LN)
21
5500
RL
OLD HERNANDEZ RD
110-220
1 MI S/ PAVEMENT
2 MI S/ PAVEMENT
21
5280
RMiC
PANOCHE RD
98-290
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
NORTON RD
21
5240
RMaC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-090
3 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
4 MI E/ SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
21
5280
RMiC
ROSA MORADA RD
68-010
FAIRVIEW RD
DOOLING RD
21
2655
RMiC
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
130-050
3 MI S/ RODEO DR
4 MI S/ RODEO DR
21
5280
RMiC
ARROYO SECO DR
59A-010
COMSTOCK
END
20
2128
RL
COALINGA RD
109-090
8 MILE
9 MILE
20
5280
RMiC
COMSTOCK RD
59-040
1 MI E/O CANYON DR
2 MI E/O CANYON DR
20
5280
RMiC
F STREET - TP
129F-020 END
QUIEN SABE RD
20
626
RL
FIFTH STREET - TP
129D-010 F STREET
SOUTHSIDE RD
20
227
RL
GRASS VALLEY RD
87-010
CIENEGA RD
1 MI W/O CIENEGA RD
20
5280
RL
LONE TREE RD
69-110
9 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
10 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
20
5280
RMiC
LONOAK/KING CITY RD
152-020
1 MI E/O MON CO LN
2 MI E/O MON CO LN
20
5280
RMiA
NEW IDRIA RD
107-020
1 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
2 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
20
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-200
19 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
20 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
20
5280
RMiC
NORTH FORK RD
67-020
W/S BRIDGE (MON CO LN)
1 MI E/O BRIDGE
20
5280
RL
PANOCHE RD
98-180
17 MI E/SHWY 25
18 MI E/SHWY 25
20
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-250
24 MI E/SHWY 25
25 MI E/SHWY 25
20
5280
RMaC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-040
2 MI E/ HWY 25
3 MI E/ HWY 25
20
5280
RMiC
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
130-060
4 MI S/ RODEO DR
JOHN SMITH RD
20
3550
RMiC
15
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
BEST RD
79-030
HARBERN WAY
JOHN SMITH RD
19
3668
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-210
20 MILE
21 MILE
19
5280
RMiC
COMSTOCK RD
59-030
CANYON DR
1 MI E/O CANYON DR
19
5280
RMiC
GRASS VALLEY RD
87-020
1 MI W/O CIENEGA RD
END
19
4150
RL
LONE TREE RD
69-060
4 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
5 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
19
5280
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-080
6 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
7 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
19
5280
RMiC
PANOCHE RD
98-260
25 MI E/SHWY 25
26 MI E/SHWY 25
19
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-270
26 MI E/SHWY 25
27 MI E/SHWY 25
19
5280
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-280
27 MI E/SHWY 25
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
19
4850
RMaC
PANOCHE RD
98-330
1 MI E/ NEW IDRIA RD
2 MI E/ NEW IDRIA RD
19
5280
RMaC
QUIEN SABE RD
92-050
3 MI E/ HWY 25
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
19
2164
RMiC
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
130-080
1 MI S/ JOHN SMITH RD
QUIEN SABE RD
19
4100
RMiC
SCHOOL RD
20-020
FOREST RD
1 MI S/ FOREST RD
19
5280
RL
SPRING GROVE RD
63-030
BENITO RD
END
19
1775
RL
COALINGA RD
109-140
13 MILE
14 MILE
18
5280
RMiC
DOOLING RD
68A-010
ROSA MORADA RD
FALLON RD
18
4552
RMiC
F STREET - TP
129F-010 3RD STREET
NORTH END
18
1352
RL
HARBERN WAY
79A-010
END
BEST RD
18
2398
RL
LOMA VISTA AVE
145-010
VALLEY VIEW RD
END
18
1051
RL
LONE TREE RD
69-050
3 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
4 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
18
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-180
17 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
18 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
18
5280
RMiC
PANOCHE RD
98-170
16 MI E/SHWY 25
17 MI E/SHWY 25
18
5280
RMaC
SALINAS RD
3-060
4 MI W/ SAN JUAN CYN RD
MON CO LN
18
1162
RMaC
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
130-020
RODEO DR
1 MI S/ RODEO DR
18
5280
RMiC
SANTA ANA VALLEY RD
130-030
1 MI S/ RODEO DR
2 MI S/ RODEO DR
18
5280
RMiC
16
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
BRIGGS RD
141-010
N HWY 25
SHWY 25
17
2769
RL
CARPENTER DR
162-010
FALLON RD
MCMAHON RD
17
4578
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-200
19 MILE
20 MILE
17
5280
RMiC
HIGHLAND DR
124-010
FARRAGOT DR
SUNNYSLOPE RD
17
1200
RL
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-030
2 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
3 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
17
5280
RMaC
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-040
3 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
4 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
17
5280
RMaC
LONE TREE RD
69-040
2 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
3 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
17
5280
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-070
5 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
6 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
17
5280
RMiC
LONOAK/KING CITY RD
152-050
4 MI E/O MON CO LN
MON CO LN EAST
17
3240
RMiA
NEW IDRIA RD
107-070
6 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
7 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
17
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-190
18 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
19 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
17
5280
RMiC
PAN TEMPO WAY
69A-010
LONE TREE RD
SOUTH END
17
2308
RL
PANOCHE RD
98-190
18 MI E/SHWY 25
19 MI E/SHWY 25
17
5280
RMaC
BENITO RD
65-010
MCMAHON
SPRING GROVE RD
16
1695
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-110
10 MILE
11 MILE
16
5280
RMiC
COALINGA RD
109-220
21 MILE
22 MILE
16
5280
RMiC
MORADA LN
68B-010
DOOLING RD
END
16
2400
RL
NEW IDRIA RD
107-100
9 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
10 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
16
5280
RMiC
COMSTOCK RD
59-050
2 MI E/O CANYON DR
END
15
5716
RMiC
FOOTHILL RD
55-010
ORCHARD RD
END
15
5725
RL
NEW IDRIA RD
107-040
3 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
4 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
15
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-090
8 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
9 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
15
5280
RMiC
BRIGGS RD
141-020
S HWY 25
WRIGHT RD
14
1048
RL
COALINGA RD
109-150
14 MILE
15 MILE
14
5280
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-100
8 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
9 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
14
5280
RMiC
17
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
NEW IDRIA RD
107-060
5 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
6 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
14
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-080
7 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
8 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
14
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-110
10 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
11 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
14
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-120
11 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
12 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
14
5280
RMiC
NORTH FORK RD
67-030
1 MI E/O BRIDGE
HWY 198
14
4715
RL
CHAPPELL RD
72-030
PACIFIC WAY
END
13
710
RMiC
HILL TOP RD
135-010
VALLEY VIEW RD
EAST END
13
507
RL
LUCY BROWN LN
25-030
SAN JUSTO RD
END
13
975
RL
MURPHY RD
93-020
1 MI E/O HWY 25
WEST END
13
3580
RL
NORTH CHAPPELL RD - (1/2 CITY)
72-040
0.04M E/KIRKPATRICK DR
END
13
725
RMiC
PANOCHE RD
98-300
NORTON RD
1 MI E/ NORTON RD
13
5280
RMaC
LONE TREE RD
69-090
7 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
8 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
12
5280
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-130
12 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
13 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
12
5280
RMiC
ORCHARD RD
54-030
FOOTHILL RD
PRIVATE ROAD
12
3117
RMiC
BARNHEISEL RD
143-010
SHWY 156
END
11
3818
RL
LITTLE PANOCHE RD
101-020
1 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
2 MI N/ PANOCHE RD
11
5280
RMaC
MILLER RD
35-010
BUENA VISTA RD
WEST SIDE RD
11
1188
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-170
16 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
17 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
11
5280
RMiC
SEARLE RD
154-010
HWY 129
ANZAR RD
11
3830
RMiC
LAKE ROAD
48-010
SHORE RD
NORTH END
10
4901
RL
SCAGLIOTTI RD
61-010
END
FALLON RD
10
4930
RL
ACQUISTAPACE RD
58-010
FAIRVIEW RD
END
9
2750
RMiC
VALLEY VIEW RD
96-010
CL 530' S/ CRESCENT LN
CRESTVIEW LN
9
856
RMiC
LONE TREE RD
69-120
10 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
11 MI E/O MAGLADRY RD
8
820
RMiC
NEW IDRIA RD
107-140
13 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
14 MI S/ PANOCHE RD
8
5280
RMiC
18
San Benito County Street List PCI High-Low Street Name
Section ID
From
To
Inspected PCI
Length
Functional Class
MCCONNELL RD
45-010
HWY 25
HWY 156
3
300
RL
BEST RD
79-010
SHWY 25
0.109 N/SHWY 25
2
576
RMiC
AROMITAS RD
18-020
COP
ANZAR RD
0
3650
RMiC
BUENA VISTA RD (1/2 CITY)
34-040
MILLER RD
LOCUST AVE
3275
RMaC
NASH RD
82-010
RIVERSIDE RD
PCC BRIDGE
2150
RMiC
NASH RD
82-020
S/PCC BRIDGE
N/PCC BRIDGE
310
RMiC
NASH RD
82-030
PCC BRIDGE
CITY LIMIT
380
RMiC
19
GIS TOOLBOX This section is intended to introduce the new feature in StreetSaver. The GIS portion of the program is specifically designed for those agencies that do not have “in-house” GIS departments. GIS TOOLBOX The GIS toolbox is a new feature available within StreetSaver. This is one of the most powerful tools available in StreetSaver. The ability to link the existing road segments to a base map and produce maps displaying the Current Condition, Age of Pavement, Needs Treatments, Scenario Treatments, Last Treatment and Last Year Inspected are now available with just a few key strokes. No longer does an agency need to access “outside resources” or “wait” for graphical representations of their road system. Maps that reflect the current condition of an agency’s road system are a valuable asset when meeting with City Councils and the general public. A map of future maintenance treatments can be used to inform the residents when future work is scheduled on their road. A basic “shapefile” is already loaded into the StreetSaver system. From this shapefile it is just a matter of “linking” or “assigning” the beginning location and ending location of each management section found in the database. There are a few cautions that the City of Hollister should be aware of in regard to the GIS mapping. GIS is a “node” to “node” application. It uses intersections or nodes as its way to pinpoint a specific location. This means that each of the City’s management sections needs to begin and end at a point that can be defined or found by the GIS link. Using house numbers or change in pavements will need to be defined as “feet” from the nearest “node”. This will produce a more precise map. Next the Street Names will need to match and that will mean a more precise accounting of “street tags”. The difference between calling a tag a “drive” or an “avenue” can hinder the linking process. TERMINOLOGY Once the GIS Toolbox is opened there will be two master items that can be accessed. First there is the “GIS Reporting”. This screen is used to “mine” StreetSaver data for display in GIS format. Queries can be performed using the standard StreetSaver filter screen, using pre-defined criteria defined by the system, or by selecting an area of the map. If Section data is returned those shapes can be exported to GIS shapefiles or printed out in a map format.
Then there is the “Section Link” screen which will match segments in the basemap based on street name, type (street tag) and/or direction. Each Section can be linked to a segment or segments in the basemap. Explanations of the toolbars and the buttons available on the GIS Reporting screen are outlined below: Navigation Toolbar
Reporting Toolbar
BASE MAP IMPLEMENTATION Pavement Engineering Inc. reviewed the base map included with StreetSaver and the automatic linking process. The review found most of the segments were linked correctly. Any of the segments that were not previously linked were fixed so they were linked.
San Benito County
Network Summary Statistics Printed: 08/08/2016
Total Sections
Total Center Miles
Total Lane Miles
PCI
Rural Minor Arterial (4)
31
21.84
43.68
43
Rural Principal Arterial-Other (3)
32
21.02
42.05
47
Rural Major Collector (5)
129
108.51
217.02
37
Rural Minor Collector (6)
149
120.39
240.78
27
Rural Local (7)
112
64.71
129.41
33
** Combined
60
52.00
104.01
N/A
Rural Major Collector (5) Rural Minor Collector (6) Gravel
1 3 56
0.62 0.54 50.85
1.24 1.08 101.69
N/A N/A N/A
Total
513
388.48
776.95
Overall Network PCI as of 8/8/2016:
35
** Combined Sections are those without a PCI Date - they have not been inspected or had a Treatment applied.
Criteria:
1 SS1013
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Network Replacement Cost Printed: 08/08/2016
Lane Miles
Unit Cost/ Square Foot
AC
129.4
$9.09
6,827,344
$62,083
AC
217.6
$9.09
13,235,740
$120,357
Functional Class
Surface Type
Rural Local (7) Rural Major Collector (5)
PCC Rural Minor Arterial (4)
AC PCC
Rural Minor Collector (6)
AC PCC
Rural Principal Arterial-Other (3)
AC PCC Grand Total:
Criteria:
Pavement Area/ Square Feet
Cost To Replace (in thousands)
0.7
$9.09
28,800
$262
42.8
$13.78
2,924,715
$40,303
0.8
$13.78
56,070
$773
241.7
$9.09
12,496,950
$113,639
0.1
$9.09
7,750
$70
41.8
$13.78
3,719,614
$51,256
0.2
$13.78
18,900
$260
39,315,883
$389,002
675.3
1 SS1012
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Arterial
AC
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$64.04
V - Very Poor AC/AC
AC/PCC
PCC
I - Very Good
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$1.32 $3.96
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$3.96
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$64.04
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
2
3 5 2
$124.02
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$3.96
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)
I - Very Good
5
$124.02
Crack Treatment
II - Good, Non-Load Related
I - Very Good
3
3 5 2
$64.04 $124.02
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$0.00
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$0.00
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
3 99 100
$64.04 $124.02
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
1
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Arterial
ST
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$0.00
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$0.00
IV - Poor
DO NOTHING
$0.00
V - Very Poor
DO NOTHING
$0.00
9 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
2
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Collector
AC
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
V - Very Poor AC/AC
AC/PCC
PCC
I - Very Good
$1.32 $2.97
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$2.97
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$2.97
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
I - Very Good
4
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.11
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.51
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
7 3
4 7 3
4 7 3
9 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
3
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Collector
ST
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.11
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.51
IV - Poor
DO NOTHING
$1.92
V - Very Poor
DO NOTHING
$7.47
9 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
4
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Residential/Local
AC
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
V - Very Poor AC/AC
AC/PCC
PCC
I - Very Good
$1.32 $2.97
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$2.97
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$2.97
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
I - Very Good
4
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.11
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$0.00
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
8 3
4 8 3
4 8 3
4 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
5
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Residential/Local
ST
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.11
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.51
IV - Poor
DO NOTHING
$1.92
V - Very Poor
DO NOTHING
$7.27
9 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
6
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Other
AC
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
V - Very Poor AC/AC
AC/PCC
PCC
I - Very Good
$1.32 $2.97
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$2.97
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$2.97
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
I - Very Good
4
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.11
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.51
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
8 3
4 8 3
4 8 3
9 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
7
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Other
ST
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.11
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.51
IV - Poor
DO NOTHING
$1.92
V - Very Poor
DO NOTHING
$7.27
9 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
8
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Arterial
AC
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$64.04
V - Very Poor AC/AC
AC/PCC
PCC
I - Very Good
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$1.32 $3.96
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$3.96
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$64.04
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
2
3 5 2
$124.02
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$3.96
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$40.99
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)
I - Very Good
5
$124.02
Crack Treatment
II - Good, Non-Load Related
I - Very Good
3
3 5 2
$64.04 $124.02
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$0.00
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$0.00
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
3 99 100
$64.04 $124.02
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
1
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Arterial
ST
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$0.00
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$0.00
IV - Poor
DO NOTHING
$0.00
V - Very Poor
DO NOTHING
$0.00
9 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
2
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Collector
AC
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
V - Very Poor AC/AC
AC/PCC
PCC
I - Very Good
$1.32 $2.97
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$2.97
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$2.97
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
I - Very Good
4
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.11
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.51
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
7 3
4 7 3
4 7 3
9 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
3
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Collector
ST
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.11
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.51
IV - Poor
DO NOTHING
$1.92
V - Very Poor
DO NOTHING
$7.47
9 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
4
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Residential/Local
AC
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
V - Very Poor AC/AC
AC/PCC
PCC
I - Very Good
$1.32 $2.97
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$2.97
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$2.97
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
I - Very Good
4
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.11
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$0.00
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
8 3
4 8 3
4 8 3
4 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
5
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Residential/Local
ST
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.11
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.51
IV - Poor
DO NOTHING
$1.92
V - Very Poor
DO NOTHING
$7.27
9 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
6
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Other
AC
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
V - Very Poor AC/AC
AC/PCC
PCC
I - Very Good
$1.32 $2.97
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$2.97
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
SEAL CRACKS
$1.32
Surface Treatment
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
$2.97
Restoration Treatment
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
II - Good, Non-Load Related
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
$13.66
III - Good, Load Related
LIGHT REHAB
$31.42
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
I - Very Good
4
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.11
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.51
IV - Poor
HEAVY REHAB
$47.82
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$81.84
8 3
4 8 3
4 8 3
9 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
7
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Decision Tree Printed: 08/11/2016
Cost/Sq Yd, # of Surface Yrs Between Yrs Between except Seal Seals before Crack Seals Surface Seals Cracks in LF: Overlay
Functional Class
Surface
Condition Category
Treatment Type
Treatment
Other
ST
I - Very Good
Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Surface Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
Restoration Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00
II - Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.11
III - Good, Load Related
DO NOTHING
$1.51
IV - Poor
DO NOTHING
$1.92
V - Very Poor
DO NOTHING
$7.27
9 99 100
Functional Class and Surface combination not used Criteria:
8
MTC StreetSaver
Needs / Zero Dollars Unconstrained and Zero Budget ($312 Million over 5 Years) ($345.8 Million over 10 Years) Projected PCI/Cost Summary Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary Preventative Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary
San Benito County
Needs - Projected PCI/Cost Summary Inflation Rate =
Criteria:
3.00 %
Printed: 08/08/2016
Year
PCI Treated PCI Untreated
PM Cost
Rehab Cost
Cost
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
65 74 82 87 88
$437,106 $0 $35,989 $11,744 $35,346
$120,497,047 $71,228,634 $57,311,137 $41,619,269 $20,839,793
$120,934,153 $71,228,634 $57,347,126 $41,631,013 $20,875,139
% PM
PM Total Cost
Rehab Total Cost
Total Cost
0.17%
$520,185
$311,495,880
$312,016,065
37 33 28 24 20
1 SS1008
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Needs - Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary Inflation Rate =
Treatment
Year
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Area Treated 202,026.67 130,504.44 43,333.33 21,942.22 10,560 Total
HEAVY REHAB
2016 2017 2018 2019
LIGHT REHAB
2016 2018 Total
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
408,366.67 sq.yd.
$5,713,734
sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd.
sq.yd.
$35,971,008 $9,514,875 $6,455,164 $4,905,234
1,075,652.44 sq.yd.
$56,846,281
59,177.22 sq.yd. 15,388.89 sq.yd.
$2,207,694 $669,206
74,566.11 sq.yd.
$2,876,900
sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd.
sq.yd.
$79,558,654 $59,877,581 $49,558,783 $36,386,509 $20,677,438
2,737,517.22 sq.yd.
$246,058,965
sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd.
Total Cost
Criteria:
1 SS1010
Cost
sq.yd.
956,318.44 685,229 537,756.78 378,705.89 179,507.11 Total
Printed: 08/08/2016
$2,759,691 $1,836,178 $627,984 $327,526 $162,355
697,034.67 182,447.22 119,122.78 77,047.78 Total
3.00 %
$311,495,880
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Needs - Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary Inflation Rate =
Treatment
Year
Area Treated
$437,106
11,421.67 sq.yd.
$35,989
2019
sq.yd.
131,535.78
1,527.78 144,485.22
$4,959 $478,054
2019
4,693.73
ft.
$6,785
2020
23,743.45
ft.
$35,346
Total Total Quantity
Criteria:
Cost
2018
Total
SEAL CRACKS
Printed: 08/08/2016
sq.yd.
2016
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
3.00 %
1 SS1007
28,437.18
$42,131
172,922.41
$520,185
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Needs - Projected PCI/Cost Summary Inflation Rate =
Criteria:
Year
PCI Treated PCI Untreated
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
65 74 82 87 88 88 87 87 87 87
3.00 %
Printed: 08/08/2016
PM Cost
Rehab Cost
Cost
$437,106 $0 $35,989 $11,744 $35,346 $2,829,302 $826,348 $5,824,562 $6,422,522 $6,796,058
$120,497,047 $71,228,634 $57,311,137 $41,619,269 $20,839,793 $7,710,303 $2,859,644 $75,097 $368,752 $64,362
$120,934,153 $71,228,634 $57,347,126 $41,631,013 $20,875,139 $10,539,605 $3,685,992 $5,899,659 $6,791,274 $6,860,420
% PM
PM Total Cost
Rehab Total Cost
Total Cost
6.71%
$23,218,977
$322,574,038
$345,793,015
37 33 28 24 20 16 13 11 9 7
1 SS1008
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Needs - Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary Inflation Rate =
Treatment
Year
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Area Treated 202,026.67 130,504.44 43,333.33 21,942.22 10,560 118,277.78 19,861.11 4,470 21,310 3,611.11 Total
HEAVY REHAB
2016 2017 2018 2019
LIGHT REHAB
2016 2018 Total
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
575,896.67 sq.yd.
$8,418,908
sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd.
sq.yd.
$35,971,008 $9,514,875 $6,455,164 $4,905,234
1,075,652.44 sq.yd.
$56,846,281
59,177.22 sq.yd. 15,388.89 sq.yd.
$2,207,694 $669,206
74,566.11 sq.yd.
$2,876,900
sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd.
sq.yd.
$79,558,654 $59,877,581 $49,558,783 $36,386,509 $20,677,438 $5,837,291 $2,535,693
2,824,991.56 sq.yd.
$254,431,949
sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd. sq.yd.
Total Cost
Criteria:
1 SS1010
Cost
sq.yd.
956,318.44 685,229 537,756.78 378,705.89 179,507.11 61,526.11 25,948.22 Total
Printed: 08/08/2016
$2,759,691 $1,836,178 $627,984 $327,526 $162,355 $1,873,012 $323,951 $75,097 $368,752 $64,362
697,034.67 182,447.22 119,122.78 77,047.78 Total
3.00 %
$322,574,038
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Needs - Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary Inflation Rate =
Treatment
Year
Area Treated
$437,106
11,421.67 sq.yd.
$35,989
2019
sq.yd.
$4,959
276,663.78 sq.yd.
$1,270,098
131,535.78
1,527.78
2022
80,340 sq.yd.
$379,888
2023
1,316,018.56 sq.yd.
$4,933,032
2024
1,185,832.33 sq.yd.
$4,592,288
2025
648,132.44 sq.yd.
$2,624,370
Total
$14,277,730 $1,539,130
2022
8,805.56 sq.yd.
$430,981
2023
sq.yd.
$880,819
2024
45,760 sq.yd.
$1,821,337
2025
92,378.89 sq.yd.
$4,166,984
32,390
17,472.22
Total
196,806.67
$8,839,251
2019
4,693.73
ft.
$6,785
2020
23,743.45
ft.
$35,346
2021
13,091.58
ft.
$20,074
2022
9,794.87
ft.
$15,479
2023
6,581.17
ft.
$10,711
2024
5,311.07
ft.
$8,897
2025
2,725.4
ft.
$4,704
Total Total Quantity
Criteria:
3,651,472.33 sq.yd.
2021
SEAL CRACKS
Cost
2018
2021
LIGHT REHAB
Printed: 08/08/2016
sq.yd.
2016
LIGHT MAINTENANCE
3.00 %
1 SS1007
65,941.28
$101,996
3,914,220.28
$23,218,977
MTC StreetSaver
Maintain PCI ($79.8 Million over 5 Years) ($122.2 Million over 10 Years) Network Condition Summary Cost Summary Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
San Benito County
Target-Driven Scenarios Network Condition Summary Interest: 3%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Inflation: 3%
Scenario: MAINTAIN 37 Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Target: Overall 37
Projected Network Average PCI by year Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Never Treated 37 33 28 24 20
With Selected Treatment 37 37 37 37 37
Percent Network Area by Functional Classification and Condition Class Condition in base year 2016, prior to applying treatments. Condition Class
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
Total
I II / III IV V
1.6% 5.3% 9.6% 0.7%
2.0% 8.5% 38.2% 16.7%
0.8% 0.9% 11.2% 4.6%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4.4% 14.7% 59.0% 22.0%
Total
17.2%
65.4%
17.4%
0.0%
100.0%
Condition in year 2016 after schedulable treatments applied. Condition Class
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
Total
I II / III IV V
1.6% 5.3% 9.6% 0.7%
2.0% 8.5% 38.2% 16.7%
0.8% 0.9% 11.2% 4.6%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4.4% 14.7% 59.0% 22.0%
Total
17.2%
65.4%
17.4%
0.0%
100.0%
Condition in year 2020 after schedulable treatments applied. Condition Class
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
Total
I II / III IV V
8.5% 0.6% 1.5% 6.6%
20.7% 0.6% 0.0% 44.1%
3.4% 0.0% 3.2% 10.8%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
32.7% 1.2% 4.6% 61.5%
Total
17.2%
65.4%
17.4%
0.0%
100.0%
Scenarios Criteria:
1 SS1062
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Target-Driven Scenarios - Cost Summary Interest: 3%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Inflation: 3%
Scenario: MAINTAIN 37 Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI Year
Rehabilitation
2016
II
$0
III
$0
IV
$0
V
$0
Total
$0
Project
$0
2017
II
$0
III
$445,919
IV
$16,012,300
V
$0
Total
$16,458,219
Project
$0
2018
II
$440,812
III
$669,206
IV
$19,207,143
V
$0
Total
$20,317,161
Project
$0
II
$360,795
2019
III
$0
IV
$4,953,424
V
$17,442,685
Total
$22,756,904
Project
$0
II
$630,013
2020
III
$0
IV
$10,163,217
V
$8,998,475
Total
$19,791,705
Project
$0
Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential/Local
Total:
Scenarios Criteria:
Target: Overall 37 Preventive Maintenance NonProject
$0
Project
$0
NonProject
$450,222
Project
$0
NonProject
$35,989
Project
$0
NonProject
$4,959
Project
$0
NonProject
$3,563
Project
$0
Rehabilitation
Prev. Maint.
$20,082,186 $53,375,912 $5,865,891
$194,903 $234,775 $65,055
$79,323,989
$494,733
1 SS1063
Total Cost
Deferred
$0
$120,934,086
$16,908,441
$155,935,371
$20,353,150
$196,098,313
$22,761,863
$220,449,338
$19,795,268
$260,097,564
Summary
Grand Total: $79,818,722
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Target-Driven Scenarios Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles Interest: 3.00%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Inflation: 3.00%
Scenario: MAINTAIN 37 Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Target: Overall 37
Annual budget needs to meet target objectives
Preventative Maintenance
Year
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
2016
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total $0
2017
$8,650,993
$7,929,896
$327,552
$0
$450,222
$16,908,441
2018
$3,038,724
$12,776,106
$4,538,320
$0
$35,989
$20,353,150
2019
$3,471,109
$18,225,680
$1,065,074
$0
$4,959
$22,761,863
2020
$5,116,263
$14,679,005
$0
$0
$3,563
$19,795,268
Average Yearly Total: Grand Total:
$15,963,744 $79,818,722
Pavement Network prior to treatments in lane miles.
Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 48 35 35
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 1.6% 2.0% 0.8%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 10.3% 54.9% 15.7%
Remaining Life 7 3 4
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
2016 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 48 35 35
2017 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 55 34 32
2018 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
Scenarios Criteria:
PCI 53 33 36
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 1.6% 2.0% 0.8%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 10.3% 54.9% 15.7%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 4.5% 5.4% 0.7%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.1% 54.4% 16.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 5.9% 11.1% 2.7%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 50.8% 14.0%
1 SS1067
Remaining Life 7 3 4
Remaining Life 11 4 4
Remaining Life 11 5 7
MTC StreetSaver
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
2019 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 53 34 34
2020 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
Scenarios Criteria:
PCI 54 34 31
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 7.0% 16.1% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 46.4% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 8.5% 20.7% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 44.1% 14.0%
2 SS1067
Remaining Life 12 7 7
Remaining Life 13 8 7
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Target-Driven Scenarios Network Condition Summary Interest: 3%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Inflation: 3%
Scenario: MAINTAIN 37 Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Target: Overall 37
Projected Network Average PCI by year Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Never Treated 37 33 28 24 20 16 13 11 9 7
With Selected Treatment 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37
Percent Network Area by Functional Classification and Condition Class Condition in base year 2016, prior to applying treatments. Condition Class
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
Total
I II / III IV V
1.6% 5.3% 9.6% 0.7%
2.0% 8.5% 38.2% 16.7%
0.8% 0.9% 11.2% 4.6%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4.4% 14.7% 59.0% 22.0%
Total
17.2%
65.4%
17.4%
0.0%
100.0%
Condition in year 2016 after schedulable treatments applied. Condition Class
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
Total
I II / III IV V
1.6% 5.3% 9.6% 0.7%
2.0% 8.5% 38.2% 16.7%
0.8% 0.9% 11.2% 4.6%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4.4% 14.7% 59.0% 22.0%
Total
17.2%
65.4%
17.4%
0.0%
100.0%
Condition in year 2025 after schedulable treatments applied. Condition Class
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
Total
I II / III V
8.4% 0.8% 8.0%
29.4% 0.0% 36.0%
3.4% 0.0% 14.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
41.2% 0.8% 58.0%
Total
17.2%
65.4%
17.4%
0.0%
100.0%
Scenarios Criteria:
1 SS1062
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Target-Driven Scenarios - Cost Summary Interest: 3%
Inflation: 3%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Scenario: MAINTAIN 37 Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI Year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Scenarios Criteria:
Rehabilitation II
$0
III
$0
IV
$0
V
$0
Total
$0
Project
$0
II
$0
III
$445,919
IV
$16,012,300
V
$0
Total
$16,458,219
Project
$0
II
$440,812
III
$669,206
IV
$19,207,143
V
$0
Total
$20,317,161
Project
$0
II
$360,795
III
$0
IV
$4,953,424
V
$17,442,685
Total
$22,756,904
Project
$0
II
$630,013
III
$0
IV
$10,163,217
V
$8,998,475
Total
$19,791,705
Project
$0
II
$0
III
$0
IV
$1,101,031
V
$12,712,303
Total
$13,813,334
Project
$0
Target: Overall 37 Preventive Maintenance NonProject
$0
Project
$0
NonProject
$450,222
Project
$0
NonProject
$35,989
Project
$0
NonProject
$4,959
Project
$0
NonProject
$3,563
Project
$0
NonProject
$7,648
Project
$0
1 SS1063
Total Cost
Deferred
$0
$120,934,086
$16,908,441
$155,935,371
$20,353,150
$196,098,313
$22,761,863
$220,449,338
$19,795,268
$260,097,564
$13,820,982
$270,283,584
MTC StreetSaver
Year
Rehabilitation
2022
II
$0
III
$0
IV
$2,307,448
V
$7,425,949
Total
$9,733,397
Project
$0
2023
II
$228,668
III
$0
IV
$0
V
$8,168,377
Total
$8,397,045
Project
$0
II
$182,732
2024
III
$0
IV
$0
V
$4,379,128
Total
$4,561,860
Project
$0
II
$0
2025
III
$0
IV
$0
V
$2,255,250
Total
$2,255,250
Project
$0
Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential/Local
Total:
Scenarios Criteria:
Preventive Maintenance NonProject
$843,324
Project
$0
NonProject
$218,954
Project
$0
NonProject
$1,082,921
Project
$0
NonProject
$1,471,443
Project
$0
Rehabilitation
Prev. Maint.
$22,091,573 $89,855,918 $6,137,384
$1,831,169 $2,106,896 $180,958
$118,084,875
$4,119,023
2 SS1063
Total Cost
Deferred
$10,576,721
$276,139,873
$8,615,999
$278,564,990
$5,644,781
$282,542,817
$3,726,693
$288,763,708
Summary
Grand Total: $122,203,898
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Target-Driven Scenarios Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles Interest: 3.00%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Inflation: 3.00%
Scenario: MAINTAIN 37 Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Target: Overall 37
Annual budget needs to meet target objectives
Preventative Maintenance
Year
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
2016
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total $0
2017
$8,650,993
$7,929,896
$327,552
$0
$450,222
$16,908,441
2018
$3,038,724
$12,776,106
$4,538,320
$0
$35,989
$20,353,150
2019
$3,471,109
$18,225,680
$1,065,074
$0
$4,959
$22,761,863
2020
$5,116,263
$14,679,005
$0
$0
$3,563
$19,795,268
2021
$560
$13,819,393
$1,029
$0
$7,648
$13,820,982
2022
$2,845,689
$7,687,340
$43,692
$0
$843,324
$10,576,721
2023
$214,082
$8,173,083
$228,834
$0
$218,954
$8,615,999
2024
$248,830
$5,395,951
$0
$0
$1,082,921
$5,644,781
2025
$336,492
$3,276,360
$113,841
$0
$1,471,443
$3,726,693
Average Yearly Total: $12,220,390 Grand Total: $122,203,898 Pavement Network prior to treatments in lane miles.
Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 48 35 35
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 1.6% 2.0% 0.8%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 10.3% 54.9% 15.7%
Remaining Life 7 3 4
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
2016 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 48 35 35
2017 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
Scenarios Criteria:
PCI 55 34 32
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 1.6% 2.0% 0.8%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 10.3% 54.9% 15.7%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 4.5% 5.4% 0.7%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.1% 54.4% 16.0%
1 SS1067
Remaining Life 7 3 4
Remaining Life 11 4 4
MTC StreetSaver
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
2018 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 53 33 36
2019 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 53 34 34
2020 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 54 34 31
2021 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 51 36 28
2022 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 51 36 26
2023 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 49 38 23
2024 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
Scenarios Criteria:
PCI 47 39 21
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 5.9% 11.1% 2.7%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 50.8% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 7.0% 16.1% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 46.4% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 8.5% 20.7% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 44.1% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 8.5% 24.3% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 41.0% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 9.1% 26.1% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 39.3% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 9.1% 28.0% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 37.4% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 8.4% 29.0% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 36.5% 14.0%
2 SS1067
Remaining Life 11 5 7
Remaining Life 12 7 7
Remaining Life 13 8 7
Remaining Life 13 9 7
Remaining Life 14 10 6
Remaining Life 14 10 6
Remaining Life 13 10 6
MTC StreetSaver
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
2025 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
Scenarios Criteria:
PCI 46 40 20
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 8.4% 29.4% 3.4%
3 SS1067
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 36.0% 14.0%
Remaining Life 13 10 6
MTC StreetSaver
Current Budget ($2.5 Million over 5 Years) ($5.0 Million over 10 Years) Network Condition Summary Cost Summary Network Deferred Maintenance and Rehabilitation Summary
San Benito County
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary Interest: 3%
Inflation: 3%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Scenario: 500k/yr
Year
Budget
PM
Year
Budget
PM
Year
Budget
PM
2016
$500,000
15%
2018
$500,000
15%
2020
$500,000
15%
2017
$500,000
15%
2019
$500,000
15%
Projected Network Average PCI by year Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Never Treated 37 33 28 24 20
With Selected Treatment 37 33 29 24 20
Treated Centerline Miles 1.56 2.18 1.41 2.12 2.53
Treated Lane Miles 3.12 4.35 2.83 4.23 5.07
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition in base year 2016, prior to applying treatments. Condition I II / III IV V Total
Arterial 1.6% 5.3% 9.6% 0.7% 17.2%
Collector 2.0% 8.5% 38.2% 16.7% 65.4%
Res/Loc 0.8% 0.9% 11.2% 4.6% 17.4%
Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total 4.4% 14.7% 59.0% 22.0% 100.0%
Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total 4.6% 14.5% 58.9% 22.0% 100.0%
Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total 4.4% 2.7% 24.6% 68.2% 100.0%
Condition in year 2016 after schedulable treatments applied. Condition I II / III IV V Total
Arterial 1.7% 5.2% 9.5% 0.7% 17.2%
Collector 2.0% 8.5% 38.2% 16.7% 65.4%
Res/Loc 0.8% 0.9% 11.2% 4.6% 17.4%
Condition in year 2020 after schedulable treatments applied. Condition I II / III IV V Total
Scenarios Criteria:
Arterial 1.6% 1.7% 7.4% 6.6% 17.2%
Collector 2.1% 0.8% 11.8% 50.8% 65.4%
Res/Loc 0.8% 0.3% 5.5% 10.8% 17.4%
1 SS1035
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Scenarios - Cost Summary Interest: 3.00%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Inflation: 3.00%
Scenario: 500k/yr
Year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
PM
Budget
15%
$500,000
15%
15%
15%
15%
II
$32,633
III
$178,079
IV
$212,400
V
$0
Total
$423,112
Project
$0
$500,000
II
$0
III
$262,497
IV
$161,042
V
$0
Total
$423,539
Project
$0
$500,000
II
$10,869
III
$0
IV
$386,289
V
$0
Total
$397,158
Project
$0
$500,000
II
$0
III
$0
IV
$414,521
V
$0
Total
$414,521
Project
$0
$500,000
Preventative Maintenance
Surplus PM
Deferred
NonProject
$71,242
$3,758
$120,439,734
Project
$0
NonProject
$72,499
Project
$0
NonProject
$61,618
Project
$0
NonProject
$72,464
Project
$0
NonProject
$49,614
Project
$0
Rehabilitation
II
$25,198
III
$0
IV
$380,491
V
$0
Total
$405,689
Project
$0
Summary
$2,501
$172,078,453
$13,382
$222,237,133
$2,536
$255,757,557
$25,386
$307,057,130
Stop Gap Funded
$0
Unmet
$917,753
Funded
$0
Unmet
$591,136
Funded
$0
Unmet
$472,393
Funded
$0
Unmet
$339,853
Funded
$0
Unmet
$157,589
Rehabilitation
Prev. Maint.
Funded Stop Gap
Unmet Stop Gap
Arterial
$934,378
$94,164
$0
$311,470
Collector
$645,343
$204,112
$0
$1,748,037
Residential/Local
$484,298
$29,161
$0
$419,216
$2,064,019
$327,437
$0
$2,478,724
Functional Class
Grand Total:
Scenarios Criteria:
1 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Scenarios - Network Deferred Maintenance and Rehabilitation Summary
Interest: 3.00%
Inflation: 3.00%
Printed: 08/08/2016 Scenario: 500k/yr
Year
Budget
PM
Year
Budget
PM
Year
Budget
PM
2016 2017 2018 2019
$500,000
6%
$500,000
6%
6%
6%
$500,000
6%
2024 2025
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
6%
$500,000
6%
$500,000
6%
$500,000
6%
2020 2021 2022 2023
$500,000
6%
Area of analyzed pavement sections for which maintenance and/or rehabilitation were deferred for each analysis year by functional classification in square yards.
Analyzed Year
Deferred Area by Functional Classification in Sq Yd Arterial Collector Res/Loc
Other
Total
2016
364,916
1,304,616
352,718
0
2,022,250
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
312,073 313,071 377,672 474,657 512,646 545,720 595,573 538,677 548,273
1,735,249 2,080,843 2,177,257 2,413,391 2,509,593 2,594,233 2,664,179 2,696,220 2,744,324
361,385 440,952 470,827 525,228 585,308 617,196 620,954 631,820 698,381
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2,408,707 2,834,866 3,025,756 3,413,276 3,607,547 3,757,149 3,880,706 3,866,717 3,990,978
Percentage of analyzed pavement sections for which maintenance and/or rehabilitation were deferred for each analysis year by functional classification. Analyzed Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Scenarios Criteria:
Deferred Area Percentage by Functional Classification Arterial Collector Res/Loc 8.4% 7.2% 7.2% 8.7% 10.9% 11.8% 12.5% 13.7% 12.4% 12.6%
30.0% 39.9% 47.8% 50.0% 55.5% 57.7% 59.6% 61.2% 62.0% 63.1%
8.1% 8.3% 10.1% 10.8% 12.1% 13.5% 14.2% 14.3% 14.5% 16.1%
1 SS1037
Other
Total
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
46.5% 55.4% 65.2% 69.5% 78.4% 82.9% 86.3% 89.2% 88.9% 91.7%
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Scenarios - Network Deferred Maintenance and Rehabilitation Summary
Interest: 3.00%
Inflation: 3.00%
Printed: 08/08/2016 Scenario: 500k/yr
Year
Budget
PM
Year
Budget
PM
Year
Budget
PM
2016 2017
$500,000
15%
$500,000
15%
2020
$500,000
15%
$500,000
15%
2018 2019
$500,000
15%
Area of analyzed pavement sections for which maintenance and/or rehabilitation were deferred for each analysis year by functional classification in square yards. Deferred Area by Functional Classification in Sq Yd Collector Res/Loc
Analyzed Year
Arterial
Other
Total
2016 2017 2018
357,256 312,073 306,999
1,300,216 1,702,767 2,048,361
354,784 359,755 437,328
0 0 0
2,012,256 2,374,595 2,792,688
2019 2020
365,877 459,991
2,130,566 2,366,290
470,705 525,106
0 0
2,967,148 3,351,387
Percentage of analyzed pavement sections for which maintenance and/or rehabilitation were deferred for each analysis year by functional classification. Analyzed Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Scenarios Criteria:
Deferred Area Percentage by Functional Classification Arterial Collector Res/Loc 8.2% 7.2% 7.1% 8.4% 10.6%
29.9% 39.1% 47.1% 49.0% 54.4%
8.2% 8.3% 10.1% 10.8% 12.1%
1 SS1037
Other
Total
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
46.2% 54.6% 64.2% 68.2% 77.0%
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary Interest: 3%
Inflation: 3%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Scenario: 500k/yr
Year
Budget
PM
Year
Budget
PM
Year
Budget
PM
2016
$500,000
6%
2020
$500,000
6%
2024
$500,000
6%
2017 2018 2019
$500,000
6%
$500,000
6%
2025
$500,000
6%
$500,000
6%
$500,000
6%
$500,000
6%
2021 2022 2023
$500,000
6%
Projected Network Average PCI by year Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Never Treated 37 33 28 24 20 16 13 11 9 7
With Selected Treatment 37 33 29 24 20 17 14 11 10 8
Treated Centerline Miles 1.51 1.31 0.89 0.59 2.29 2.18 1.02 1.65 2.08 1.88
Treated Lane Miles 3.03 2.61 1.77 1.17 4.58 4.37 2.05 3.30 4.15 3.75
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition in base year 2016, prior to applying treatments. Condition I II / III IV V Total
Arterial 1.6% 5.3% 9.6% 0.7% 17.2%
Collector 2.0% 8.5% 38.2% 16.7% 65.4%
Res/Loc 0.8% 0.9% 11.2% 4.6% 17.4%
Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total 4.4% 14.7% 59.0% 22.0% 100.0%
Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total 4.7% 14.4% 59.0% 22.0% 100.0%
Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total 3.6% 1.7% 5.9% 88.8%
Condition in year 2016 after schedulable treatments applied. Condition I II / III IV V Total
Arterial 1.6% 5.3% 9.6% 0.7% 17.2%
Collector 2.3% 8.2% 38.2% 16.7% 65.4%
Res/Loc 0.8% 0.9% 11.2% 4.6% 17.4%
Condition in year 2025 after schedulable treatments applied. Condition I II / III IV V
Scenarios Criteria:
Arterial 1.4% 0.4% 4.1% 11.2%
Collector 1.6% 0.8% 0.9% 62.1%
Res/Loc 0.5% 0.6% 0.9% 15.4%
1 SS1035
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary Interest: 3%
Inflation: 3%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Scenario: 500k/yr
Total
Scenarios Criteria:
17.2%
65.4%
17.4%
2 SS1035
0.0%
100.0%
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Scenarios - Cost Summary Interest: 3.00%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Inflation: 3.00%
Scenario: 500k/yr
Year
PM
Budget
2016
6%
$500,000
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
6%
6%
6%
6%
6%
Scenarios Criteria:
II
$0
III
$460,827
IV
$0
V
$0
Total
$460,827
Project
$0
$500,000
II
$23,059
III
$445,919
IV
$0
V
$0
Total
$468,978
Project
$0
$500,000
II
$0
III
$0
IV
$429,080
V
$34,730
Total
$463,810
Project
$0
$500,000
II
$0
III
$0
IV
$446,068
V
$0
Total
$446,068
Project
$0
$500,000
II
$25,198
III
$0
IV
$420,498
V
$0
Total
$445,696
Project
$0
$500,000
Preventative Maintenance
Surplus PM
Deferred
NonProject
$27,842
$2,158
$120,445,418
Project
$0
NonProject
$20,546
Project
$0
NonProject
$28,300
Project
$0
NonProject
$4,998
Project
$0
NonProject
$735
Project
$0
NonProject
$4,484
Project
$0
Rehabilitation
II
$0
III
$0
IV
$439,253
V
$0
Total
$439,253
Project
$0
1 SS1034
$9,454
$1,700
$25,002
$29,265
$25,516
$172,325,595
$222,458,356
$255,925,872
$307,096,007
$339,563,804
Stop Gap Funded
$0
Unmet
$917,385
Funded
$0
Unmet
$591,334
Funded
$0
Unmet
$472,393
Funded
$0
Unmet
$339,620
Funded
$0
Unmet
$162,285
Funded
$0
Unmet $1,338,162
MTC StreetSaver
Year
PM
Budget
2022
6%
$500,000
2023
2024
2025
6%
6%
6%
II
$0
III
$0
IV
$458,257
V
$0
Total
$458,257
Project
$0
$500,000
II
$224,166
III
$0
IV
$218,781
V
$0
Total
$442,947
Project
$0
$500,000
II
$400,033
III
$0
IV
$45,433
V
$0
Total
$445,466
Project
$0
$500,000
Preventative Maintenance
Surplus PM
Deferred
NonProject
$20,614
$9,386
$373,207,121
Project
$0
NonProject
$20,056
Project
$0
NonProject
$22,525
Project
$0
NonProject
$28,816
Project
$0
Rehabilitation
II
$461,048
III
$0
IV
$0
V
$0
Total
$461,048
Project
$0
Summary
$9,944
$400,194,269
$7,475
$416,205,394
$1,184
$444,069,169
Stop Gap Funded
$0
Unmet
$906,947
Funded
$0
Unmet
$670,441
Funded
$0
Unmet
$446,797
Funded
$0
Unmet
$263,073
Rehabilitation
Prev. Maint.
Funded Stop Gap
Unmet Stop Gap
Arterial
$2,453,263
$96,789
$0
$818,891
Collector
$1,602,307
$41,795
$0
$4,230,372
$476,780
$40,332
$0
$1,059,174
$4,532,350
$178,916
$0
$6,108,437
Functional Class
Residential/Local Grand Total:
Scenarios Criteria:
2 SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
Increase PCI by 5 ($101.2 Million over 5 Years) ($145 Million over 5 Years) Network Condition Summary Cost Summary Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles
San Benito County
Target-Driven Scenarios Network Condition Summary Interest: 3%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Inflation: 3%
Scenario: INCREASE BY 5 Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Target: By Year
Year
Value
Year
Value
Year
Value
Year 1 Year 2
38 39
Year 3 Year 4
40 41
Year 5
42
Year
Value
Projected Network Average PCI by year Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Never Treated 37 33 28 24 20
With Selected Treatment 38 39 40 41 42
Percent Network Area by Functional Classification and Condition Class Condition in base year 2016, prior to applying treatments. Condition Class
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
Total
I II / III IV V
1.6% 5.3% 9.6% 0.7%
2.0% 8.5% 38.2% 16.7%
0.8% 0.9% 11.2% 4.6%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4.4% 14.7% 59.0% 22.0%
Total
17.2%
65.4%
17.4%
0.0%
100.0%
Condition in year 2016 after schedulable treatments applied. Condition Class
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
Total
I II / III IV V
2.8% 4.5% 9.2% 0.7%
2.3% 8.2% 38.2% 16.7%
0.8% 0.9% 11.2% 4.6%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5.9% 13.5% 58.6% 22.0%
Total
17.2%
65.4%
17.4%
0.0%
100.0%
Condition in year 2020 after schedulable treatments applied. Condition Class
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
Total
I II / III IV V
8.9% 0.6% 1.1% 6.6%
26.3% 0.5% 0.0% 38.6%
3.4% 0.0% 3.2% 10.8%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
38.7% 1.1% 4.3% 56.0%
Total
17.2%
65.4%
17.4%
0.0%
100.0%
Scenarios Criteria:
1 SS1062
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Target-Driven Scenarios Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles Interest: 3.00%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Inflation: 3.00%
Scenario: INCREASE BY 5 Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Target: By Year
Year
Value
Year
Value
Year
Value
Year 1 Year 2
38 39
Year 3 Year 4
40 41
Year 5
42
Annual budget needs to meet target objectives Year
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
2016
$2,756,685
$649,007
$63,160
$0
2017
$8,998,245
$13,255,159
$262,497
2018
$2,295,050
$18,694,585
$4,782,358
2019
$3,473,470
$21,366,237
2020
$2,803,865
$20,532,877
Year
Value
Preventative Maintenance
Total
$437,106
$3,468,852
$0
$0
$22,515,901
$0
$35,989
$25,771,993
$813,715
$0
$7,320
$25,653,422
$861
$0
$4,969
$23,337,603
Average Yearly Total: $20,149,554 Grand Total: $100,747,771 Pavement Network prior to treatments in lane miles.
Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 48 35 35
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 1.6% 2.0% 0.8%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 10.3% 54.9% 15.7%
Remaining Life 9 3 4
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
2016 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 51 36 35
2017 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 58 36 32
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 2.8% 2.3% 0.8%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 9.9% 54.9% 15.7%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 6.5% 8.3% 0.7%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 7.7% 51.9% 16.0% Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 7.7%
Remaining Life
47.8% 14.0%
7 7
Arterial
56
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 7.0%
Collector Residential
37 36
14.8% 3.1%
2018 Functional Class
Scenarios Criteria:
PCI
1 SS1067
Remaining Life 9 3 4
Remaining Life 12 5 4
12
MTC StreetSaver
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
2019 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 56 39 34
2020 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
Scenarios Criteria:
PCI 55 42 31
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 8.2% 20.4% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 7.7% 42.5% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 8.9% 26.3% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 7.7% 38.6% 14.0%
2 SS1067
Remaining Life 13 8 7
Remaining Life 14 10 7
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Target-Driven Scenarios - Cost Summary Interest: 3%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Inflation: 3%
Scenario: INCREASE BY 5 Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI Year
Value
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
38 39 40 41 42
Year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Scenarios Criteria:
Year
Target: By Year Value
Rehabilitation II
$0
III
$1,952,842
IV
$1,078,904
V
$0
Total
$3,031,746
Project
$0
II
$427,973
III
$262,497
IV
$21,825,431
V
$0
Total
$22,515,901
Project
$0
II
$415,066
III
$669,206
IV
$13,266,403
V
$11,385,329
Total
$25,736,004
Project
$0
II
$66,724
III
$0
IV
$4,905,234
V
$20,674,144
Total
$25,646,102
Project
$0
II
$630,013
III
$0
IV
$7,063,382
V
$15,639,239
Total
$23,332,634
Project
$0
Year
Value
Preventive Maintenance NonProject
$437,106
Project
$0
NonProject
$0
Project
$0
NonProject
$35,989
Project
$0
NonProject
$7,320
Project
$0
NonProject
$4,969
Project
$0
1 SS1063
Year
Value
Total Cost
Deferred
$3,468,852
$117,465,240
$22,515,901
$149,694,271
$25,771,993
$184,251,141
$25,653,422
$205,491,000
$23,337,603
$238,049,731
MTC StreetSaver
Year
Rehabilitation Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential/Local
Total:
Scenarios Criteria:
Preventive Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Prev. Maint.
$20,137,575 $74,266,242 $5,858,570
$189,740 $231,623 $64,021
$100,262,387
$485,384
2 SS1063
Total Cost
Deferred
Summary
Grand Total: $100,747,771
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Target-Driven Scenarios - Cost Summary Interest: 3%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Inflation: 3%
Scenario: INCREASE BY 5 Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10
Year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Scenarios Criteria:
Value
Year
Target: By Year Value
Year
Value
Year
Value
37 38 38 39 39 40 40 41 41 42
Rehabilitation II
$0
III
$0
IV
$0
V
$0
Total
$0
Project
$0
II
$427,973
III
$445,919
IV
$19,802,708
V
$0
Total
$20,676,600
Project
$0
II
$415,066
III
$669,206
IV
$15,349,808
V
$4,639,462
Total
$21,073,542
Project
$0
II
$66,724
III
$0
IV
$4,905,234
V
$21,253,563
Total
$26,225,521
Project
$0
II
$630,013
III
$0
IV
$10,163,217
V
$9,067,682
Total
$19,860,912
Project
$0
Preventive Maintenance NonProject
$0
Project
$0
NonProject
$450,222
Project
$0
NonProject
$35,989
Project
$0
NonProject
$4,959
Project
$0
NonProject
$3,619
Project
$0
1 SS1063
Total Cost
Deferred
$0
$120,934,086
$21,126,822
$151,716,993
$21,109,531
$190,997,007
$26,230,480
$211,859,821
$19,864,531
$251,181,161
MTC StreetSaver
Year
Rehabilitation
2021
II
$0
III
$0
IV
$1,101,031
V
$17,435,659
Total
$18,536,690
Project
$0
2022
II
$0
III
$0
IV
$2,052,212
V
$7,223,559
Total
$9,275,771
Project
$0
II
$75,097
2023
III
$0
IV
$0
V
$12,754,740
Total
$12,829,837
Project
$0
II
$355,773
2024
III
$0
IV
$0
V
$4,435,341
Total
$4,791,114
Project
$0
II
$64,362
2025
III
$0
IV
$0
V
$7,264,936
Total
$7,329,298
Project
$0
Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential/Local
Total:
Scenarios Criteria:
Preventive Maintenance NonProject
$9,194
Project
$0
NonProject
$864,859
Project
$0
NonProject
$198,180
Project
$0
NonProject
$1,350,012
Project
$0
NonProject
$1,404,729
Project
$0
Rehabilitation
Prev. Maint.
$22,069,913 $112,390,574 $6,138,798
$1,830,644 $2,309,231 $181,888
$140,599,285
$4,321,763
2 SS1063
Total Cost
Deferred
$18,545,884
$256,376,332
$10,140,630
$262,017,802
$13,028,017
$259,432,886
$6,141,126
$262,780,535
$8,734,027
$263,398,890
Summary
Grand Total: $144,921,048
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Target-Driven Scenarios Network Condition Summary Interest: 3%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Inflation: 3%
Scenario: INCREASE BY 5 Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Target: By Year
Year
Value
Year
Value
Year
Value
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
37 38 38
Year 4 Year 5 Year 6
39 39 40
Year 7 Year 8 Year 9
40 41 41
Year
Value
Year 10
42
Projected Network Average PCI by year Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Never Treated 37 33 28 24 20 16 13 11 9 7
With Selected Treatment 37 38 38 39 39 40 40 41 41 42
Percent Network Area by Functional Classification and Condition Class Condition in base year 2016, prior to applying treatments. Condition Class
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
Total
I II / III IV V
1.6% 5.3% 9.6% 0.7%
2.0% 8.5% 38.2% 16.7%
0.8% 0.9% 11.2% 4.6%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4.4% 14.7% 59.0% 22.0%
Total
17.2%
65.4%
17.4%
0.0%
100.0%
Condition in year 2016 after schedulable treatments applied. Condition Class
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
Total
I II / III IV V
1.6% 5.3% 9.6% 0.7%
2.0% 8.5% 38.2% 16.7%
0.8% 0.9% 11.2% 4.6%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
4.4% 14.7% 59.0% 22.0%
Total
17.2%
65.4%
17.4%
0.0%
100.0%
Condition in year 2025 after schedulable treatments applied. Condition Class
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
Total
I II / III V
8.4% 0.8% 8.0%
34.9% 0.0% 30.5%
3.4% 0.0% 14.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
46.7% 0.8% 52.5%
Total
17.2%
65.4%
17.4%
0.0%
100.0%
Scenarios Criteria:
1 SS1062
MTC StreetSaver
San Benito County
Target-Driven Scenarios Pavement Network Condition Lane Miles Interest: 3.00%
Printed: 08/08/2016
Inflation: 3.00%
Scenario: INCREASE BY 5 Objective: Minimum Network Average PCI
Target: By Year
Year
Value
Year
Value
Year
Value
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
37 38 38
Year 4 Year 5 Year 6
39 39 40
Year 7 Year 8 Year 9
40 41 41
Annual budget needs to meet target objectives
Year
Value
Year 10
42
Preventative Maintenance
Year
Arterial
Collector
Res/Loc
Other
2016
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total $0
2017
$9,373,007
$11,426,263
$327,552
$0
$450,222
$21,126,822
2018
$2,295,050
$14,032,123
$4,782,358
$0
$35,989
$21,109,531
2019
$3,471,109
$21,945,656
$813,715
$0
$4,959
$26,230,480
2020
$5,116,319
$14,748,212
$0
$0
$3,619
$19,864,531
2021
$503
$18,544,352
$1,029
$0
$9,194
$18,545,884
2022
$2,866,768
$7,229,230
$44,632
$0
$864,859
$10,140,630
2023
$192,371
$12,835,490
$156
$0
$198,180
$13,028,017
2024
$248,830
$5,719,255
$173,041
$0
$1,350,012
$6,141,126
2025
$336,600
$8,219,224
$178,203
$0
$1,404,729
$8,734,027
Average Yearly Total: $14,492,105 Grand Total: $144,921,048 Pavement Network prior to treatments in lane miles.
Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 48 35 35
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 1.6% 2.0% 0.8%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 10.3% 54.9% 15.7%
Remaining Life 7 3 4
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
2016 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 48 35 35
2017 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
Scenarios Criteria:
PCI 55 35 32
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 1.6% 2.0% 0.8%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 10.3% 54.9% 15.7%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 5.3% 7.0% 0.7%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 52.8% 16.0%
1 SS1067
Remaining Life 7 3 4
Remaining Life 11 4 4
MTC StreetSaver
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
2018 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 53 35 36
2019 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 53 37 34
2020 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 54 37 31
2021 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 51 41 28
2022 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 51 41 26
2023 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
PCI 49 44 23
2024 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
Scenarios Criteria:
PCI 47 45 21
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 5.9% 12.7% 3.1%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 49.6% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 7.0% 18.4% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 44.2% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 8.5% 23.1% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 41.9% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 8.5% 27.7% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 37.7% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 9.1% 29.4% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 36.0% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 9.1% 32.4% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 33.1% 14.0%
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 8.4% 33.3% 3.4%
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 32.1% 14.0%
2 SS1067
Remaining Life 11 6 7
Remaining Life 12 8 7
Remaining Life 13 9 7
Remaining Life 13 10 7
Remaining Life 14 11 6
Remaining Life 14 11 6
Remaining Life 13 12 6
MTC StreetSaver
Pavement Network after schedulable treatments applied in lane miles.
2025 Functional Class Arterial Collector Residential
Scenarios Criteria:
PCI 46 47 20
Percentage of the Network in Very Good Condition 8.4% 34.9% 3.4%
3 SS1067
Percentage of the Network in Poor or Very Poor Condition 8.0% 30.5% 14.0%
Remaining Life 13 12 6
MTC StreetSaver
DEFINITIONS This section is intended to define important pavement design acronyms and terms used when discussing a Pavement Management System (PMS).
GENERAL TERMS PMS - Pavement Management System - A program to aid in tracking the condition of roads and a means to help quantify the cost of maintaining the roads in a given area. TI - Traffic Index - Cars and light trucks have little impact on the pavement structure. Larger/Heavier trucks have very significant impacts on the pavement due to the high axle weights. The total EALs is converted into a design Traffic Index (TI). The design TI is the total number of EALs that the pavement will support before it begins to fail, regardless of the passage of time. Normally for a new pavement, the EALs over a 20_year period are used. For rehabilitation procedures such as overlays, 10 years is generally used. PCI - Pavement Condition Index - A rating scale for the condition of a road segment. 100 represents no defects and recent major rehabilitation. CRITICAL PCI - The PCI value at which the rate of loss increases with time, or the cost of applying a maintenance treatment increases significantly. CLS / FC - Functional Classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of traffic service that they are intended to provide. There are three highway functional classifications: arterial, collector, and local roads. All streets and highways are grouped into one of these classes, depending on the character of the traffic. Arterials - provide the highest level of service at the greatest speed for the longest uninterrupted distance, with some degree of access control. Collectors - provide a less highly developed level of service at a lower speed for shorter distances by collecting traffic from local roads and connecting them with arterials. Residential/Local - consists of all roads not defined as arterials or collectors and primarily provides access to land with little or no through movement. •
Excerpted from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration web site on “Functional Classification”.
EMULSION - A chemical added to water and asphalt that keeps the asphalt in a stable suspension in the water. 1
AC - Asphaltic Concrete - A plant mixed asphalt binder (asphalt cement that is classified according to the Standard Specification for Performance Graded Asphalt Binder) and aggregate (rocks) thoroughly mixed and compacted into a mass. PCC - Portland Cement Concrete OVERLAY - The placement of asphaltic concrete mix over an existing asphaltic concrete or portland cement concrete surface. Light Overlay - would include any overlay of less than 2 inches of asphalt. Heavy Overlay - is a thicker layer of asphalt and might include such items/operations as, but not limited to fabric, milling/grinding and reconstruction. PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE - Provides budget dollars for localized pavement repairs such as digouts and crack filling. SLURRY SEAL - Includes a graded aggregate along with emulsion and water. Generally squeegeed and generally consists of two layers. REFLECTIVE CRACKING - Cracks that occur in new “thin” overlays that are identical to the cracks that were present in the existing pavement. ALLIGATOR CRACKING - Alligator or fatigue cracking is a series of interconnecting cracks caused by fatigue failure of the asphalt concrete surface under repeated traffic loading. Cracking begins at the bottom of the asphalt surface (or stabilized base) where the stress and strain are highest under a wheel load. The cracks propagate to the surface initially as a series of parallel longitudinal cracks. After repeated traffic loading, the cracks connect, forming many sided, sharp-angled pieces that develop a pattern resembling chicken wire or the skin of an alligator. Alligator cracking occurs only in areas subjected to repeated traffic loading, such as wheel paths. (Pattern-type cracking that occurs over an entire area not subjected to loading is called “block cracking,” which is not a load-associated distress.) BLOCK CRACKING - Block cracks are interconnected cracks that divide the pavement into approximately rectangular pieces. Block cracking is caused mainly by shrinkage of the asphalt concrete and daily temperature cycling (which results in daily stress/strain cycling). It is not load-associated. Block cracking usually indicates that the asphalt has hardened significantly. Block cracking normally occurs over a large portion of the pavement area, but sometimes will occur only in non-traffic areas. This type of distress differs from alligator cracking in that alligator cracks form smaller, many-sided pieces with sharp angles. Also,
2
unlike block, alligator cracks are caused by repeated traffic loadings, and are therefore found only in traffic areas (i.e., wheel paths). LONGITUDINAL / TRANSVERSE CRACKING - Longitudinal cracks are parallel to the pavement’s centerline or laydown direction. Transverse cracks extend across the pavement at approximately right angles to the pavement centerline or direction of laydown. These types of cracks are not usually load-associated. WEATHERING & RAVELING - Weathering and raveling is the wearing away of the pavement surface due to a loss of asphalt or tar and dislodged aggregate particles. These distresses indicate that either the asphalt binder has hardened appreciably or that a poor quality mixture is present. In addition, raveling may be caused by certain types of traffic, i.e., tracked vehicles. Softening of the surface and dislodging of the aggregates due to oil spillage are also included under raveling. BUMPS & SAGS - Bumps are small, localized, upward displacements of the pavement surface. They are different from shoves in that shoves are caused by unstable pavement. Sags are small, abrupt, downward displacements of the pavement surface. If bumps appear in pattern perpendicular to traffic flow and are spaced at less than 3 m (10 ft), the distress is called corrugation. Distortion and displacement that occur over large areas of the pavement surface causing large and/or long dips in the pavement should be recorded at “swelling.” RUTTING / SHOVING - A rut is a surface depression in the wheel paths. Pavement uplift may occur along the sides of the rut, but, in many instances, ruts are noticeable only after a rainfall when the paths are filled with water. Rutting stems from a permanent deformation in any of the pavement layers or subgrades, usually caused by consolidated or lateral movement of the materials due to traffic load. Shoving is a permanent, longitudinal displacement of a localized area of the pavement surface caused by traffic loading. When traffic pushes against the pavement, it produces a short, abrupt wave in the pavement surface. This distress normally occurs only in unstable liquid asphalt mix (cutback or emulsion) pavements. PATCHING & UTILITY CUTS - A patch is an area of pavement that has been replaced with new material to repair the existing pavement. A patch is considered a defect no matter how well it is performing (a patched area or adjacent area usually does not perform as well as an original pavement section). Generally, some roughness is associated with this distress. POTHOLES - Most often are structurally related distresses and should not be confused with raveling and weathering.
3
PAVEMENT PRESERVATION - Applying the Right Treatment to the Pavement at the Right Time using the Right Materials.
Right
R-VALUE - A test to evaluate the base, subbase and subgrades of an area to be used in pavement designing for thickness of asphalt. ESAL - The impact of trucks is measured in equivalent single 18,000 pound axle loads (EALs).
STREETSAVER DEFINITIONS MANAGEMENT SECTION - This is used to maintain an inventory of all the roads and road sections in your jurisdiction. EVENTS – This provides for viewing and maintaining of Events or changes that have been made on a management section. The Events that are included are: • • • •
Management Section Creation. Results from Maintenance and Rehabilitation treatments that have been applied to the Management Section. Results from Visual Inspections of Management Sections. Listing of changes/edits of information on a Management Section.
DETERIORATION CURVE - This provides a graphical representation of the current pavement condition index and the historical PCIs for each section of road in your jurisdiction. MAINTENANCE/REHABILITATION - This is used to review the proposed maintenance, new maintenance, and rehabilitation for any road section in your jurisdiction. BRANCH - Generally a road name or a road name with a direction of travel. SECTION - Usually a branch or road is large and needs to be divided into smaller pieces to maintain. These smaller pieces are labeled as “sections” and designated with a number and a beginning and ending location. DISTRESSES - Defects found in asphalt concrete pavements or portland cement concrete. These defects degrade the condition of the road. RATING - The rating is the weight cost - effectiveness ratio of the recommended treatment. % OF ENVIRONMENT - The percentage of the pavement distress in a management section that is an environment related distress. 4
% LOAD RELATED - The percentage of the pavement distress in a management section that is load related distress (caused by excessive weight on the pavement surface). % OTHER - Is the percentage of the pavement section that is not a load related or environment related distress. ACTIVE - Indicates whether or not the current record is active. AREA - Contains the area of a section in square feet. This is automatically calculated using the values that are entered in the Length and Width fields. However, if the section is irregularly shaped the area can be entered by the user. AREA ID - Is an optional, jurisdiction defined field to identify the area in which the section is located. For example, each neighborhood or subdivision, or each geographic type (mountain, valley, coast, etc.) in the jurisdiction may be assigned a letter of the alphabet. BASE BUDGET - Provides an area for you to enter the dollar amount of your base budget. BASE BUDGET INCREASE FACTOR - Stores the percent that the base budget will increase each year. BASE PM SPLIT - Percent of the base budget that has been set aside for preventive maintenance. BEGINNING LOCATION - Identifies the point that defines the beginning of the section. This is generally the name of a cross road or other landmark. CONDITION - Column lists the condition levels (2-5) that require stop-gap treatments. COST/ SQ YD - Indicates the cost per square yard of road for the suggested treatment. CURRENT PCI - Calculated from either a visual inspection or a maintenance treatment. DESCRIPTION - Displays a description of the item named in the previous column in a grid. DISTRESS - Contains the type of distress present on a section of a road. END LOCATION - Identifies the point that defines the end of the section. This is generally the name of a cross road or other landmark. 5
EVENT ACTIVE - Indicates whether an Event is currently part of the active history for the current Section. EVENT PCI - The PCI after the selected Event occurred. EVENT TRANSACTION TYPE - Includes: Creation, Inspection, Treatment, Split, Combine, Attribute Change and Core Data Change. EVENT VALID - Indicates if an Event can be activated and made part of the valid events for the current section. FUNDING SOURCE - Is an optional, jurisdiction defined field to identify the funding source for the section; an example might be G for general fund. GENERAL CODE - Is an optional, jurisdiction defined field used to identify sections of pavement sharing common characteristics, i.e., drainage type. INFLATION RATE - Is the inflation used throughout your jurisdiction. You may wish to consult your financial department with this value. INSPECTION AREA - Is the total area of the inspection unit. INTEREST RATE - Contains the interest rate used throughout your jurisdiction. LIFE EXTENSION - Is the number of years that a maintenance treatment extends the life of a pavement surface. MAINTENANCE DATE - Displays the date the maintenance was completed. MANAGEMENT UNIT - Relates a project to a management unit. MILEPOSTS - Display the beginning and ending points of a management section. NEW PCI - Stores the PCI value that was calculated after a treatment was applied. NUMBER OF SURFACE SEALS BEFORE OVERLAY - Displays the recommended number of surface seals before the application of an overlay. OLD PCI - Displays the pavement condition index before a treatment was applied. OTHER - Displays the weighting factor applied to management sections with functional classes other than arterial, collector, and residential. 6
OVERLAY - Displays the overlay code that corresponds to an overlay procedure. OVERLAY CODE - Is an identifier for the treatment type; use one of the six codes from the pop-up list that appears when this is activated. PCI CAP - Stores the maximum PCI value that will be included in needs and scenario calculations. If a PCI value is larger than the PCI Cap value, it will not be included. PCI EFFECTIVENESS CUT-OFF - Contains the minimum PCI value used in calculating the area under the projected performance curve. That area is used in ranking sections needing work, and the area below the PCI Cut-Off value is not included in that area. It should generally be the lowest PCI value that defines the minimum acceptable condition for all of the pavement types and functional classification groupings. PCI HIGH - LOW > 25 - Is marked if the difference between the high and low PCI values is greater than 25. PCI HIGH VALUE - Is the maximum PCI value for an inspection unit used in the last PCI calculation for a management unit. PCI LOW VALUE - Is the minimum PCI value for an inspection unit used in the last PCI calculation for a management unit. PM% - Scenarios based on a yearly budget, this column stores the percent that has been set aside for preventive maintenance. REPLACEMENT COST - Is the cost per square yard to install a new pavement surface. RESIDENTIAL $ - Indicates the cost of a stop-gap treatment per square yard when applied to a road with a residential functional class and a given condition. ROAD ID - Contains a two-character identifier that was assigned to the road. The combination of Road Number, Road Name, and Road ID must be unique for each road section. ROAD NAME - Displays the name of the road that corresponds to the road number and road ID. The combination of Road Number, Road Name, and Road ID must be unique for each road section. ROAD NUMBER - Contains the number that was assigned to a road. The combination of Road Number, Road Name, and Road ID must be unique for each road section. 7
SECTION ID - Is an identifier that is unique for each section of a given street. Note that the Street ID and the Section ID combined describe the individual section. Therefore, that combination must be unique. The same Section ID can be reused as long as it is used in conjunction with a different Street ID each time. SEGMENT LENGTH - Is the length in feet of the management section. SELECT MANAGEMENT SECTIONS - Allows you to calculate PCI values based on selected management sections. If this button is marked, the management sections that have had records updated since the last calculations are displayed in a grid. Select the management sections you want included in the calculations from this grid. SPECIAL - Check box is marked if the displayed inspection unit is nonrepresentative of a section as a whole. SPECIAL UNIT - The information will either be Y or blank. Y is an indication that this inspection unit is in some way non-representative of the section as a whole, and would receive a different maintenance/rehabilitation treatment from the rest of the section. STANDARD INSPECTION UNITS - Is the typical number of inspection units that would be used for a particular management section. STOP-GAP APPLICATION INTERVAL - Indicates the number of years between the applications of stop-gap treatments. STREET ID - Is an identifier that is unique for each street. The Street ID usually bears some similarity to the actual street name. STREET NAME - Is the full name of the street including “Street”, “Way”, “Court” etc. TREATMENT - Contains the type of treatment the road received or will receive. TREATMENT COST - Is an optional field giving the cost in dollars and cents of the treatment. UNIT OF MEASURE - Displays the units of measure used to measure an item. UNIT PRICE - Displays the price paid for an inventory item. VISUAL PCI - Used to identify PCI calculations that have been determined based upon a visual inspection. If this check box is blank, then the PCI was
8
extrapolated based upon the maintenance treatment that has been applied to a management section. WEIGHTING FACTORS - Section displays the weighting factors established by your jurisdiction for the functional classes. YEAR OF MAINTENANCE - Stores the proposed year of a treatment. YEARS BETWEEN CRACK SEALS - Displays the number of years between the application of crack seals for the functional class with a specific severity. YEARS BETWEEN SURFACE SEALS - Displays the recommended number of years that should come between surface seal application for the functional class with the indicated severity. YEARS TO CALCULATE - Stores the number of years you want to include in the Budget Needs calculation. The number of years cannot be less than 5 or more than 20.
REPORT DEFINITIONS ZONES - Geographical areas of the city defined by city staff to aid in the development of a maintenance plan for residential roads. CL - Centerline Mile - a measuring of the length of a road regardless of the width of the road. LM - Lane Mile - a measurement of the length of all the lanes for a given FC or area. ACTION / TREATMENT - A proposed type of rehabilitation work that should be used on a given road segment, based on PCI, FC and engineering evaluation. ANNUAL BUDGET - The amount of money that is available each year to be used for pavement maintenance. These funds can come from various sources and can vary from year to year, although it is generally a fixed figure.
9