●
Cephalometric assessment in anterior open bite patients treated with and without mini-implant anchorages
●
ª√– ‘∑∏‘¿“æ„π°“√μâ“π‡™◊ÈÕ·∫§∑’‡√’¬¢Õß‚ª√æÕ≈‘ μàÕ‡™◊ÈÕ‡ÕÁπ‡∑Õ‚√§Õ°§— ø輪≈≈‘ ·≈–‡™◊ÈÕæÕ√åøî‚√‚¡·π ®‘π®‘«“≈‘
●
°“√®”·π°‡æ»§π‰∑¬¥â«¬¥—™π’øíπ‡¢’È¬«
●
Physical properties of dental stones available in Thailand
●
ø≈ŸÕÕ‰√¥å‡®≈·≈–ø≈ŸÕÕ‰√¥å«“√åπ‘™
●
√Õ¬§√“∫ ’¥”∫πøíπ∫√‘‡«≥‡Àπ◊Õ¢Õ∫‡Àß◊Õ°„π‡¥Á°
A1
A2
æ‘¡æå∑’Ë : ∫√‘…—∑ ª√–™“™π ®”°—¥ 35 ´Õ¬æ‘æ—≤πå ’≈¡ ∫“ß√—° °√ÿ߇∑æœ 10500 ‚∑√. 0-2636-6550-8 ‚∑√ “√ 0-2238-1074 e-mail:
[email protected]
A3
«‘∑¬“ “√∑—πμ·æ∑¬»“ μ√å¡À‘¥≈ ©∫—∫π’ȇªìπ©∫—∫ ÿ¥∑⓬¢Õߪï æ.». 2554 ∑’ˉ¥â√«∫√«¡§«“¡√Ÿâ „À¡à Ê π«—μ°√√¡„À¡à Ê ®“°∑—πμ·æ∑¬åÀ≈“°À≈“¬ “¢“ ´÷Ëß≈â«π·μà¡’ª√–‚¬™πå ”À√—∫∫ÿ§≈“°√∑“ß∑—πμ·æ∑¬å ∑ÿ°∑à“π ‡√◊ËÕß∑’Ë 1: ‡ªìπß“π«‘®—¬¢Õßß“π®—¥øíπ∑’ˬ—ß¡’°“√æ—≤π“Õ¬à“ßμàÕ‡π◊ËÕß π”‡ πÕ‡√◊ËÕß Cephalometric assessment in anterior open bite patients treated with and without mini-implant anchorages ‚¥¬ ºŸâ™à«¬»“ μ√“®“√¬å∑—πμ·æ∑¬åÀ≠‘ß ÿ«√√≥’ ≈—¿π–æ√≈“¿ √à«¡°—∫Õ“®“√¬å¿“§«‘™“∑—πμ°√√¡®—¥øíπ ‡√◊Ë Õ ß∑’Ë 2: ª√– ‘ ∑ ∏‘ ¿ “æ„π°“√μâ “ π‡™◊È Õ ·∫§∑’ ‡ √’ ¬ ¢Õß‚ª√æÕ≈‘ μà Õ ‡™◊È Õ ‡ÕÁ π ‡∑Õ‚√§Õ°§— øï §— ≈ ≈‘ ·≈–‡™◊ÈÕæÕ√åøî‚√‚¡·π ®‘π®‘«“≈‘ ‚¥¬∑—πμ·æ∑¬åÀ≠‘ß®‘πμπ“ “√–∫√√®ß ®“°‚√ß欓∫“≈‡®√‘≠°√ÿß ª√–™“√—°…å ·≈–§ÿ≥∏𑬓 À¡«¥‡™’¬ß§– ®“°¿“§«‘™“®ÿ≈™’««‘∑¬“ §≥–∑—πμ·æ∑¬»“ μ√å ¡À“«‘∑¬“≈—¬ ¡À‘¥≈ ‡√◊ËÕß∑’Ë 3: °“√®”·π°‡æ»§π‰∑¬¥â«¬¥—™π’øíπ‡¢’È¬« ‚¥¬Õ“®“√¬å∑«’æß»å Õ“√¬–æ‘»‘…∞ ·≈–§≥– ®“°¿“§«‘™“°“¬«‘¿“§»“ μ√å ‡√◊ËÕß∑’Ë 4: Physical properties of dental stones available in Thailand ‚¥¬√Õß»“ μ√“®“√¬å ∑— π μ·æ∑¬å À ≠‘ ß æ®¡“π »√’ π «√— μ πå ®“°¿“§«‘ ™ “∑— π μ°√√¡ª√–¥‘ … ∞å ·≈–§≥– ‡√◊ËÕß∑’Ë 5: ø≈ŸÕÕ‰√¥å‡®≈·≈–ø≈ŸÕÕ‰√¥å«“√åπ‘™ ‚¥¬Õ“®“√¬å∑—πμ·æ∑¬åÀ≠‘ß∑‘æπ“∂ «‘™≠“≥√—μπå ®“°¿“§ «‘™“∑—πμ°√√¡™ÿ¡™π ‡√◊ËÕß∑’Ë 6: √Õ¬§√“∫ ’¥”∫πøíπ∫√‘‡«≥‡Àπ◊Õ¢Õ∫‡Àß◊Õ°„π‡¥Á° ‚¥¬Õ“®“√¬å∑—πμ·æ∑¬å À≠‘߇¢Á¡∑Õß ¡‘μ√°Ÿ≈ ®“°¿“§«‘™“∑—πμ°√√¡‡¥Á° ª≈“¬ªï 2554 ¥Ÿ‡ªìπªï∑’Ë¡’Õÿª √√§Àπ—°Àπ“ “À— ”À√—∫‡√“™“«‰∑¬ ∑’Ë„π™à«ß‰μ√¡“ À≈—ߢÕߪï μâÕߺ®≠°—∫ªí≠À“Õÿ∑°¿—¬§√—Èß„À≠à·≈–¬“«π“π°«à“∑ÿ° Ê ªï∑’˺à“π¡“ ∑”„Àâ¡’º≈°√–∑∫‰ª¬—ß°“√∑”ß“π„π À≈“¬ Ê à«πÕ¬à“ß∑—Ë«∂÷ß °Õß∫√√≥“∏‘°“√®÷ߢÕ√à«¡‡ªìπ°”≈—ß„®„À⺟âÕà“π∑ÿ°∑à“π∑’ËøíπΩÉ“Õÿª √√§μà“ß Ê ¡“¥â«¬°—π‡ªìπÕ¬à“ߥ’ ∑“ß«‘∑¬“ “√∑—πμ·æ∑¬»“ μ√å¡À‘¥≈°Á‰¡à‡§¬À¬ÿ¥∑’Ë®–ª√—∫μ—«·≈–æ—≤π“‡æ◊ËÕ„Àâ «‘∑¬“ “√π’È𔇠πÕº≈ß“π∑“ß«‘™“°“√∑’Ë¡’§ÿ≥¿“æ·≈–πà“ π„®μàÕ‰ª ·≈–À“°∑à“π„¥ π„® “¡“√∂ àß ∫∑§«“¡¢Õß∑à“π¡“‰¥â∑’Ë Õ“§“√ 4 ™—Èπ 9 Àπ૬«“√ “√«‘™“°“√ §≥–∑—πμ·æ∑¬»“ μ√å ¡À“«‘∑¬“≈—¬¡À‘¥≈ μ‘¥μàÕ §ÿ≥‡®π≥’»“ ∏√√¡«– “ (‡®â“Àπâ“∑’Ë«“√ “√«‘™“°“√) ‚∑√. 02-660-7769 ‡æ◊ËÕ°“√‡º¬·æ√àμàÕ‰ª ∫√√≥“∏‘°“√
A4
«∑‘ ¬“ “√
∑—πμ·æ∑¬»“ μ√å¡À‘¥≈ MAHIDOL DENTAL JOURNAL
« ∑—πμ ¡À‘¥≈ ªï∑’Ë 31 ‡≈à¡∑’Ë 3, 2554
Original article
Cephalometric assessment in anterior open bite patients treated with and without mini-implant anchorages Penprapa Chiewcharat Postgraduate Student of Orthodontic Residency Training Programme Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University Suwannee Luppanapornlarp B.Sc., D.D.S., M.Sc. (Orthodontics), A.B.O., Tha.B.O., Ph.D. (Dental Sciences) Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University Supatchai Boonpratham D.D.S., Ph.D. (Dental Sciences) Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University Pongstorn Putongkam D.D.S., M.Sc., Dip. Thai Board (Orthodontics) Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University
Abstract Objective: The aims of this study were to determine pre- and posttreat ment of cephalometric measurements in the skeletal anterior open bite patients with and without mini-implant anchorages (MIAs), and to compare the measurements between both groups. The hypothesis is that there are differences of treatment changes between groups. Materials and methods: A retrospective study was performed in fifteen skeletal anterior open bite patients. The MIAs were used to intrude molars in six patients (mean age of 25±8.1 years). Another nine patients (mean age of 24.3±2.6 years) were treated without MIAs and served as a control group. Paired t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to determine changes within and between groups, respectively (P
